Zach S
Member
Oddly enough, I'm not surprised. Didnt they detain a guy at an airport for wearing a transformers t shirt?introduce the ban for the UK only
"Cool, that's Optimus - OMG HE'S GOT A SWORD!!!"
Oddly enough, I'm not surprised. Didnt they detain a guy at an airport for wearing a transformers t shirt?introduce the ban for the UK only
We're going to be switching all of our videos over to Rifletube.com just to avoid such headaches and whining MMM-types.
Gun mags are freely available in the UK including ‘Guns and Ammo’Gem wrote: An editor of a US gun magazine told me that they had to censor cover art for the UK edition a few years ago. I don't know if they still sell US gun mags over there.
Damien wrote: Wasn't it the brits who were complaining about the Shoot Em Up poster because a gun was featured prominently on it? Seems like par for the course with those people.
In that case, wouldn't it be better to cure the disease, instead of the symptom?Ben86 said:...What this ban is really aimed at is islamo-terrorist propoganda movies...
If they did that, I don't think Dity Harry's day will be madeSuperlite27 said:... since the depiction of weapons in YouTube videos is now verboten, won't they have to ban actual theater movies since they display intimidating use of weapons?
If it wasn't, would Youtube go out of their way to voluntarily censor their videos for the British market only?Damien said:...Wasn't it the brits who were complaining about the Shoot Em Up poster because a gun was featured prominently on it?...
Chisel Head wrote: So, any kind of terrorism to happen in Britain ends up being poetic justice
I fail to see how limiting the content of UK youtube will decrease any crime.
If they cant post on UK youtube what is to stop them going to regular youtube or looking up any other type of violence one would wish to see on the internet.
You're right. I should have worded the comment carefully. I should have added that poetic justice is justified, as long as it affects only those guilty and not innocent people. In which case, I referred to condoning politicians and the businessmen conducting this dirty business. Since your form of government isn't democratic, I couldn't honestly imply that the constituents who vote those politicians into office could be held directly responsibleCalibre44 said:...That type of comment is exceptionally low round, extremely offensive and not welcome on this forum.
Read the rules for posting!...
Fine. We can always find ways to outsmart those who wish to treat us like small children. We could always view what we want, through a proxy server. But, nevertheless, it's somehow insulting to usdrgrenthum said:...i dont know if anyone elsse has pointed this out, but its the internet. If they cant post on UK youtube what is to stop them going to regular youtube or looking up any other type of violence one would wish to see on the internet...
On some sites, I get the old 404. I used to think that was I.P. related. But, like your friend, maybe it was somehow segregated by country.PILMAM said:...I had a German friend trying to view a video about Neo Nazi gangs, and it said he wasn't allowed to view that video from his country...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2007/nov/21/asa.advertising?gusrc=rss&feed=mediaNo it wasn’t ‘the brits’, it was probably some leftly tree hugging pussy who complained (you’ve got them in the US too). The poster was not taken down. Film posters involving guns are all over the place over here including on buses