I too received the same response from Kimber.
Here is the text of my reply;
Dear Mr. Antonovich,
Thank you for your timely response. After much discussion of the issue in the online forums, it was decided that this was probably a misrepresentation of the intent of Mr. Busse. If we had been more discerning in our reading of the article, we could have saved you the trouble and the time. My most sincere apologies to Mr. Busse as well as yourself and your company for what was obviously my mistake in not being a more cautious reader.
Again, I humbly apologize and in future considerations, I vow to use the good sense my mother gave me.
Sincerely,
XXXXXXX
_________
Regarding hunters v. RKBA, I believe the most recent shenanigans involving S. 1805, specifically a 'study' to redefine armor piercing ammo may well do what has been needed for a while. That is, alert the hunters to very real threat to their small corner of the RKBA issue. Furthermore, I do hope that by spreading the word through the hunting community, we can initiate them to the RKBA force. Another few million to mobilize at the threat of rights restrictions is a good thing.
So, instead of continuing to point out our differences, we really should be saying, "Look, they
are after
your rights
too. Here is the
proof." We need to work together more. Conversly, when hunting issues come up, let them know we can be counted on. Like the point MrChicken made;
That doesn't mean that they are concerned about all gun rights either
Right? Wrong? More ideas?