Sorry...but I have a hard time seeing the attraction to a heavy,limited capacity pistol well known for being unreliable 'out of the box'. The 1911 is well known for slam fires and Ad's when lowering the small hammer on a loaded chamber. I can find steel guns, reliability and very good triggers without problems like that. Yes, my perceptions might be wrong so feel free to try to persuade me otherwise...
Sorry...but I have a hard time seeing the attraction to a heavy
Heavy = low recoil. AL framed models are fairly light, but still heavier than plastic. No contest there.
limited capacity pistol well
7+1 in plenty, and the 1911 reloads quickly and it's thin mags are easy to CCW. A single stack Glock or M&P would be a huge seller.
known for being unreliable 'out of the box'.
Actually my Dan Wesson 1911's are more reliable than my Glocks, Kahrs, and Rugers. You just have to buy the expensive 1911's to get the good ones. (give or take Colt)
The 1911 is well known for slam fires and Ad's when lowering the small hammer on a loaded chamber.
No need to ever lower the hammer on a 1911. The only time my hammer is down is for field stripping. Empty, full, +1, or +0, the hammer's cocked. Why would anyone ever need to lower the hammer on a 1911 with one in the pipe?
I can find steel guns, reliability and very good triggers without problems like that. Fair enough.
Yes, my perceptions might be wrong so feel free to try to persuade me otherwise...
Sorry...but I have a hard time seeing the attraction to a heavy,limited capacity pistol well known for being unreliable 'out of the box'. The 1911 is well known for slam fires and Ad's when lowering the small hammer on a loaded chamber. I can find steel guns, reliability and very good triggers without problems like that. Yes, my perceptions might be wrong so feel free to try to persuade me otherwise...
jahwarrior said:Why Own A 1911?
R.W.Dale said:Cause what other automatic only holds 7 rounds and weights almost as much as a small toolbox?
Sorry...but I have a hard time seeing the attraction to a heavy
Heavy = low recoil. AL framed models are fairly light, but still heavier than plastic. No contest there.
known for being unreliable 'out of the box'.
Actually my Dan Wesson 1911's are more reliable than my Glocks, Kahrs, and Rugers. You just have to buy the expensive 1911's to get the good ones. (give or take Colt)
The 1911 is well known for slam fires and Ad's when lowering the small hammer on a loaded chamber.
No need to ever lower the hammer on a 1911. The only time my hammer is down is for field stripping. Empty, full, +1, or +0, the hammer's cocked. Why would anyone ever need to lower the hammer on a 1911 with one in the pipe?
Oh, i dunno. It depends on what your definition of reliable entails. If you mean reliable for the casual shooter, i think most of the cheaper 1911s can hang. If you mean reliable over the course of a gunsite class, probably not.
I think to an extent those extremes are mutually exclusive. Fact is, if your an occastiobal shooter, you do not need the level of reliability of a les baer gun gives you. You RIA pistol will perform well and be trustworthy, because it won't wear out. If you shoot a few thousand rounds a year, your benchmark is much higher. Its like saying you have to buy a viper to run to the bank or something
I shoot about 1k + a year of .45, so I bought a more expensive gun (sig scorpion) because i need and want a higher level of performance, and I expect this gun to provide that. If i was just running a box of ammo downrange every now and again, i would have bought an RIA.
Also, my ten 1911s would have to argue with your unreliability claim. My Combat Elite is going on 20,000 jam-free rounds.