The next President

Status
Not open for further replies.
Condi Rice credits the 2d amendment with saving her fathers life in the sixties. You don't get more "pro" than that!

A pairing of Condi Rice and Tomy Franks in any order would be too good to be true. Probably Tommy as Pres. and Condi as V.P. only to ease the old guys into the idea of a woman President. It would be a hard sell since they're both from the south and have never held an office.
 
I don't know, we have had president's who neverh eld public office. It isn't so common but it happen's.

Tommy Frank's might be good, I don't know about his views all to much though. Simply being a general doesn't qualify you in my book....case in point- Wesley Clark
 
Election? What Election?

(Hmmm, I can see I need to get rid of Smoke and Cannoneer...there's only room for one Imperator...) :)

Condi Rice looks like the only GOP who can stop Hill--but Condi's been embraced by "them." That gives one pause.

I've said many times here that there is no longer any way, in my view, that this nation can be united without the elimination of the very civil liberties we all prize here. I don't want harmony at that price. We need to shore up what matters, while we can.
 
It happen's with all vast land mass's.

For awhile it hold's together quite well but eventually cultural devid's happen and one group ends up opressing another and taking away their right's for the sake of unity. Few great land mass's last forever and I dont think our founding father's ever imagined a country as large as the modern day US.

And anyone wh osay's there is no major cultural difference in the US is a moron. Travel from the northeast into the south then to the midwest and from there to the west coast. There are major cultural difference's and all working in different direction's. Unfortunatly the liberal one is what seem's to be prevailing in washington.
 
Just for fun, lets agree with the Left wing lunatic barking moonbat liberals: George W. Bush stole the 2000 election. Therefore, his first real elected term began in 2004.

So, W. in 2008!
 
Like to see? Rice, Gingrich, Sowell. A proven conservative who has the guts to stare down the socialists, cut taxes, refuse deficit spending bills, restore the Bill Of Rights.

Expect to see? Hillary. By far, nobody wants it as badly as she and her supporters - it's the culmination of her life and movement (socialist feminism). The Right does not have their act together, and is not ready for the absolutely vicious fight about to begin.
 
Gingrich? :barf:

I'd like to see either Bill Richardson, or Barak Obama. Anybody now Obama's stance on gun rights? He comes from a pretty un-gun friendly state.
 
At this point. A dictator with common sense might be the only way to effectivly get the country back in order with all the idiot's.

I know the founding father's wanted the people to vote on thing's....but just like liberals say they never imagined the AK-47, they also never imagined such rabid stupidity.
 
Lupinus said:
Tommy Frank's might be good, I don't know about his views all to much though. Simply being a general doesn't qualify you in my book....case in point- Wesley Clark

Case in point - Dwight Eisenhower.
 
Meef-

Plenty of good general's made good president's. And Ike was good.

But Clark was a general and I wouldn't want him in the office. Military experience is a great thing for a president to have. But jsut because you are a general doesn't mean I am going to vote for you over the guy with no military experience.

It doesn't hurt, but it also doesn't automaticly make you the best man for the job.
 
Queen Hillary

And they ask me why I no longer own a papered firearm. Two word answer - Queen Hillary. And then comes the collapse and breakup of the United States as we know it.
 
Lupinus said:
Only if you want the liberals to change their mind's on cloning and research on fetal cells


Are you saying that the liberals block stem cell research or are you being sarcastic?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top