I agree completely with the OP and Bartholomew Roberts.
I think that there is a tendency in gun culture to distrust or hate anything that costs less than what you paid for it. I think that Bushmaster suffers from the same syndrome as Kimber in that, the more units you sell, the more problems will happen, whether or not it represents a higher RATE of problems.
I think that you could do a test of different rifles from various pricepoints with the mfr labels covered, and the vast majority of shooters wouldn't know the difference. I think the extra features you get on more expensive rifles represent the law of diminishing returns, in that you will pay a LOT more than the return you get in performance.
The Chart is worthless. The only carrier key I have had come loose was.......A MILITARY ISSUE "PROPERLY" STAKED KEY.
Most rifles will work for most shooters most of the time. If you get an AR, and regard it as a tool you will be constantly tweaking and upgrading, I think it makes little if any difference which one you get. The only one I would avoid is Vulcan/Hesse, and I still think you could throw one of THOSE in the covered-label test and most people wouldn't know it.