I dunno. There's something very weird about a Harris bipod on an AK.
Yeah, it doesn't look right. Never really though of the AK as a bi-pod worthy rifle.
I am interested in the cost ratio of accessories to rifle.
Think RPK
I agree. The only accessory on my Saiga is a Surefire X300. I had orginally planned to mount a 6P in a Vltor ring, but that setup proved to be too bulky and heavy. X300 is just right.Kymasabe said:Personally, I like my AK's stripped down and as light as possible. Minimalist.
Must be real fun to tear down and clean....
Uhh, no. The RPK is a LMG, not an assault rifle...which the AK is. Two rifles that have different purposes.
Vachss said:The RPK uses basically the same mechanisms of the AK and shoots the same round, only it has a longer barrel..and yet you say that is is not a assault weapon? GUNS 101 My friend the RPK qualifies as an assault weapon..
And what, you're basing this on the barrel length?
So if I snap a 30 rd magazine in the RPK is it suddenly "assault worthy" because I am not using in a LMG fashion?
They both have the same purpose, one is capable of doing it at greater distances that's all...they are both "assault style weapons"...and both guns would be excellent squad support weapons...with or without bipods..and the base RPK has a bipod..My gun is just fancier..lol
And yes my gun may be a bit much for some..eh..don't really care..
If they're chocolate chip and peanut butter, I'll take the whole durn tray!Just relax shark..its a forum and nobody wants your cookies..