Modern equivalent of the "Liberator" pistol (or rifle)?

Status
Not open for further replies.
What would be the purpose of these? Seems like a novelty to me. Why would we drop them in iraq? Seems to me there's plenty of arms over there already.

Iraq isn't the last war that will ever be fought. There are plenty of countries with repressive governments and a disarmed populace - North Korea, Cuba, some parts of Africa, Venezuela and Bolivia in 10 years...Heck, you could probably even add China to that list.
 
At risk of a bit of thread drift...

Hrm - the "Field Expedient Firearms" link has some interesting designs!

The magazine process is particularly interesting - I always assumed that'd be the hardest part to build and make work, but it looks pretty simple.

Seems to me though.. if you can get the ammunition to run in it, can't you get the weapon at the same time? If so, what's the point of workshop buzzguns in an insurrection?


To the "modernized Liberator" idea.. honestly, as many surplus arms from the last fifty years that are still floating around and perfectly serviceable, I'm not certain it'd be worth it. Why airlift new manufactured Liberators when you can drop some twenty year old AKs?

But if we were to try it, the aforementioned plastic cast around a barrel makes sense. A simple single-shot action would be just fine.


Finally, I'd like to see a nice inexpensive repro of the Liberator. A rifled barrel would be an okay compromise to avoid the NFA, and I bet it could be made by the folks making 1911 barrels without much adjustment to their tooling. :)


-K
 
IMHO, with something like this, NFA doesn't really come to bear.

Personally, I'd think of something a bit larger - Along the lines of a 10-12" barreled 12 gauge or 20 gauge. Something like that could also be largely plastic.

Or take a piece of steel, and drill a hole that'll hold a rimmed .38 or .44 cartridge. All you have to do then is rig a firing mechanism that'll keep the case from coming back.

Between Wal-Mart, Home Depot and Harbor Freight, I can make darn near anything.
 
I forgot about the "cia deer gun" from the vietnam era.

9mm, simpler than the FP45

http://www.securityarms.com/20010315/galleryfiles/0900/968.htm


I'm fairly certain that most of us could figure out what was needed given 2 chunks of steel, a drill, an elastic band, any rimmed cartridge, and an hour's prep time.

Or a big block of wood, a nail, an elastic, and a .22lr.

Or a pipe, a 12 gauge shell, etc etc etc.
 
I think the Sten SMG was also mass produced, and dropped. Far more effective.
In todays world, maybe a better choice would be to take advantage of a modern/old firearm widely available cheaply, i.e., the Mosin M44. Drop it with a box of ammo, pictographic instructions....
 
Various shotgun and rifled barrels can be had for $5-25. A lathe would be nice for cutting and chambering, but isn't required. .38 Special chamber can be cut with drill bits.

David
 
Glock 19 ish pistol

If we are talking US Gov't prices meaning no tax, and the quantity discount of 1 million units, then you could make a polymer framed, striker fired, semi auto like a Glock with a stamped steel slide like a SIG 228.
 
Liberator rifles? How about the AK-47?

Is there anyone - anyplace in the world - capable of building a million AKs for 25 bucks apiece?

Considering that low-cap WASRs retail for 170 bucks here in the states (in single-piece quantities), I guess it might be feasible...Each rifle would have to include at least one magazine to qualify.

If "stock" AKs didn't meet the price mark, you could cut costs by having them built without the magazine well, gas block, tube and piston - essentially, make them single-shots! :D
 
I think that the spirit of the thread assumes a thoroughly occupied country, sort of like Nazis running Germany, or America in 'Red Dawn', that sort of thing. And I think the author was implying that they didn't need to be airdropped by a foreign power, they could be manufactured by locals.


plexreticle said:
NEF rifle in .223, short barrel and take down wire stock would almost be perfect.

Yea that's the stuff. And some sort of lumps on top to sight by. Maybe single-shot rifle, with a receiver just made out of a chunk of steel. You cut a slot straight through it so you can feed a cartridge into the chamber by hand, and then secure it with a bolt that's a door that slides horizontally into place by hand on tracks cut into the receiver, you could even flip it over for right or left hand use. Have a little hole cut into the 'bolt' over the primer, and have the hammer and firing pin combined to a single unit like old revolvers. You could even eliminate a trigger, just holding the hammer back and releasing it when you got sights on the target. That would make a total of two moving parts and one spring.

Not sure about extraction, but considering the nature of the weapon circumstances suggest that you either won't need or get to make a second shot right away.

MikeJackmin said:
The purpose of a Liberator pistol was to allow a civilian to kill an enemy soldier at close range and take his weapon. The gun had to be cheap, easy to conceal, reliable, durable, mechanically obvious, and powerful. It did not have to be accurate, pretty, or quick to reload.

Many inexpensive guns sold now can meet or exceed those requirements, but none are available in the five dollar range.

Korean and Vietnam war flak vests were resistant to .45ACP. No occupying army is going to be unarmoured against pistol calibers.

Hence you have to bump it up to an intermediate rifle cartridge, and even then you may have to aim carefully.

And is a US soldier in Iraq going to let an unknown civilian get within 3 yards while his hands are reaching for something? That might be a failing of the Liberators, they're TOO short range. The hole principle is damed near suicidal. Hell, the best uses is probably for when the Nazis are kicking down the door, so you can take a shot or two at them and then finish yourself off before they can take you away to spend the last few days of your life in unbearable torture and then die hanging on a meathook.

Hence a modern Liberator should be able to fire accurately at targets closer to 50m away. Instead of the rolling French countryside, you've got rolling suburbs, and any tactic would likely involve picking off patrolling soldiers on the other side of a street, then ducking behind a house and running like hell.

Even the threat of such attacks would necessitate less frequent patrols with greater numbers of soldiers, so it's really a great boon to any resistance movement. (since 1 or 2 soldiers patrolling an area would get murdered quickly) Eventually the resistance might get weapons off the dead, but you shouldn't count on it.
 
Last edited:
The purpose of a Liberator pistol was to allow a civilian to kill an enemy soldier at close range and take his weapon. The gun had to be cheap, easy to conceal, reliable, durable, mechanically obvious, and powerful. It did not have to be accurate, pretty, or quick to reload.
As lucky pointed out, body armor would probably complicate things today. It would be interesting to know how many countries issue their troops armor in quantity and if its hard or soft. Plus to my understanding the liberator wasn't really all that useful then.

Done with the government's consent I think you could make a mostly plastic derringer that would be cheap and give several shots. Without the government's order I think the liberator gun would be putting local machine equipment to work turning out crude but functional guns. I think you could make a very serviceable zip gun in an evening with modern tools.
 
Lucky: thats not a bad idea.

I am really going to have to look into this some more. I don't know if I can keep it under $25 but I wont know tell I price some steel.

A really easy to make stock that comes to mind is the one on the scorpion sub gun.

Make it out of round steel and bend it to the same shape. Weld a washer on the inside of each side and thats your pivot point.

I know if I built a riffle or shot gun there is a minimum barrel length for each.

Now what I want to know is with a hand gun what makes it a hand gun and not a riffle with a short barrel? Is it the round it fires? Is it the barrel length?
 
The Liberator (The Old) & The Downsizer (The New) I Think!;)
 

Attachments

  • LiberatorHand.jpg
    LiberatorHand.jpg
    9.7 KB · Views: 58
  • downsizer2.jpg
    downsizer2.jpg
    48.6 KB · Views: 126
Liberator + Marketing = Kel-Tec

...there's lots of pistols that have a very low manufacturing cost.
 
Now what I want to know is with a hand gun what makes it a hand gun and not a riffle with a short barrel?
(7) The term “rifle” means a weapon designed or redesigned, made or remade, and intended to be fired from the shoulder and designed or redesigned and made or remade to use the energy of an explosive to fire only a single projectile through a rifled bore for each single pull of the trigger.
(8) The term “short-barreled rifle” means a rifle having one or more barrels less than sixteen inches in length and any weapon made from a rifle (whether by alteration, modification, or otherwise) if such weapon, as modified, has an overall length of less than twenty-six inches.
(29) The term “handgun” means—
(A) a firearm which has a short stock and is designed to be held and fired by the use of a single hand; and
(B) any combination of parts from which a firearm described in subparagraph (A) can be assembled.
18 USC 921
 
NFA does not apply in the event the things are made for use either in an "occupied country" scenario, or to be dropped into such a scenario.

And I think that the liberator wasn't even meant to be aimed - I've played with one. Get close enough to Jerry, using whatever field expedient means, including getting him drunk on fine French wine, stick it in his ear or gut, and yank on the trigger. Take his rifle and/or pistol.
 
It's crude, and dangerous...

Anybody could make a crude muzzle-loading pistol or shotgun. Just buy a pack of large egg sinkers for fishing, or sinkers that approximate buckshot. Large steel ball bearings or bolts will work too. If you want to fire one projectile, take one egg sinker to the hardware store and select the pipe that it fits into closest. Buy a pipe cap for the pipe too, and some fine wire. Cap the pipe, drill hole in the pipe or cap, and rig up an ignition system. Wrap the pipe in the wire to reinforce it. It's probably a good idea to mount this to a stock of some sort, so go back to the hardware store and buy some lumber.
For firing you can use a battery and a flashlight bulb, rigged up with a trigger switch, or you can percussion prime it using a strike-anywhere match.
To acquire ammo, snag a few books of matches. Cut off the heads and use them as "powder". You would load this just like a BP gun.
Firing it is NOT safe; this is a weapon of last resort. You're just as likely to kill yourself as an enemy with it.
There's no need to dump these out of airplanes, anyone who wants a gun and has access to the basic components can have one in a few hours. All you really need to do is print up a few million leaflets of instructions in the appropriate language and dump em over enemy territory. Reports of bans on pipes, flashlights, matches, fishing equipment, or ball bearings will tell you that a formerly unarmed populace is now armed and causing problems for their oppressors.

FWIW,the way Reagan pried the Soviets from Afghanistan was he had the CIA set up a "pipeline" that funneled weapons and money into the country and surrounding areas. The Soviets then had to contend with a proxy war where they consistently lost the moral highground while Uncle Sam didn't get his hands dirty, and thus wouldn't get tired of it. The Afghans could have built these crude weapons, but they probably would have had better than 95% casualty rates actually using them.
The proxy war strategy is now being used against us by the Iranians. They never engage U.S. forces in combat but they're happy to supply weapons, technical expertise, and cash to the insurgents. Of course, they aren't supplying one shot deals to enable supply off the enemy. They send powerful bombs that trash armored vehicles and complicate ground operations.
 
FWIW,the way Reagan pried the Soviets from Afghanistan was he had the CIA set up a "pipeline" that funneled weapons and money into the country and surrounding areas. The Soviets then had to contend with a proxy war where they consistently lost the moral highground

There was a moral high-ground in the Soviet/Afghan War? Last time I checked, that conflict was a pathetic and sad attempt by a superpower to grab a strategically rich territory by force with another superpower shooting itself in the foot by arming the territory with hundreds of millions of dollars in weapons.

Also, Carter and Reagan didn't set up a "pipeline" to send weapons to Afghanistan--that would indicate that they did it with some regard to being secret. We brasenly shippied hundreds of millions of dollars of arms technology to the mujahedin (you know, the guys we are currently trying to blow up) and told them to go to town in the defense of capitalism. There weren't so much shipments of guns as it was mostly Stinger and other types of shoulder fired missles, mines (which have killed more children than soldiers from both sides combined), and grenade launchers. Basically, all of the stuff being shot at American and NATO troops was supplied by Carter and Reagan in the 80's.




