Ruger 10mm revolver

[The Evangelist Cowboy]

I think this particular gun is great for one who wants to hunt deer/hogs with a handgun but does not want to deal with .44Mag recoil. I'd also ream it to 10mmMag but I like weird stuff.



Fast reloads in competition.

I'd stick with .357 then, Ive taken both game with .357's and its a dandy killer, the 10mm can do that to, but in that platform I dont see any edge that outbeats the .357 (higher weights but not as good trajectory) unless the 10mm Magnum was used.

 

[CraigC]

There are no .357's in that sort of optic-friendly platform. With the heavier 220-230gr loads, you've got a bigger hammer that is a dead split between the 180gr .357's and the heavy Keith .44Spl load. Comparable weight for caliber at similar velocities. I'm not averse to recoil so I'd prefer something the size and weight of the GP for a .357 or 10mm. Again, it's not on my short list but I can see how this might appeal to some.

 

[The Evangelist Cowboy]

There are no .357's in that sort of optic-friendly platform. With the heavier 220-230gr loads, you've got a bigger hammer that is a dead split between the 180gr .357's and the heavy Keith .44Spl load. Comparable weight for caliber at similar velocities. I'm not averse to recoil so I'd prefer something the size and weight of the GP for a .357 or 10mm. Again, it's not on my short list but I can see how this might appeal to some.

Can't argue with that, the .357 was never given that sort of factory treatment for optics but if we wanted to go that route, Id go as you said, a nice warm 250 grain .44 spl load rather than 10mm, but for the non reloader, this may be the option they need.

 

[CraigC]

It would be nice if they offered a GP Hunter version that allowed the use of optics without ditching the rear sight. Then I'd have to do something else with this thing.

 

[The Evangelist Cowboy]

Better than my pea shooter, I take out hogs with a 4 inch security six

 

[Walkalong]

Redhawk and Super Redhawk are the exact same size and weight.

Unless I read it wrong, the SRH is 2 to 3 oz heavier. But definitely not a big difference. It's just too ugly for me. That said, if I wanted a scoped pistol, the SRH would be a great platform since I have failed to fall in love with SA revolvers. I tried, just couldn't do it.

 

[MaxP]

Got to be honest that I viewed this revolver initially with a bit of ambivalence, but when I took it to the range, I got it. I haven't hunted with it - yet, but it will make a great deer/hog gun. The SRH is just a great hunting platform, and this one is no exception.

 

[CraigC]

Unless I read it wrong, the SRH is 2 to 3 oz heavier. But definitely not a big difference. It's just too ugly for me. That said, if I wanted a scoped pistol, the SRH would be a great platform since I have failed to fall in love with SA revolvers. I tried, just couldn't do it.

Ruger lists a 7.5" Redhawk .44Mag as 1oz heavier than a 7.5" Super Redhawk .44Mag. The frames are the same size. The cylinders and cranes are even shared parts. The extended frame on the SRH is the only significant difference externally and makes the difference in the grip frame versus the grip stud a wash. Their beauty lies in their utility.

 

[The Evangelist Cowboy]

Ruger lists a 7.5" Redhawk .44Mag as 1oz heavier than a 7.5" Super Redhawk .44Mag. The frames are the same size. The cylinders and cranes are even shared parts. The extended frame on the SRH is the only significant difference externally and makes the difference in the grip frame versus the grip stud a wash. Their beauty lies in their utility.

So would I be fine buying a .45 colt redhawk and installing a .454 SRH cylinder in it with no problems?

 

[MaxP]

So would I be fine buying a .45 colt redhawk and installing a .454 SRH cylinder in it with no problems?

Yes, I had one of those:

 

[The Evangelist Cowboy]

Yes, I had one of those:

View attachment 782479

Is it able to handle full power .454 loads or do you have to download a bit?

 

[tommy.duncan]

"I bought one when they were first released. I have a scope on it now but not when I first shot it.
(I have the same Simmons scope in matte stainless)

It is a very good shooter. It is quite accurate. I am very pleased with this revolver.

I also hoped we would get a GP-100 in 10mm. I figured the SRH was a little large for the 10mm, but it is worth it."

This is what I posted on the other SRH 10mm thread.

I have since added a S&W 610 no dash. This pistol is also heavy and over built.

