Tips on using the lever action rifle for self defense

Status
Not open for further replies.

Trebor

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2003
Messages
4,817
Here's my latest Michigan Firearms Examiner article on using the traditional lever-action rifle for self defense.

Tips on using the lever action rifle for self defense

Excerpt:

One area where the lever gun is often overlooked is as a personal defense rifle. While semi-auto rifles with high-capacity detachable magazines rule this market segment, and for good reason, the venerable lever-ation can still put up a fight if needed.
 
It seemed to work in the good old days, didn't it?? people kind of forget that in the old days, lever action and single action handguns were the main self defense in those days and it worked very well. I'm sure they would have liked 30 round mags and an AR but managed to get along without them...
 
Good little article. Lever actions are a good complement to revolvers, so a revolver owner would only need to stock one type of ammo if he wanted a longarm for defense. I think the typical lever action rifle has sufficient ammo capacity for an average civilian.

Topping off your ammo isn't that hard once you get good at it; it's the sort of thing you can practice at home using snap caps. I hadn't thought of applying the technique to lever actions before.

The article didn't mention Henry Arms, which is another good manufacturer.

I think a person would still have to pick their caliber carefully depending on their situation. I'd think a handgun caliber would be plenty for urban home defense, and the bigger calibers better suited for rural areas or hunting in brush.

Thanks for the link; my respect for lever actions has gone up a few notches. My opinions prior to this were shaped by a finicky, used .22 my dad used to have.
 
I'm sure they would have liked 30 round mags and an AR but managed to get along without them..
While I'm firmly in the "it's the shooter not the gun" camp and agree that a well run lever gun can serve just fine for defense, the main difference between now and the old days is that if you had a single action revolver and a lever gun back then, the other guy did too.
 
LeverActionpresellcover.jpg



http://www.onesourcetactical.com/leveractionriflegunfightingdvd.aspx
 
I would think training/practice + a lever action + micro Aimpoint would make a heck of a defensive combo. One in 44Spl or 357 would give good capacity, decent power (esp. with rifle velocities), and fast follow up shots.
 
My .357 carbine is stoked with leverevolution rounds and stands ready right next my 870. The short lever throw of that little Marlin makes it pretty fast. It is also something my wife handles easily. I think it fits well as part of an overall country boy HD plan.
 
It is far less the gun than the individual using it.

It has been my experience that the more skilled a person becomes the more ambivalent as to their preferences.

A duffer with any gun, bolt, pump, lever, simi-auto, fully auto is still a duffer and more likely than not have a bad time, on the range or on the street.

A skilled marksman, who is very familiar with their weapons, will instead hold their ground well.

Leverguns? Oh, if you have shot them often and can shoot fast and strait, they will do for all but a 21 ninja scenario. Same goes for a good revolver, even a SAA if you really know what you are about.

Deaf
 
I remember the days when I shot bowling pins off a table in pistol competition. It was fun. There were events where you did this with a lever action. A guy with a M1894 44 Magnum lever action has ten rounds in the tube and it is surprising how fast a good shot can clear a table of bowling pins.

M1894FullLength.jpg
 
lever guns just like pumps can be shot extremely fast with practice. They can kill just as well as any other rifle of the same caliber. However when you talk about defense I think most people will agree a rifle isn't the best option.
 
How is a rifle not the best option for defense? All else being equal, a man with a rifle has a tremendous tactical advantage over a man armed with a handgun or shotgun. The rifle outreaches the man with a handgun or shotgun, and the three points of contact are more stable than the handgun.

There are certain niches where another firearm may be better than a rifle, of course, but overall, I would rather have a rifle handy.

We have more lever rifles than any other type. There are Marlins and a Rossi in .357 Magnum, and BLRs on .308 Winchester. The ONLY reason I would reach for a shotgun first, is because I work for a PD that considers all of our armed defensive encounters to be in the line of duty, and we are required to use weapons with which we have fired a qual course. The only rifle with which I am allowed to qual, at this point, is an AR15, and I have about aged out of my ability to pass the rather athletic timed carbine qual course; my bad knee won't let me get up from prone quickly. The shotgun and handgun quals do not require going prone, and the shotgun qual is not timed.
 
Last edited:
When I read this and the link I was understanding personal defense as home defense as in close quarters situations. By all means in any situation where the target is lets say past 25' a rifle is far better suited. Sorry for not stating that earlier.
 
