Would this theoretical SKS be 922r compliant?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Euclidean

Member
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
831
Location
Texas
Hey all. I'm looking to see if I can put a folding stock on an SKS with minimal parts replacement. I have this neat idea to make an SKS in a certain configuration I want to try, and a folding stock would just be gravy.

I'm trying to play the 10 parts or less game.

So far I count 9 import parts:

1) receiver, 2) barrel, 3) bolt, 4) bolt carrier, 5) gas piston, 6) trigger housing, 7) trigger, 8) hammer, 9) disconnector

I have resigned myself to using a USA made magazine as that's one of the easiest ways to accomplish this. Does it have to be fixed or can it be detachable? 10 rounds is just fine for what I want to do with it, but I may have to settle on 5 rounders.

The original furniture was quite decrepit and I've since discarded it as it was in very poor shape, including the stock and handguard. I'll be replacing it with an American after market set of parts.

I have a bayonet lug but no bayonet nor do I want a bayonet, ditto for grenade launchers, muzzle brakes, etc. etc.

Right now all the rifle basically is are those 9 components I have listed having discarded the magazine and subsequently its follower and floorplate. It's in pieces on the floor waiting for me to put it back together.

Assuming I get all American made parts from here on end, should I be okay to put a folding stock on it? I am just lazy and don't want to go through the gosh awful pain of dinging out that little pin so I can replace the gas piston.

I do have one other option: I am planning on getting an aftermarket sight anyway, so I can remove the rear sight if I need to.

Edit: Wait I just remember replacing the gas piston is super easy... I need to not post crap on the internet when I am tired.
 
If you replace the gas piston, op rod, magazine/floorplate/follower, and buttstock with USA-made components, you should be 922(r) compliant.
 
Smart Poster said:
Theoretically, you could E-Mail the BATFE and ask them.
http://www.atf.treas.gov

Silly me. I didn't even think to try that.

Good advice all. It makes me wonder if I can keep the integral Chinese magazine since it's going to be the most reliable option... well I will find out.
 
For my 922(r) compliant SKS, I use the TAPCO five-round Zytel magazine. As long as I load it to four (4) rounds, it's 100% reliable. Since this SKS is set up for hunting, that's OK by me....
 
Theoretically, you could E-Mail the BATFE and ask them.

I read somewhere that they only answer eligibility questions in writing. Unfortunately, all my C&R documentation is at home and I am not. Does anyone have the address handy?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top