Don't sue if you're too fat!

Status
Not open for further replies.

BB93YJ

Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2003
Messages
269
The firearms related portion of this is in the question I pose below, because, to me, it is exactly the same principle:

Is it just me, or shouldn't there be some sort of connection here between this principle, espoused in this proposed bill, passed by the House, and protection against frivilous lawsuits against the firearms industry?

http://www.money.telegraph.co.uk/mo...242&sSheet=/money/2004/03/12/ixfrontcity.html

Don't sue if you're too fat, rule US politicians
By Simon English in New York (Filed: 12/03/2004)


America may be the fattest nation on the planet but politicians have ruled that the fast food industry should not be liable.

In a rare victory for burger chains enduring a barrage of abuse, the US House of Representatives backed legislation known as the "cheeseburger bill" that blocks lawsuits blaming fast food for making people fat.

The Personal Responsibility in Food Consumption Act will save the fast food industry from being bankrupted by frivolous lawsuits, say proponents, though it still has to get through the Senate.

The vote came one day after the US government reported that obesity may soon overtake tobacco as the leading cause of preventable death.

There are 400,000 deaths a year related to poor diet and physical inactivity, up from 300,000 10 years ago.

Ric Keller, the Florida Republican who sponsored the bill, is a self-proclaimed "chubby guy" with a taste for cheeseburgers. "This is about common sense and personal responsibility," he said.

James Sensenbrenner, another Republican, said fat people should "look in the mirror" when looking for someone to blame, a point of view that has the backing of most of the public, according to polls.

Opponents of the bill say it should be up to the courts to decide which lawsuits are frivolous, arguing that the threat of legal action keeps companies honest.

Legal activists who targeted McDonald's point to the success they have already had in persuading the company to change its behaviour, such as dropping "Super Size" portions and putting salad on the menu.

John Banzhaf, the law professor who led the campaign against tobacco companies and who is an adviser to fast food litigants, believes he is using the law to fight obesity.

Critics call him "a man who lives by his writs", "the Osama bin Laden of torts" and note that his car license plate reads "SUE BAST".

McDonald's welcomed the bill. "This issue isn't about any one restaurant or any particular food, it's about personal responsibility and individual decisions," said a statement.

Tackling obesity is the biggest healthcare issue in the US. According to government statistics 130m Americans - 64pc of the population - is overweight.

11 January 2004: America takes the biscuit - and the burger and the bagel
26 July 2003: Would you like a lawyer with that?
 
arguing that the threat of legal action keeps companies honest.

How will it keep them honest in this case? Making sure they don't put too many fat grams in something people are voluntarily paying for and consuming?
 
This could help in the Senate...maybe. Perhaps gun manufacturer protection could be added as an amendment since it is similar/identical to this bill but the other anti-RKBA amendments would not be added since they are now not so closely related. Maybe they could write a sort of “catch-all†bill to protect against frivolous lawsuits. I know its probably wishful thinking, but they always seem to amaze me.
 
"OK, Porky, drop the cheeseburger and move away. Keep your hands in plain view . . ."

The fundamental stupidity of it all just boggles the mind, who else could possibly be responsible for what YOU put in YOUR mouth??? Does this mean one could sue one's drug dealer for 'causing' one's addiciton? (I suspect 'street justice' would limit that liability pretty quickly) It is only eclipsed by the fact that there are lawyers out there willing to file these suits. So, we need a law? :barf: :fire: :barf:

There is a direct parallel of this precident to the gun suits. Who else but the operator of the firearm is responsible for how it is used?
 
It's not their fault. They couldn't help themselves. They are the result of a poor (___) fill in the blank. Their whole life is beyond their control. Uncle Kerry needs to take care of all the sheeples. He will make the mean old people who made them eat pay.

Just go to the all-you-can-eat buffet sometime and you will see the next class action law suite in the making.
 
Now if they would leave off the "in Food Consumption" part, and just make it a blanket law that forbids suits in Federal courts where the "damages" are the result of a free choice, then I'd be very happy with this bill.


Of course, they have no authority to meddle in what goes on in State courts.


Doesn't mean they won't, though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top