Lima Ohio Swat team kills mom, shoots infant.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Blackfork

Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2006
Messages
1,219
Location
East Texas
Woman killed, child injured during Lima drug raid
Greg Sowinski | [email protected] - 01.05.2008
LIMA — 3:50 p.m., Jan. 5 — The Lima police SWAT team was conducting a “high-risk” drug raid and knew children were possibly in the house when an officer shot and killed a mother and injured her 1-year-old child, Lima police Chief Greg Garlock said.

“This is a terrible situation that resulted from a very dangerous situation that occurs when a high-risk search warrant is executed,” Garlock said.

The raid was the result of a “long-term investigation” by the department’s PACE unit into the sale of illegal drugs from the home, which is owned by 6th Ward City Councilman Derry Glenn, who is the landlord. Crack cocaine and marijuana were found inside the home after the shooting, Garlock said.

The subject of the raid was Anthony Terry, 31, the boyfriend of Tarika Wilson, the 26-year-old woman killed by police. Terry is in custody in the Allen County jail charged with suspicion of possession of crack cocaine, Garlock said.

Terry is expected to appear at a bond hearing Monday in Lima Municipal Court, Garlock said.

The raid took place shortly after 8 p.m. Friday at 218 E. Third St. Garlock said the SWAT team is highly skilled and has conducted thousands of other raids without problems. Such raids always are dangerous and “high risk,” he said.

The last time an officer shot and killed a citizen was Aug. 23, 2000. Michael Hildebrandt was killed by two SWAT team officers after he reportedly set fire to his room at the Lima Rescue Home and had a knife in his hand. The shooting occurred during a six-hour standoff.

A vigil is scheduled for 5 p.m. today at the Cheryl Allen Southside Center, 1802 S. Central Ave.

The shooting drew an angry crowd of about 50 people, who screamed at police and questioned officers as they investigated the incident.
One woman screamed, “Where is my daughter? Where is my daughter at? Tell me!”

Garlock on Saturday apologized for the delay saying police had to obtain a second search warrant, which took several hours, to enter the home and process it as a crime scene following the fatal shooting.
The injured child was flown by medical helicopter to a hospital in Columbus and is expected to survive, said Lima Police Major Kevin Martin.

The child’s aunt, Tania Wilson, said the Sincere Wilson was shot in the hand and arm. The child is out of surgery at Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Columbus, she said. A neighbor, Stephanie Allsup, said she’d seen the beginning of the incident. She said her dog began barking at the window, so she looked out. She said she saw what looked like a raid, with officials heading toward the house two doors down.She said she heard a couple of pops that she thought might have been gunfire, and then police began to swarm the neighborhood.“I saw them take the baby out and carry it to the ambulance, and then they left,” Allsup said.She said she didn’t see anyone else removed from the home.Lima police called in the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Identification and Investigation to take over the investigation since the shooting involved a Lima police officer, Garlock said.
Garlock called that agency, a branch of the Ohio Attorney General’s office, to ensure fairness for the community and fairness to his department. Garlock did not identify the Lima officer involved in the shooting.

Garlock was not saying much on how the shooting occurred. He said that will come out during the investigation.

Reporter Kate Lohnes contributed to this story.Read more about this story in Sunday’s edition of The Lima News.
 
From Article Posted Above:: The subject of the raid was Anthony Terry, 31, the boyfriend of Tarika Wilson, the 26-year-old woman killed by police. Terry is in custody in the Allen County jail charged with suspicion of possession of crack cocaine, Garlock said.

So it is pure speculation that he has crack? Wonderful, so because he MAY have had crack, his house was raided.

Another victory in the war on drugs. Now that some crack and marijuana are off of the street the citizens can sleep safer in their beds. :rolleyes:
 
That's terrible for the innocent child.

But.. not a lot of info about how things unfolded.

Wall penetration by an AR round?
Was the mom holding an infant and firing?

ETA: The article assumes the round was from the SWAT team, but states no information was given.
Who did what to cause the other party to fire?
 
"Wonderful, so because he MAY have had crack, his house was raided."

Read the article again...

"Crack cocaine and marijuana were found inside the home after the shooting, Garlock said."
 
Bringing up a child in that enviornment - you get what you deserve. No sympathy for the mother. As for the infant, sad that occured but maybe the baby will now be raised in a betetr surrounding without a crack doping mother.
With so little detail given, it's great to see everyone jump on the side against the cops. Semms like some maybe favor the lifestyle the crack-mom was keeping the child in. :cuss:
 
"Wonderful, so because he MAY have had crack, his house was raided."

Read the article again...

"Crack cocaine and marijuana were found inside the home after the shooting, Garlock said."

Who the fsck cares?

Show me the victim. Explain to me why a victimless crime is... a crime.

You want to use crack and screw up your brain... your bad. Versus... you want to use crack and screw up your brain, we'll come and kill you.

Yea, that's justice all right.

Koos (no, Koos is not pronounced anything like Quis, but it's close enough)
 
(The raid was the result of a “long-term investigation” )

...If it was a long term investigation, the "raid" could have surely been conducted more safely. I think the SWAT just like the adreneline rush while busting down doors.
 
Explain to me why a victimless crime is... a crime.


Victimless crime? Tell that to the people who are robbed by junkies to support their drug habit, the people who are killed in drive-by shootings and gang wars over drug spots, and innocent family members who are torn apart by the drug use of their loved ones.


