Tomcat47
Member
I would not 
..........IMHO! money coud be well spent another way....doesnt look very user friendly either! I would opt for the 203 launcher also. More practial...more options also considering the one shot theory. There are more versions of the 203 that overshadow the 12 (IMO) The M203 can fire high-explosive, smoke, illuminating, buckshot direct fire, CS gas, and training grenades.
M203...................................
I liiiiikkkkkkeeee it!
Rate of fire 5 to 7 round/min
Muzzle velocity 250 ft/s (76 m/s)
Effective range 160 yd (150 m)
Maximum range 1,312 ft (400 m)
I highly doubt you could pump and handle the contraption at the start of this thread any faster than 5 - 7 rnds / minute. And the 12 comes no where near abiity in range.
..........IMHO! money coud be well spent another way....doesnt look very user friendly either! I would opt for the 203 launcher also. More practial...more options also considering the one shot theory. There are more versions of the 203 that overshadow the 12 (IMO) The M203 can fire high-explosive, smoke, illuminating, buckshot direct fire, CS gas, and training grenades.M203...................................
I liiiiikkkkkkeeee it!Rate of fire 5 to 7 round/min
Muzzle velocity 250 ft/s (76 m/s)
Effective range 160 yd (150 m)
Maximum range 1,312 ft (400 m)
I highly doubt you could pump and handle the contraption at the start of this thread any faster than 5 - 7 rnds / minute. And the 12 comes no where near abiity in range.