Pokajabba
member
Been reading through some posts in the revolver section and have seen others say what I've been saying about Ruger's LCRx revolver, which is "Why are they just making them in .38 and nothing else?"
Personally, I would pay my left leg for an LCRx in .22 LR and I'm sure I'm not alone in that opinion. I'm sure that some would love to have it in .357 Mag and with the adj. sights and longer barrel, that would be a much more effective choice than the regular LCR in .357.
And it's not like Ruger doesn't have an abundance of cylinders, hammers, and other parts on the shelves for the LCR that they can drop right into a new LCRx in .22 or .357.
So other forum people, what do you think about this? What gives?
Personally, I would pay my left leg for an LCRx in .22 LR and I'm sure I'm not alone in that opinion. I'm sure that some would love to have it in .357 Mag and with the adj. sights and longer barrel, that would be a much more effective choice than the regular LCR in .357.
And it's not like Ruger doesn't have an abundance of cylinders, hammers, and other parts on the shelves for the LCR that they can drop right into a new LCRx in .22 or .357.
So other forum people, what do you think about this? What gives?