Feel free to disagree, but if you think that Sierra's published Max loads are running at SAAMI maximum pressures in there rifles, you are delusional. Do you think that for one moment their lawyers would allow a TRUE SAAMI maximum pressure load to be published in the off chance that someone uses it with perhaps a change in brass from a commercial case to a military case with reduced capacity, and has a catastrophic situation?
USSR,
I personally don`t know what the loads in Sierras manual produced in their tests. I don`t even know for sure if Sierra pressure tests or works up their loads by case head expansion, or a computer model, as I`ve heard some companies do. I do know Speer now claims to pressure test thier loads, where as in the past they stated they used case head measurment as a referance to the pressure the loads were giveing. I also still stand by my belief that they list the loads they feel as being at max pressure. Note Speer has lowered quite a few of their older loads.
Remember too the loads, if pressure tested , are worked up in SAAMI std barrels and chambers that are much tighter then a normal factory chamber. Loads will give as a result, lower pressure in a factory gun then in a test barrel. Velocities also are normally lower because of this as most have found when they crono their loads. Sierra bullets COULD be of harder core or thicker jacket material giving more resistance because of increased bearing surface or be influenced by other component differances from the loads in the other manuals you seem to believe are more honest.
There is also the possiblity they noted pressure swings wider then those foundby other companies. The SAAMI spec has not only a MAX AVERAGE but a MAX ALLOWED individual pressure. The loads may well be under avg max but one hit the allowed max during testing. Again I don`t know, I`m just stateing possible reasons for different charge listings.........
I'm not sure that's true, either. I think some companies are more conservative than others. One genuine example: look at Hodgdon's reloading manual and Speer No. 13, for .380acp. The MAX load in Hodgdon's book is LESS than the STARTING load for Speer 13 for some powders
Dave, take another look at the books and compare like bullets and powders. I find only the 90 gr Speer and Tite Group as a matching load in the Speer #13 and Hodgdon #27 manuals. The Speer book shows a starting load of 2.7 gr and max of 3.1gr with this bullet. Hodgdon lists 2.7 - 3.2 gr, vel is Speer 930 fps vs Hodgdon 953 fps both in 3.75" bbls. Pretty close.......
Lets look at other 380 loads. Hodgdon uses Hornady bullets for their other loads (useing HODGDON powders) a 90 gr JHP and a 100 gr FMJ.
The 90 gr in Hodgdons #27 shows 3.2 gr - 3.5 gr of H38. and 2.2gr - 3.2 gr of Tite Group.
Hornadies #5 shows 2.9 - 3.5grs of H38 and 2.7 - 3.2 gr of Tite Group with the same bullet........Hmmmmm
For the 100 gr FMJ Hodgdon shows 2.9 - 3.1 grs of H38 and 2.6 - 3.0 gr of Tite Group.
Hornady #5 lists 2.5 - 3.3 grs of H38 and 2.3 - 3.0 gr of Tite group.
Considering Hodgdon used CCI primers and Hornady WSP the loads are remarkably similar. Remember every component change and test platform differance will change the pressure and there for the max listed load. You can`t compare apples to oranges with load data. The components have to be exact to get similar results, Any change will alter your results. This is a good example of why one should use the data from the bullet manufacture he is useing to work up his loads.
If you use the exact same brand components and work up with a crony to the same velocity you SHOULD be in the ball park of the pressures found by the data compilers. Your pressure may be a bit lower or higher but it "shouldn`t" give you problems. Use Speer data with Nosler bullets doing this and things could change.