I was thinking the same thing! SAA Clones are so much fun! and I love them. But you know Billy the Kid swear by his Schofeild! Just Meat & PotatoesI'd love one, but a good SAA clone costs half that price around here.
I'll stick to my SAAs.
NOW we talking! yes, I spin too!I only paid about $100.00 for mine.
Of course it shoot's BB's, using CO2 cartridges, and it makes a good fidgit spinner at time too.
is that a real one!!!I like my Frontier 44 Special a lot.
View attachment 1194909
Yeah… Balance was funny. but that hammer look MEAN!IMO the price is reasonable. However, I highly recommend handling it first. My father bought an Uberti replica of a S&W No.3 and handling it cured me of any desire for one, for two reasons. First, I didn't like how it balanced. Second and more importantly, the sights are horrendous, even by fixed sight revolver standards.
I didn’t understand why it’s 2x the cost of their SAA clone. The quality is exactly the same, finish - and such.I had one of these a while back and I never could get used to it no matter how hard I tried so I sold it.
that true! I bet their was a Uberti run of these coming in the country. I haven’t seen them on the shelves for 2 years. I’ll take a stroll this week around to see who else is getting Scholfeids in. I limited my gun spending to July, So I have to be picky & smart about gun purchasesI don’t know all that is involved in the production of a SAA vs. Schofield but the only similarity between the two in this Layman’s eyes are that they are single action. I think comparing the two is apples vs. oranges, I wouldn’t get to wrapped in the weeds around the cost difference between a SAA and a Schofield reproduction.
I have an Uberti Schofield. I didn't pay that much for mine, but inflation is what it is.Do you think $1200 is too much? Have not seen one for a few years. I remember them only being $1050~
I would have grabbed that in a heartbeat.I have one of these in 38 SW, it was only $150 or less a few months ago.
View attachment 1194959