Wal-Mart in Southwestern VA Anti-Gun

Status
Not open for further replies.

big44

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2005
Messages
131
Location
Virginia
I teceived this today from VCDL. It looks like some Wal-Marts in Southwestern Virginia, particularly the one in Fairlawn, are becoming anti-gun. I am getting sick and tired of these places denying me the right to defend myself and my family. What good is it to have a permit isuued by the state if any Tom, Dick & Harry can void it?

The private property argument does'nt wash with me. Sorry, I know a lot of folks on this board disagree with me on this. If your business serves the public then you should have to honor legal concealed carry. If I'm going into someones home that's different. That's just how I feel.



New firearms policy at Wal-Mart lets district managers decide


Member A.L. Soots relays his experience at the Fairlawn Wal-Mart:

Mr. Van Cleave,

About a month ago, a relative of mine was in the Wal-Mart in
Fairlawn. He was doing some shopping while open carrying his weapon.
After being in the store for a little while, he was confronted by the
assistant store manager, Jim Hancock, who told him that he was
breaking the law by carrying his firearm, and asked him to remove it
in the store and let him take it. When my relative said no, the
manager told him that he could either go with him to the office and
"straighten this out" or be prosecuted.

He said, "OK," not knowing what he was going to be prosecuted for.

When they got to the back of the store, the assistant manager then
called the Pulaski Sheriff's Department and put the deputy on speaker
phone and asked what my relative could be charged with. When the
deputy told him that there was no law being broken, he then hung up
and started telling my relative that "things were going to change
when the next president was elected...and people like my relative
were going to lose their rights to carry weapons."

When my relative wanted to leave, he was told that he had to write a
report. After the report was written and signed, he then told him to
leave the property. There were witnesses to this. After I talked with
Dave Knight about this, he called and talked with the store manager
who told him that her store employees would "be educated" and that
they weren't to bother anyone carrying a weapon in the store.

Well, last night (August 28, 2007) I was in the same store to
purchase some ammo for a CCW class that I was teaching. I was in the
store with a friend of mine. We walked straight from the front door
to the sporting goods department (open carrying). After standing at
the counter with no help for a few minutes we were confronted by the
SAME assistant manager and another employee.

Mr. Hancock told us that we were not welcome in the store while
carrying a weapon and he wanted us OFF THE PROPERTY NOW. I asked him
if this was store policy or his policy. He said it didn't matter, and
that if we did not leave, we would be charged with trespassing.

We turned to walk out of the store and Mr. Hancock followed us on our
heels all the way out. I stopped at one point to ask him why he was
following us. After we left I made a call to the district supervisor,
Terry Sartain, and left a message at his office because it was after
hours. I spoke with Mr. Sartain this morning and he told me that the
local managers and he were working on a new firearms policy.

He said that they had cleared it with the home office and the legal
department and that they were OK to change the policy in his store to
NO FIREARMS...NO CONCEALED OR OPEN CARRY!! He said that the signs
were being printed and would be posted in a couple of days.

The stores affected by this change are Fairlawn, Christiansburg, and
Salem, with Roanoke stores to follow. So, it looks like Wal-Mart is
falling. What do we do about this, or is there anything that we can
do?

(Update: I just spoke with someone at corporate and was told by them
that the new Wal-Mart corporate policy on firearms is to let district
managers decide on the firearms policy for their stores. It is in
their hands and out of corporate.)

--

I will let everyone know when the signs get posted (if they get
posted). There are many different ways we may choose to respond, I
will let you know what we suggest in a future update.
 
...he then hung up and started telling my relative that "things were going to change when the next president was elected...and people like my relative were going to lose their rights to carry weapons."
This guy's attutide is why I have less and less faith that our nation is going to remain a peacefully united nation for another generation.
 
Jim Hancock, who told him that he was
breaking the law by carrying his firearm, and asked him to remove it
in the store and let him take it.

Wouldn't this be theft? And doesn't theft of a handgun carry a pretty hefty penalty?
 
If I am not mistaken the manager could have been arrested. Your relative wanted to leave and was detained until the manager could file a report. No law was broken so he should have been free to leave when he wanted. By not allow him to leave the manager (in my opinion) commited unlawful detention or false imprisonment. Wonder how he would like an arrest warrant issued on that count? Two can play the who gets arrested game. Wonder how the corporate office would feel about their manager in front of a judge, and being served other papers?
 
Wouldn't this be theft?
Hardly
When my relative said no, the
manager told him that he could either go with him to the office and
"straighten this out" or be prosecuted.

If I am not mistaken the manager could have been arrested. Your relative wanted to leave and was detained until the manager could file a report.
When my relative wanted to leave, he was told that he had to write a
report. After the report was written and signed,
No mention of the relative being forced to stay and sign the report against his will

Leave the credibility killing inventive stretches to the other side
 
The only real solution to this problem is to file a suit for damages against those managers who attempt to impose their personal biases on others.
Including the Walmart corporate structure in that suit as they have ceded authority to manages would be indicated.
The crux of the matter is not that people are carrying guns. That is smoke and mirrors. The real issue is whether or not a store or other public place such as Walmart, Costco etc. can dictate to honest law abiding citizens what they can and cannot carry on their person while shopping. This is no different from a policy that would ban cell phones, pocket knives, portable O2 cylinders, cigarettes, lighters etc. If they cannot legally force me to leave my phone in the car, or my aunt to leave her O2 in the car any other item they deem unsafe or unsavory than they cannot apply this policy to firearms which are legal to own, possess and carry in that jurisdiction. Unfortunately it will require a lawsuit costing the company money before they will bow down and respect rights.
 
Their store.. their rules.

There's a gas station by my house that insists that people not use cell phones while pumping gas. If they see someone on the phone, they yell over the loudspeaker telling the person to hang up.. if the person doesnt hang up, they'll shut off the pump.

Once again.. it's their station, their rules.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top