Seriously - what a foolish comment. The drug trade in this country is FAR from victimless.
 
No reason to pile up on the cops without more information. If it is a bad shoot then talk about them all you want. It's an unfortunate incident, but that's all we really know right now. I love this site, but sometimes it amazes me how anti-cop/government it has become.

The woman has her child in a crack house with her crack dealing boyfriend and some how it is the cop's fault that she and her child got shot? Simply ridiculous. Cops don't generally raid crack houses for the fun of it. Should we just let the trash fill our streets? Somebody has to clean it up, right? I don't want the job of doing it, but I'm not gonna sit here and criticize the ones who are until I know I have a reason to.
 
Victimless crime? Tell that to the people who are robbed by junkies to support their drug habit, the people who are killed in drive-by shootings and gang wars over drug spots, and innocent family members who are torn apart by the drug use of their loved ones.
Most of that is the result of the criminalization of drugs. Were they legal, prices would be low, turf fights would be trivial/nonexistent (no money in it with the low prices, so why risk your life?), etc. Compare it to the prohibition of alcohol. It's equally as foolish to view it in such a narrow manner.

That being said, put this one on the list of botched raids.


The woman has her child in a crack house with her crack dealing boyfriend and some how it is the cop's fault that she and her child got shot?
Granted she should not have put herself or her child in that environment, but the police should know their target. Now, if she was threatening them with a weapon (do not know, not enough information), that's different.
 
Originally posted by John BT: "Wonderful, so because he MAY have had crack, his house was raided."

Read the article again...

"Crack cocaine and marijuana were found inside the home after the shooting, Garlock said."
I did read that.

However they never said it was his. They suspect it of being his. Why didnt they charge him with possession rather than suspicion of possession?

Doesnt that sound scary, you can be charged on suspicion of breaking a law?
 
ww.wtol.com/global/story.asp?s=7583987

"When they got inside, the tactical team was attacked by two pit bulls and at some point shots were fired."
 
www.drugpolicycentral.com/bot/article/toledoblade6484.htm

"He said officers were aware that children were inside the home because there were toys in the yard outside and on the front porch.

Officers used at least one stun grenade to create a loud noise prior to entering the residence, but the charges were detonated outside, the chief said.

"Because of the possibility that we had children in there, they were not lobbed inside," he said.

Two pit bulls that were inside the home also were shot by police, Chief Garlock said. One of the dogs died from its injuries."
 
The Lima police SWAT team was conducting a “high-risk” drug raid

Are all drug raids now automatically considered "high-risk?" I see no mention about firearm possession by a felon, or anything that would lead me to believe there were even weapons in the house.

Why is it that possession of cocaine or marijuana requires kevlar body armor and assault rifles to execute a warrant?

:cuss:
 
Yea, that's justice all right.

Am I correct in assuming you are making a judgment and voicing your opinion, even though you were not at the scene? Most people (not all unfortunately) here in America don't believe everything that is written in the press. After all, no one on this board was at the scene or was privy to the information the SWAT team had prior to the entry of the premises. Maybe in your homeland of South Africa it's common to jump on police investigation/shootings, immediately after a news release. Apparently your media/press is 100% accurate in reporting the facts. An outside state investigative agency (BCI) will be investigating the procedures followed by the PD. So, apparently the local PD feels proper tactics were followed with the information they received to execute a search warrant. The wounding of the child is sad and unfortunate, along with death of the adult, but cases such as described are not scripted. Sometimes the endings are sad and tragic.
 
most amusing to me is that many of the folks here wouldn't go in that neighborhood on a bet much less in that house. but are the quiclest to second guess and ponticicate on how it should be done. wheres that pic of the large dude dressed all tactical with the caption "don't worry sir we're from te internet"
similar to the nonathletes monday morning quarterbacking.
 
I was wondering how long it would be before someone suggested the legalization of cocaine and marijuana. How much sense does that make? We have a big enough problem with junkies begging for crack money and stealing to get it when begging doesn't work. Of course the solution must be to make the substance legal. That's just what we need. Make it legal so that more people will try it. Then more people get addicted and we get even more crack heads begging in the streets. That's just a wonderful idea. Next we'll get rid of speed limits and stop signs. No reason I shouldn't be able to drive however I want. It doesn't effect anybody but me, right?
 
the SWAT team ... has conducted thousands of other raids
Yup, I think I see the problem here.
Such raids always are dangerous and “high risk,”
I agree. Maybe we shouldn't do them as often.

This sounds like the same sort of respect for safety and human life that we saw the last time a government agent shot a mother, endangering her infant child.
 
FREEZE..... Before we slam the police we Need more details,



Has anyone thought of the fact she might have been pointing the gun at the baby's head?

or,

She was using the baby as a shield, armed, and was going to shoot?

We don't know what is going on so before we dismantle the police wait for more details.
 
Whenever anything like this happens, we automatically want to point fingers. However, endlessly rehashing the situation will not in any way mitigate the tragedy of a woman's death and the wounding of a child.

It would, of course, be nice to know why the police decided a raid was the most prudent course of action. The devil's in the details, as they say.
 
What difference does it make what the peons think? The shooters will get off, whether it was egregious malice or incompetence or not.
 
"It would, of course, be nice to know why the police decided a raid was the most prudent course of action. The devil's in the details, as they say."


based on your experience what would be a better way to handle it"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top