Will Rohrbaugh Be The Next Smith & Wesson?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gusgus

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
82
Location
Southern New Jersey
There’s been a lot of talk and hype, of a new gun manufacturer coming on the scene, that is destined to revolutionize CCW. Their new R-9, a P-32 sized 9mm, may do just that.

But, Rohrbaugh has another offering. One that may change personal firearms as we know them. One that should be causing great concern among the entire RKBA community. The R-9's twin sister, the little MS-9. The MS-9, is an R-9 fitted with a magnetic sear, that requires the shooter to wear a special ring, in order to fire it. The first true production “smart gunâ€. Why should this be a concern? Humor me if you would for a moment.

Recently, a new gun law was added to New Jersey’s books. A “smart gun†law. Currently, the law sits idle, waiting for the one catalyst, that will destroy gun ownership in the state. A production smart gun! We had hoped that it would take many years, for one of these products to make it to market. Years we could spend in an attempt to overturn the law, but time has run out.

Next month (February ‘03), Rohrbaugh will introduce their new R-9 & MS-9, and smart guns will become a reality for the gun owners of New Jersey. Three years, from the introduction of the MS-9, all handguns sold in this state, whether new or used, will require electronic or mechanic personalization, or in other words, smart gun technology.

Well, I can here it now. “Simple, just get out of Jersey.†I agree, and am planning my escape, but the story doesn’t end there. Do you think that other gun manufacturers will allow Rohrbaugh to corner the Jersey hand gun market? Of course not. All those smart gun designs, sitting on the back burners, will be rushed into production. Once the product is readily available, how long do you think it will take, before Massachusetts, California, Maryland, etc. pass similar legislation of their own? Slowly, these restrictions will spread like a cancer, until it grips every corner of our great nation.

Even if the stronger RKBA states are able to hold off this disease, how long do you think manufactures will continue to make traditional firearms, once smart guns become viable? Can you imagine what a trial lawyer could do in court to a manufacturer that makes both traditional and smart guns? “Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, ABC gun company had the technology to make their firearms safe, as shown in this example of their Model 219, but chose to continue to manufacture deadly, dangerous weapons, like this Model 77 that took the innocent life of 4 year old Johnny.†Once smart gun technology is common place, the liability risks associated with manufacturing traditional firearms, will be far too great. Handguns as we know them today, will cease to exist.

We all knew that it was coming, but most of us thought it would be in the far, distant future. Next month, thanks to Rohrbaugh, and the State of New Jersey, the gears will be set in motion. May fate be kind to us all.
 
And "the sky is falling..." :D

Actually, magnetic trigger locks have been around for a long time. Rohrbaugh is just the first one to fit one to a semiautomatic.

You can buy kits to fit them to revolvers.

The MS-9 isn't going to be a "smart gun" AFAIK. It's just going to require a magnetic coupling to release the trigger, which is just a slight variation on the Taurus internal key lock, etc.

I think "smart guns" are supposed to be personalized in a way that's not easily defeatable like magnetic trigger locks are.

I think the increased cost of the MS-9 over the R-9 will be about $100, so if a customer wants it, there it is.

The flip side of the coin is that some states already require internal locks for guns sold in them. Would you rather have Rohrbaugh not sell in those states? The business guru would say "put the Magnetic Safety on, let's sell them in the weenie states, and make more bucks. Furthermore, let's license our technology to other makers who want to put it on their guns."

If it's a consumer's choice in states that don't require the locks, then that's just it -- a consumer's choice. If I lived in a weenie state where I couldn't get the gun without the MS system, I'd be happy it was available. Until the weenie politicians are voted out and the laws changed, that's just the way it is.

As for magnetic locks, any 8 yo kid who can't defeat them should be examined for retardation. They're just designed to keep an assailant from easily and instantly being able to use your gun against you. But what happens when all the potential BGs start wearing magnetic rings...?
 
Maybe if it worked with a mood ring so that it wouldn't shoot those "angry" bullets the anti's hate (fear) so much.:) go. :fire: No Go. :scrutiny: Please try again.
 
Just make sure that the police and LEO's in New Jersey are required to use the new guns.

That way they will be safe too!

Watch what happens when LEO's are required to live and die with this technology!

This was attempted once before, by the FEDs and the answer was ok when the LEO's approve carry so will the folks.

it died a stillbirth.

Fred
 
Put me down for a non-magnetic Rohrbaugh.
I'm already down for one.

It'll be worth it even if it has teething problems!

(Besides, Rohrbaugh has the same warranty policy as Kel-Tec, so my risk is that they stay in business, which is the same risk they have. :D )
 
Magic rings did not work in 75; they won't work in 05.
While I have no desire for such a gun, the system of magnetic rings does work and has for some time. Rick Devoid at Tarnhelm Supply Co. has been putting the Magnatrigger into revolvers for some time. You may have no use for it (and neither do I), but it does work.
 
I'm already down for one.

Ditto. Note that if you were one of the VERY earliest people to ask to be put on the 'early adopters' list, you may want to call Eric to confirm that you are still on the list - he told me that he lost the file (computer HD crash?) for the first 250 names or so...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top