I did some handloading years ago with good success, so I know the basics.
Why do handloads fail? Some trustworthy gun experts (Chuck Hawks is one, for instance) seem to suggest never trusting handloads for critical life or death security. These aren't people who are ignorant about handloading or anti- handloading. They may even hand load themselves. But it seems like nobody really trusts hand loads 100%.
Then, recently, I read the results of a pistol torture test comparing several different models of guns and ammo that all fired 1000 rounds in a structured situation. The results were pretty interesting (I can find the link, probably, if anyone's interested) and it showed general trends in reliability, including feeding, firing, jamming, etc. The most dramatic difference was with the contestants who were shooting hand loads. The difference was DRAMATIC. All of the handload shooters had such poor reliability they were basically in a category all their own.
I could understand that there might be a couple of sloppy reloaders in that mix, but would also assume there would be some really meticulous ones, too. So assuming this, it seems that even a meticulous hand loader shouldn't trust the reliability of his loads.
Why is this? What is the Achilles heel of hand loads? Contaminated primers? Feed problems due to poor case sizing? Bullets not seated tightly?
Opinions, arguments, and experiences welcome!
David
Why do handloads fail? Some trustworthy gun experts (Chuck Hawks is one, for instance) seem to suggest never trusting handloads for critical life or death security. These aren't people who are ignorant about handloading or anti- handloading. They may even hand load themselves. But it seems like nobody really trusts hand loads 100%.
Then, recently, I read the results of a pistol torture test comparing several different models of guns and ammo that all fired 1000 rounds in a structured situation. The results were pretty interesting (I can find the link, probably, if anyone's interested) and it showed general trends in reliability, including feeding, firing, jamming, etc. The most dramatic difference was with the contestants who were shooting hand loads. The difference was DRAMATIC. All of the handload shooters had such poor reliability they were basically in a category all their own.
I could understand that there might be a couple of sloppy reloaders in that mix, but would also assume there would be some really meticulous ones, too. So assuming this, it seems that even a meticulous hand loader shouldn't trust the reliability of his loads.
Why is this? What is the Achilles heel of hand loads? Contaminated primers? Feed problems due to poor case sizing? Bullets not seated tightly?
Opinions, arguments, and experiences welcome!
David
Last edited: