engineer151515
Member
Local am radio news reporter - probably just reading from a script - said something about US Army recruitment that just did not make sense to me. Thought I'd share it and see what the good folks at THR thought about it.
The report stated that Army recruitment goals for the upcoming months would be 8,000 to 10,000 new recruits. Army enlistment for the preceeding months was substantially lower than these numbers but the increase in recruitment was needed "because of the casualites in Iraq".
??????????????
Let me see. We've lost 2423 brave souls since Mar 03. 22% of those lost were through non-combat related incidents (accidents). And because of these losses, we now need 8,000 to 10,000 new recruits per month?
I realize people are not enlisting / re-enlisting because of the war but didn't this just sound like another barbed poke from our less-than-fair-and-balanced press?
I'll stop now.
source: http://icasualties.org/oif/stats.aspx
Cause of Death Total Percentage
Hostile fire 1886 77.8%
Non-combat related 536 22.1%
Unknown 1 0.1%
Total 2423
The report stated that Army recruitment goals for the upcoming months would be 8,000 to 10,000 new recruits. Army enlistment for the preceeding months was substantially lower than these numbers but the increase in recruitment was needed "because of the casualites in Iraq".
??????????????
Let me see. We've lost 2423 brave souls since Mar 03. 22% of those lost were through non-combat related incidents (accidents). And because of these losses, we now need 8,000 to 10,000 new recruits per month?
I realize people are not enlisting / re-enlisting because of the war but didn't this just sound like another barbed poke from our less-than-fair-and-balanced press?
I'll stop now.
source: http://icasualties.org/oif/stats.aspx
Cause of Death Total Percentage
Hostile fire 1886 77.8%
Non-combat related 536 22.1%
Unknown 1 0.1%
Total 2423