I haven't played with the SBH 10mm yet, but I would buy one if I saw one.

 

[Walkalong]

Their beauty lies in their utility.

I'll give you that, pretty is as pretty does.

 

[Ohen Cepel]

I like Ruger and I like 10mm but this makes little sense to me unless you're a hard core auto guy already into the 10mm and so don't want a .357, 41, nor .44.

Many new guys are auto people only so this may appeal to them, not so much for me but do hope Ruger sells a lot of them in any case.

 

[Saleen322]

Very pleased with our SRH 10mm. I have multiple 357s, 41s, and 44 mags and this SRH is still shot more than any of those. Accurate and hits more than hard enough for any hunting in my area. Good revolver but everyone has their own wants. YMMV

 

[Vern Humphrey]

I'd go with the same revolver in .45 Colt. You can load it to step on the heels of a .44 Mag if you wish -- or even approach .454 Casul velocities.

 

[7mmb]

In that bore size in a revolver 41 Magnum makes more sense. The SRH is available in 41 Magnum from Davidson's. If I wanted a 10mm in that price range I'd go with a Tanfoglio Elite-series pistol.

 

[CraigC]

I'd go with the same revolver in .45 Colt. You can load it to step on the heels of a .44 Mag if you wish -- or even approach .454 Casul velocities.

The same revolver isn't offered in .45Colt but .454Casull.

 

[PabloJ]

Whats your opinions on this?

Pointless to have revolver chambered for pistol cartridge. In this case you can buy .44Mag and use .44special and .44 ammo or larger gun needed,454 magnum and use .45Colt or .454 ammunition,....

 

[The Evangelist Cowboy]

Pointless to have revolver chambered for pistol cartridge. In this case you can buy .44Mag and use .44special and .44 ammo or larger gun needed,454 magnum and use .45Colt or .454 ammunition,....

For the non reloader who wants to handgun hunt with ease of optics this is a great platform, As much as I love the 44 and 45 calibers theyre are expensive for the non reloader, the option to use cheap .40 smith is also a plus especially when cheap .40 is running 12 bucks a box in my area where as .44 mag is at least 33 bucks a box.

 

[MaxP]

Pointless to have revolver chambered for pistol cartridge. In this case you can buy .44Mag and use .44special and .44 ammo or larger gun needed,454 magnum and use .45Colt or .454 ammunition,....

Variety is the spice of life.

 

[CraigC]

For the non reloader who wants to handgun hunt with ease of optics this is a great platform, As much as I love the 44 and 45 calibers theyre are expensive for the non reloader, the option to use cheap .40 smith is also a plus especially when cheap .40 is running 12 bucks a box in my area where as .44 mag is at least 33 bucks a box.

Good point and both cartridges are a lower recoil alternative, especially in this platform.

 

[200Apples]

Without go0glin' various commercially-loaded cartridges, what bullet weights and velocities are we talking about with a 10mm you fellrz would like to hunt with? I now handload, so I may have this covered with .44 Spl... and a few flat top New Model Rugers.

 

[mcb]

Without go0glin' various commercially-loaded cartridges, what bullet weights and velocities are we talking about with a 10mm you fellrz would like to hunt with? I now handload, so I may have this covered with .44 Spl... and a few flat top New Model Rugers.

I prefer 180-200 gr bullet going 1250-1300 fps. Mine are hand-loaded but there are commercial loads that achieve similar performance. I don't see 44 Special achieving 10mm performance unless you are pushing it well beyond SAAMI MAP for 44 Special.

 

[200Apples]

I don't see 44 Special achieving 10mm performance unless you are pushing it well beyond SAAMI MAP for 44 Special.

I don't know what MAP means (mean absolute pressure?), but SAAMI recommended limits for .44 Spl are 15,000 psi and for older firearms.

A 250 grain LSWC or 260-ish LWN can be launched at 1100 fps within pressures safe for a Ruger medium-frame Blackhawk. Brian Pearce has labeled these Category II loads to 22,000 psi but only in certain guns. And then there are the Category III loads, but by that time I'll use my Old Model Super Blackhawk and Magnum brass, loads and bullets.

Guess it comes down to whether one prefers heavy slugs at leisurely velocities rather than lighter slugs truckin' along at a higher rate of speed. Thanks for your reply.