And I think that the liberator wasn't even meant to be aimed - I've played with one. Get close enough to Jerry, using whatever field expedient means, including getting him drunk on fine French wine, stick it in his ear or gut, and yank on the trigger. Take his rifle and/or pistol.

I'm not sure about this, but I think this might be the problem with the whole idea behind the Liberator in general. The above story is kind of fanciful and it seems pretty tough to pull off (outside of a place like Moracco in the 30-40's which really did have enemies mingling in the streets because the country was offically international territory) in a realistic situation without either getting yourself killed or calling lots of attention to yourself.

Besides the fact that I don't think there are any situations right now that would justify dropping weapons (outside of perhaps North Korea) I'm not sure if they would ever really work.

Have there ever been any studies regarding the effectiveness of the Liberator pistols in occupied France? The Liberators were a complete sucess in this country---they've managed to become one of the most desired and beloved pistols in history because of the American imagination, but I'm just not sure if they have that much combat effectiveness.

If another Liberator was ever made, I think a major need would be some sort of improvised suppressor which would help the shooter to conceal himself from groups of soldiers who would obviously be drawn to the sound of gunfire. Suppressors need not be very expensive (and they can be crudely created) but I think they would change the little pistol from something of extremely limited use to something that would really help resistance fighters.
 
Slam Bang shotguns!

http://nw0.info/files/eBooks and Au...rms.-.saxon.kurt.-.the.four.winds.shotgun.rar

Simple as hell to build. Find a suitable pipe for a 12 gauge or whatever caliber you feel like, then find another pipe to slide over the pipe, and an endcap for the sliding pipe. For the firing pin, you can use a nail hammered into a piece of wood, the wood is the breechblock, too. You can glue the piece of wood into the end cap, too.

You can build this gun however big you want, in any caliber you got imagination for.

You could make an improv SMG really easily, too. Not necissarily a sten, but an open bolt in most any caliber is easy.

My cool idea is a double derringer type design in .223 and 9mm, the 2 easiest to get calibers during a big war with UN soldiers and black helicopters :p Short trigger pull fires the .223 barrel, long trigger pull fires the 9mm barrel. Relies on a striker you manually cock. Imagine the muzzleblast of .223 from 3-4 inch barrel......

Really folks, instead of stocking up on like 17 AR-15s or whatever, you should just go buy tons of ammo and a CNC equipped machine ship. You'll have an unlimited supply of guns, in any caliber or operation you want.

http://putstuff.putfile.com/52670/5058377

Here's a link to the original Liberator pistol blueprints, in case you're interested.
 
So if what I understand is correct. So long as you made a slam bang that had a barrel length of 18 inches or more it would be legal?
 
As long as it has an overall length of 26 inches, then you're OK. I dont get why you'd bother with NFA compliance, though, seeing as it is a pipe when you take the other part off, but whatever floats your boat.

I'd suggest just making the whole pipe 27 inches if you want to be legal, or making a stock.

And for test firing it, you should probably tape it to a tree, and hit it with a hammer. If it doesnt explode, it works.

I think with any other non shotgun or .410 caliber, it can be any length you want, so long as you put rifling in it somehow. It would be considered a pistol if you had rifling in it. It could be considered an AOW, like a pengun is, but this isnt meant to look like a pen, so legally it's unknown.

Please dont call ATF asking for legality by any means, you might give them ideas......

Really, in real life where ATF men don't hide in your closet, you can basically make a slambang anyway you want.
 
I was just thinking more about modification of the basic design to make it some thing with a little more function. Simple hammer, trigger, and stock.

If you did that you would have a very basic breach loading shotgun.
 
Oh, well, that kinda defeats the beauty of it. The slambang doesnt look much like a gun, is very effective, very cheap, can be made by most anyone/ect.

There's also another shotgun design made in america that might be somewhat what you are thinking.

http://www.linkbase.org/homemade-shotgun/ (advertisements not really work safe)

That design is kinda, well, very crappy, compared to the slambang.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top