litman252
Member
They are having a public hearing tomorrow (9-9-03) Please attend, call or write your reps!!!!!!!!!
Find Your Rep.
Thanks,
Tony
Find Your Rep.
Thanks,
Tony
I hope the packed rooms means that the pro-gunners outweighed the anti's by 3-1 or more... that's the way it usually ended up in MN anyway, IIRC.Committees hear testimony on concealed weapons bill
Associated Press
Last Updated: Sept. 9, 2003
Madison - Two state lawmakers urged their colleagues Tuesday to join them to end Wisconsin's 130-year-old ban on carrying concealed weapons, saying law-abiding citizens deserve the right to protect themselves.
Related Links
The Bills
Senate Bill 214
Assembly Bill 444
Sen. Dave Zien and Rep. Scott Gunderson spoke Tuesday during a public hearing on their bill to allow eligible Wisconsin residents who pass a training course to carry concealed weapons.
The legislative committees holding the hearing were not expected to vote on the legislation Tuesday.
Gunderson (R-Union Grove) became emotional as he told the committees how he was assaulted with a crowbar one morning while opening his store. He said he couldn't guarantee a law allowing him to carry a concealed weapon would have prevented the attack, but it could have made his attacker think twice.
"There is no doubt that criminals prefer to prey on the unarmed," Gunderson said.
People packed the hearing room and three overflow rooms set up so they could hear the testimony. Wisconsin is one of just six states that has an outright ban on carrying concealed weapons, according to the Wisconsin Pro-Gun Movement.
Democrats on the committees raised several questions about the bill. Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Madison) asked Gunderson and Zien why they hadn't included exemptions to allow businesses and churches to ban people from carrying concealed weapons on their premises.
Sen. Tim Carpenter (D-Milwaukee) also urged them to amend the bill to allow local governments to ban concealed weapons if voters approve such a move through a referendum. He said Milwaukee County's urban environment is much different from the counties where Gunderson and Zien live.
"I'm concerned we'll have permits for Polk and murders for Milwaukee," Carpenter said. "I don't want this forced down the throats of Milwaukee."
Gunderson said adding a string of exemptions to the bill would make it meaningless. Zien said state law already forbids local governments from restricting access to firearms beyond state regulations.
The bill proposed by Gunderson and Zien is similar to legislation that passed the Assembly 58-40 last year but failed to win state Senate approval.
It would allow residents to apply with a county sheriff for a five-year permit to carry a concealed weapon. Applicants would have to meet a series of requirements to receive the permit, including being at least 21 years old and being eligible to carry a firearm under federal law.
Under the bill, a sheriff would have to do a background check on applicants.
Those found incompetent, drug or alcohol dependent, or mentally ill would not receive a permit.
Applicants would pay a fee for the license. Part of the money would reimburse sheriff departments for the background checks.
Wisconsin's concealed weapons law, in place since the 1870s, prohibits anyone but a peace officer from carrying a concealed and dangerous weapon.
In 1998, state voters approved a right-to-bear-arms amendment to the state constitution that says: "The people have the right to keep and bear arms for security, defense, hunting, recreation or any other lawful purpose."
Gov. Jim Doyle, a Democrat, declined Tuesday to say whether he would veto the bill should it reach his desk, though he restated his opposition to the measure. The bill would need approval from both houses of the Legislature and Doyle to become law.
More complete coverage of this story will appear online later today and in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Wednesday morning.