Why the .44 Special

Status
Not open for further replies.
Before I bought this Bulldog in the top picture add on GB, which CA later rebarrelled to make it shoot to the sights better and polished and reblued as in the lower photo, I was at a lgs and saw my first Rossi 720 3", 5 shot adj sight, .44 special revolver. I too had longed for a model 19 conversion years ago and couldn't believe my eyes. This was so similar even though it had coil springs and couldn't be quite as smooth, though pretty good as is. I agonized for over a month and finally reluctantly passed on it. At 73, my days out in the woods and fields are about over. My wife's needs keep me pretty close to home and my carry guns usually need to be light if I'm going to carry all day, every day. The Rossi, nice as it was is just a bit too heavy for that. Oh for short periods of carry and at the range it would have been a joy to own and I still regret not having bought it also - especially when at the range I realize my shooting would be more accurate with it than the Bulldog I bought and carry often when I'm not carrying an even lighter 1980's stainless CA Undercover in a simply rugged pancake or in a pocket which they do so well at.

Back when I had the chance to buy N frame .44 specials when they were often found at lgs' I never was comfortable with the N frame. It was just a bit too large and so I never did get to enjoy them even though our local police chief let me use his nickle .44 mag to hunt with when Illinois first opened the handgun season years ago.

So for now, I enjoy the Bulldog and would love to have one cut down to 2" with a front sight and probably pass on the ports. True, it would be nice if they were a bit stronger, but then they would have to be heavier to compensate. They do what we want them to do for up close and personal very well. The Underwood full wadcutters are what are in the gun and the Silvertips are for reloads. Both have a little more recoil than say 4.5 to 5.0 grains of Bullseye and a 215 gr swc but not enough to really matter. They shoot maybe less than an inch low and the 215 is maybe 1/2" high. I have the original hand filling Bulldog grips on the bulldog right now and love the newer wood Classic Bulldog grips on the Undercover. I don't think I've ever even shot it with the little "splinter" grips it came with. Maybe, if I ever lay hands on an adapter.


pix722414493.jpg IMG_20191124_141919192.jpg
 
@Biblethumpncop drat you and your entire box of ammunition! :) I REALLY like that rounding you have in those pictures you shared. I'll have you know, I can't come back to this thread and not look again, and wonder when I'll get the time to flatter your work with my woeful imitation thereof.
 
CCD152EF-A1AF-4E24-BC62-A920A72A2137.jpeg
@Biblethumpncop drat you and your entire box of ammunition! :) I REALLY like that rounding you have in those pictures you shared. I'll have you know, I can't come back to this thread and not look again, and wonder when I'll get the time to flatter your work with my woeful imitation thereof.

Well shucks...

This photo shows you how much material was removed from the grips and grip frame, compared to a unmodified XR3-RED grip frame.
 
Getting into this thread a bit late, but.....

When I was a young man, I sought out, and obtained high power handguns. Everything "magnum", I drooled for a Wildey or an Automag. Never did get one of those. But, I wanted power. It was a lust. I even built a 10mm 1911 a few months before Colt had the Delta Elite (thanks Irv... rip).s
And then, as I matured, I realized more and more, raw power no longer matters to me. I am content with 38special (though I fire 'em in 38 or 357 revolvers). I'm content with 45LC and 45ACP and .... the 44Special.

I've become a student of the big, heavy, thumper bullet philosophy. I'm good with that 255 or 246 grain bullet or even 200g bullet in a 38 special. I just.... I dunno.... I just shoot 'em better, and they're more accurate for me. I know they'll get the job done in any sort of situation I need 'em to. Just me.

So, here's to my 1911's in 45ACP, my single actions in 45LC and my lone Boomer in 44 Special.... hopefully it will have a stable-mate soon.
Let us know if you work up (or buy in a box) anything good for that Boomer. That is one gun that calls for some careful ammo choices.
 
I was bitten hard by the .44 Spl bug, had 6 at one time. I'm down to 3 now but I still have the love for them, even more than the Magnum. To me the Magnum is loud and obnoxious. The Spl in a large frame can be loaded to some pretty respectable velocity. This 24-3 is my favorite.

View attachment 964610
Y'know, if I saw you walk up with THAT gun (properly holstered), I would simply put down my hot dog and my potato salad, I'd pull up a chair, and I would wait quietly to hear about what other gems you have in store.
 
Brethren and Sistren,

If you can bear to read the work of a man who wrote the execrable words, "44 aint nuthin special but smith and wesson's always alright,"
your eyeballs and intellects may find this rewarding:

https://americanhandgunner.com/our-experts/early-sw-44-specials/

In the first paragraph of the article The Duck writes
“44 Special.
It’s a fine old low-velocity, big-bore handgun round no better and no worse than several others”,
Thats sums up praise to me ...

