Wisconsin CCW update

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hey litman, we're pulling for you!

I was in Janesville once. On the way to Int'l Falls and broke a tooth on the way up. Met up with a great dentist.
Neat town.:p
 
The hearings tomorrow are pretty much a show of force for the media. Yes, they're important for that reason, but what's more important is that every cheesehead gunowner visits, calls or writes his legislators.

We really can get this passed. I'm laying odds at 50-50, because I just can't know how many gunowners are going to sit on their mushy behinds and not care, and not write or call.

If they care, we'll win. If they don't, we'll lose.

It's that simple.
 
Update from the Milwaukee JS

Here's the story
Committees hear testimony on concealed weapons bill
Associated Press
Last Updated: Sept. 9, 2003
Madison - Two state lawmakers urged their colleagues Tuesday to join them to end Wisconsin's 130-year-old ban on carrying concealed weapons, saying law-abiding citizens deserve the right to protect themselves.

Related Links

The Bills

Senate Bill 214
Assembly Bill 444



Sen. Dave Zien and Rep. Scott Gunderson spoke Tuesday during a public hearing on their bill to allow eligible Wisconsin residents who pass a training course to carry concealed weapons.

The legislative committees holding the hearing were not expected to vote on the legislation Tuesday.

Gunderson (R-Union Grove) became emotional as he told the committees how he was assaulted with a crowbar one morning while opening his store. He said he couldn't guarantee a law allowing him to carry a concealed weapon would have prevented the attack, but it could have made his attacker think twice.

"There is no doubt that criminals prefer to prey on the unarmed," Gunderson said.

People packed the hearing room and three overflow rooms set up so they could hear the testimony. Wisconsin is one of just six states that has an outright ban on carrying concealed weapons, according to the Wisconsin Pro-Gun Movement.

Democrats on the committees raised several questions about the bill. Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Madison) asked Gunderson and Zien why they hadn't included exemptions to allow businesses and churches to ban people from carrying concealed weapons on their premises.

Sen. Tim Carpenter (D-Milwaukee) also urged them to amend the bill to allow local governments to ban concealed weapons if voters approve such a move through a referendum. He said Milwaukee County's urban environment is much different from the counties where Gunderson and Zien live.

"I'm concerned we'll have permits for Polk and murders for Milwaukee," Carpenter said. "I don't want this forced down the throats of Milwaukee."

Gunderson said adding a string of exemptions to the bill would make it meaningless. Zien said state law already forbids local governments from restricting access to firearms beyond state regulations.

The bill proposed by Gunderson and Zien is similar to legislation that passed the Assembly 58-40 last year but failed to win state Senate approval.

It would allow residents to apply with a county sheriff for a five-year permit to carry a concealed weapon. Applicants would have to meet a series of requirements to receive the permit, including being at least 21 years old and being eligible to carry a firearm under federal law.

Under the bill, a sheriff would have to do a background check on applicants.

Those found incompetent, drug or alcohol dependent, or mentally ill would not receive a permit.

Applicants would pay a fee for the license. Part of the money would reimburse sheriff departments for the background checks.

Wisconsin's concealed weapons law, in place since the 1870s, prohibits anyone but a peace officer from carrying a concealed and dangerous weapon.

In 1998, state voters approved a right-to-bear-arms amendment to the state constitution that says: "The people have the right to keep and bear arms for security, defense, hunting, recreation or any other lawful purpose."

Gov. Jim Doyle, a Democrat, declined Tuesday to say whether he would veto the bill should it reach his desk, though he restated his opposition to the measure. The bill would need approval from both houses of the Legislature and Doyle to become law.

More complete coverage of this story will appear online later today and in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Wednesday morning.
I hope the packed rooms means that the pro-gunners outweighed the anti's by 3-1 or more... that's the way it usually ended up in MN anyway, IIRC.
 
Thanks for the Support, I called a normally quite buddy, he is a CCW suporter, he had his family and friends all calling. Quite a feeling seeing people unite for a good cause.

I copied my response to another thread:

"I listend to talk shows in Madison as much as possible today, You guys should have heard it,

" I was in Texas when the legalized CCW, 8-9 people a day were shot by these hot headed cowboys"

" You are 3-4 times more likely to be shot in your home it you own a gun, you want those odds on the street??"

Don't renember exactly but someting like....."(a BS statistic) number of cops are killed by there own guns each year, now citizens want this ability also?"

Man I was steaming, Thankfully both of the hosts, 1 Republican, 1 Democratic where for CCW. the majority of calls were positive.

Tony"
 
The hearings today were a sight to behold. We outnumbered the anti's by 4:1 in the morning; by afternoon they'd all left for their kumbaya sessions, so we outnumbered them by probably 20:1 or more.

The district attorney from Milwaukee made a rare appearance, which means that they anti's know this bill is going to pass both chambers. DA McCann showed maps where there had been shots fired last year, and talked about how many rounds are fired in the bad neighborhoods each month. He didn't seem to comprehend the idea that these are gang-bangers and drug-dealers doing the shootings. McCann is a smart attorney and DA, but he really came across as not knowing what he was talking about.

State Senator Tim Carpenter kept harping on little details that mean nothing. I'm beginning to question how this guy ever got his high school diploma or even a GED. He cited VPC stats like gospel.

The anti's brought in a woman whose son was killed by another young man by negligent discharge. "The-gun's-not-loaded" syndrome. She talked about the "gun going off and shooting her son." I suppose she and her late son's killer are still friends, but she's not on the best of terms with the gun.

Our side had an "victim" as well: a young woman who was brutally and repeatedly raped and left for dead. Her sister was also raped. After her testimony and plea for a means to defend herself and her family, the chamber was eerily silent.

Darren LaSorte, our NRA/ILA representative, made one of the most compelling arguments for concealed carry that I've ever heard. The aforementioned Senator Tim Carpenter objected to having LaSorte testify, because Darren's not from Wisconsin. Carpenter got his yap shut in very short order.

The head of the Wisconsin Pro-Gun Movement, Jim Fendry, offered up one of the most direct challenges I've ever heard at a public committee hearing. After a few chair-polishing chiefs and sheriffs voiced their objections to the bill, Fendry suggested that they show their committment to non-violence by disarming themselves and their officers and deputies when they're off-duty. Fendry also was able to use his 20 years of experience as a police officer to rebut many of the bogus claims made by the chair-polishers.

The news media was out in greater force than they've ever been at previous CCW hearings. Again, this is a sign that the bills are going to pass.

So, how many gun owners will take the time to write or call their reps? We can win this. Honest to God, we can win this. But only if we utilize the incredible political clout that gun owners in Wisconsin seem to forget they have.

Remember Sean Connery's line from The Untouchables? He said, "what are you prepared to do about it?"

Well, what are you prepared to do?
 
But Dick, what is there to prevent Doyle from vetoing the bill? After the property tax freeze veto, I can't imagine him ever supporting conservative issues.
 
Oh, ye of little faith. ;)

The world doesn't stop with a Doyle veto. He can be pressured to just let the bill sit for 30 days and automatically become law. It would be in the best interest of his party (not that he's ever given a damn about the other members of the Democrat party), so there's a slim chance that could happen.

The other alternative--and the most likely--is that backers of the CCW bill start courting Democrat lawmakers to vote for an override. There are roughly seven prospects on the senate side, each with their own axe to grind against Doyle. Over on the assembly side, there's representatives who would like a little political payback themselves.

And, then, there's the elected officials who operate on principles. We have a few of them, too.

Like I said, we can do it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top