grampster
Member
Here's a copy of the e-mail I sent the author:
Mr. Chapman,
Well written, factual and fair. Refreshing to read a factual story in the MSM. My own theory of why some folks don't want to discuss the 2A is that its brevity, clarity and its simple English don't leave much room for "interpretation" especially when writings by the framers always confirm the intent of the 2A. Of course my previous comment is tempered by the understanding that some folks don't want or can't stand brevity, clarity and simple English.
Mr. Chapman,
Well written, factual and fair. Refreshing to read a factual story in the MSM. My own theory of why some folks don't want to discuss the 2A is that its brevity, clarity and its simple English don't leave much room for "interpretation" especially when writings by the framers always confirm the intent of the 2A. Of course my previous comment is tempered by the understanding that some folks don't want or can't stand brevity, clarity and simple English.