The Duck , I says ....
 
Last edited:
In the first paragraph of the article The Duck writes
“44 Special.
It’s a fine old low-velocity, big-bore handgun round no better and no worse than several others”,
Thats sums up praise to me ...

The Duck , I says ....
"The Duck, I says," the Buckeye says.
 
Top one is a standard Undercover in .38 Spl. from around 1972-73. It's a good shooter.
Bottom is a Bulldog in 44 Spl. From I think the early 80s and is unfired as NIB.
 
I've always respected Venturino but you have to understand his perspective. He's more of an academic than an outdoorsman. He doesn't hunt with handguns and has probably never shot anything resembling a "Keith load" in his life. The things that make the .44 Special "special", are outside his interests.
 
Top one is a standard Undercover in .38 Spl. from around 1972-73. It's a good shooter.
Bottom is a Bulldog in 44 Spl. From I think the early 80s and is unfired as NIB.

Your Bulldog is the model I have been looking for ,,, for years .. Im Green with envy
 
Let us know if you work up (or buy in a box) anything good for that Boomer. That is one gun that calls for some careful ammo choices.

I had a few issues with light loads and primers backing out, but there was also roughness to the recoil shield. Right now its doing fine with empty cases, firing primers only, they back out some but don't lock it up. I've upped my load from what they had in the Lee manual to what was in two Speer manuals. In another thread, I've mentioned how "never exceed" load in the Lee book was the "starting load" in the Speer. Makes one say hmmmm.....

Truth be told, I carry that gun lots. Its really my go to. I carry Fiocci .44 Russian ammo in it. Don't laugh... its loaded to 44 Special spec, or so they say. At any rate, it was cheap when I got it (under $20 a box of 50!) so I bought a few boxes, and its my only factory ammo. I only carry factory ammo. And it has dispatched on pit bull. Not Charter, but my lowest life, renting the place neighbors.

Only thing I know for sure with the lil'ol Boomer is "aim for their male parts, and you'll hit 'em in the chest". Range sessions have proven this == for me, my eyes, my hold == on that sightless gun.
 
View attachment 965436This photo shows you how much material was removed from the grips and grip frame, compared to a unmodified XR3-RED grip frame.

Thanks for that. I've got an XR3 (not RED), but it still has a little bit of flare at the back. I think I'll straighten that flare, round off the corner in the back well, and round the front as you have done, as well as melt in the flats on the bottom. Just got to find the time to do so... things are unseasonably crazy busy. If still had my old belt grinder it would be quick work, but that's long gone.
 
Y'know, if I saw you walk up with THAT gun (properly holstered), I would simply put down my hot dog and my potato salad, I'd pull up a chair, and I would wait quietly to hear about what other gems you have in store.
Thank you.
 
My Bull dogs and most used carried .44 spl. by far over 30 years + . I do carry a .44 Mag for hunts or bear country exploits tho
IMG_20170401_112226714_zps89425a26.jpg .44 mags to the right but started with .44 mags in late 70s with SuperBlackhawk then S&W 8 3/8th " in shoulder holsters hog hunting heavily 75-95 005_zpse90b8c2a.jpg
 
Your rig = Good. Lord. Almighty.
Those are both 629s; the 4" is a Mountain revolver of 1989 and is my favorite .44 overall. The other is a 629 no dash and is very well finished with recessed cylinders ect.. The knife strap works as a Sam Browne type strap to hold up the belt. It is a Mad Dog Dundee rig . This is kinda like it , you draw down the blade with strong hand with the blade pointed up at 45 degrees towards the back under the shoulder (so you can pin the sheath to body by lowering arm ) and blade facing down . I can't find an image of a Mad Dog Dundee being worn anywhere. The short belt loop is on my left front of belt and the long strap over shoulder and runs diagonally to behind the right holster area. If I am hunting I wear the 6". For defense the 4" lighter Mtn. revolver
ae480aa8175802de1e74ce1ff50d595c.jpg
 
Last edited:
Owned three of them; including an S&W 696 that was okay, a 296 that was not all that pleasant to shoot and a 3" Taurus 431 (I think) that was pretty neat.
I lent it to a friend and his wife/daughter/daughter's boyfriend....well, suffice it to say i never saw it again. Only decent Taurus I ever laid hands on, go figure.

Anyway, I moved on to .45LC. Same size revolver, similar size bullet, I have dies and now own two M-25s, and old(ish) one and a new(er) one and don't really miss the .44Spl at all any more.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top