While I don't keep it loaded as a bedside arm, my little Rossi '92 in .44-40 would be an excellent choice for most situations out to 100 yards. If I can't solve a problem with 2200 grains of lead I'm probably not gonna solve it with anything else.

On an episode of "Best Defense" are year or so ago, Micheal Bane had a Marlin lever, decked out with Picatinny rails. Strange looking lever action I'll have to say.
 
When I read this and the link I was understanding personal defense as home defense as in close quarters situations. By all means in any situation where the target is lets say past 25' a rifle is far better suited. Sorry for not stating that earlier.

A rifle can be just as well suited for close quarters situations as it is for longer range work.
 
Regarding close quarters, I do find a legal-length pump shotgun unwieldy for searching the typical home, especially if I am the first one through a doorway, but a minimum-legal length rifle is notably handier. I work night shift big-city police patrol, and so I do have to clear buildings, no choice in the matter, but clearing a building is one thing, fighting is another. I don't want to go into what I know is a gunfight with a mere handgun, if at all possible! While clearing a building, as a team, not everyone is going to have a long gun, and one with a handgun can be the first through a door, or to go around a tight corner, while the shotgunner/rifleman covers him.

If I must defend my own home, without the benefit of co-workers similarly trained, I am going to stand and fight, not clear the house, and that means a long gun is the preferred instrument, with the handgun(s) playing a back-up role.

Some of us may have to go and round up children or elderly family members, and need a free hand for that. That may well be the time for a handgun, but I still want a rifle available.

True story: Exactly one year to the day after I had cleared a house, pursuant to a burglary in progress call, where a single mom lived with her two children, she called again, about another burglary in progress. While en route, the hair on the back of my neck was at full attention; this was creepy. I knew from her contact with the dispatcher, that the mom was with her kids in the bedroom at the top of the stairs, and that I could see the bedroom door from the window by the front door. Upon arrival, at which time I deployed my carbine, she had to descend the stairway, to the front door, to let me inside. I sent the mom to the street, as back-up was arriving at that time, and I immediately went up those stairs, in dynamic entry mode, to make sure the intruder did not have a chance to get to the kids. I shut and barricaded the door, and let other officers clear the house, while I stayed put in that bedroom with the kids. Anything other than a blue uniform coming through that door would have been a target, and I was able to tell my co-workers, via radio, where I was located with the kids. Yes, the break-in was real, but the perp(s) had evidently fled before we had the place surrounded.

I tell this story, not to make myself out to be a hero, but to show what one man with a rifle did in one particular circumstance. I went to the kids' location, secured the door, and made a stand, while letting a team of LE officers clear the house. I inserted myself into the role of defending the kids, as it seemed the logical thing to do at that moment in time. Why try to get the kids down those stairs, with an intruder possibly there to harm them? Better to run to the kids' location, and defend them from there, until the house was cleared by a team of LEOs.

Of course, each of us must make a plan based on our families, the layouts of our homes, our weapons, and our abilities.
 
Run what ya brung, if cornered I sure would.

I feel if we are using a lever for home defense the shorter action pistol carbine stroke is a better option than something like the 30-30. There is a huge difference between my Marlin .357 vs my Win 94. Inside the home with time to choose I would be going for the 870 .357 carbine and sidearms.
I really don't expect my home to be taking fire from any distance but under the heading of things-that-could-happen (and in the absence of a modern combat rifle) the 30-30 might gain me some cushion.
 
At indoor distances, I trust myself with my pistol. Of course, I trust myself with my little .357 Marlin, but it's not what I reach for when I hear a bump in the night. I feel better with the maneuverability of a pistol.

My $.02
 
It seemed to work in the good old days, didn't it?? people kind of forget that in the old days, lever action and single action handguns were the main self defense in those days and it worked very well.

They also were defending against people with similar weapons and to keep things in perspective riding horses and sending messages via telegraph worked very well for them too. :)

A lever action could certainly be used in a defensive role. I was going to suggest the Suarez video but I see it has already been mentioned. I own and enjoy lever guns but it is not my first choice for a defensive firearm. I likely would not go out and expressly buy one for that purpose. Of course if that is all one already has then it makes sense to become proficient with that platform.

If one considers the most probable HD scenarios where one would employ a long gun its not hard to imagine a proficient shooter being well served by a lever gun.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top