SpiderJohn
Member
Interesting thread, indeed.
My concern here is the overiding theme is negative. We can make changes to the system as long as the system still works. We just have to play the game.
Gun grabbers turn the message into something positive, by making the gun the "bad guy" and claiming it is for the children. People buy that, we know it is unadulterated crap, but people buy into the positve aspects of the message. How effective can we be when we cry that the "for the children" line is crap? We get put on the defensive and then have to fight our way out of a hole.
Look at the Democratic Party right now. In a state of dissarray, they stand in line to whine about this and that, who is in office, who is nominated and such. It doesn't appear that anyone is listening. Bush is still in office; Alito is about to become the next Supreme Court Justice. Nobody listens to a negative message.
The big networks moan about their ratings dwindling. Who is going to start watching them again because they whine? Not one single person.
Look at some of the most successful manipulators of societies. Most all had a message of hope. Would Churchill been so successful in ralleying a nation, and getting other nations to join the fight, had he been a whiner? Ever wonder why our very own nation dumped Carter for Regan (besides the fact the man is an idiot, and has zero understanding of foriegn policy)? We as a nation, threw out a man spewing messages about comprimise for peace, to replace him with a man who many were afraid would start the next world war. It was Regan's message, plain and simple. Carter was on his heels defending himself even before the conventions. I make it too simple, but think about it. Regan offered solutions on our terms; Carter was willing to give away the farm (or the canal) for peace.
If we as the "gun culture" are going to effect changes in the hearts and minds of others, we need a positive message to do it. Anything less is whining.
Finding ways to communicate a postive message, one person at a time, and in groups is the only way to win this. Look at Oleg's posters. The ones that have a positive message have more impact. The most influential poster Oleg has done in my opinion is an old one.
This poster says, "without a gun, I cannot defend myself"
Imagine this poster reversed. The yellow Star of David is on the left. It is now a postive message leaving the final impression one of strength.
Now this poster says, "With my Gun, I will take care of myself, and others".
Which message do you want to hear?
People look for leaders. Whiners don't lead.
I don't know much, but I know that I will listen to a man with vision, a lot longer than someone bemoaning the current state of affairs.
Edit: Some day I am going to learn to spell, it just ain't gonna be today.
My concern here is the overiding theme is negative. We can make changes to the system as long as the system still works. We just have to play the game.
Gun grabbers turn the message into something positive, by making the gun the "bad guy" and claiming it is for the children. People buy that, we know it is unadulterated crap, but people buy into the positve aspects of the message. How effective can we be when we cry that the "for the children" line is crap? We get put on the defensive and then have to fight our way out of a hole.
Look at the Democratic Party right now. In a state of dissarray, they stand in line to whine about this and that, who is in office, who is nominated and such. It doesn't appear that anyone is listening. Bush is still in office; Alito is about to become the next Supreme Court Justice. Nobody listens to a negative message.
The big networks moan about their ratings dwindling. Who is going to start watching them again because they whine? Not one single person.
Look at some of the most successful manipulators of societies. Most all had a message of hope. Would Churchill been so successful in ralleying a nation, and getting other nations to join the fight, had he been a whiner? Ever wonder why our very own nation dumped Carter for Regan (besides the fact the man is an idiot, and has zero understanding of foriegn policy)? We as a nation, threw out a man spewing messages about comprimise for peace, to replace him with a man who many were afraid would start the next world war. It was Regan's message, plain and simple. Carter was on his heels defending himself even before the conventions. I make it too simple, but think about it. Regan offered solutions on our terms; Carter was willing to give away the farm (or the canal) for peace.
If we as the "gun culture" are going to effect changes in the hearts and minds of others, we need a positive message to do it. Anything less is whining.
Finding ways to communicate a postive message, one person at a time, and in groups is the only way to win this. Look at Oleg's posters. The ones that have a positive message have more impact. The most influential poster Oleg has done in my opinion is an old one.
This poster says, "without a gun, I cannot defend myself"
Imagine this poster reversed. The yellow Star of David is on the left. It is now a postive message leaving the final impression one of strength.
Now this poster says, "With my Gun, I will take care of myself, and others".
Which message do you want to hear?
People look for leaders. Whiners don't lead.
I don't know much, but I know that I will listen to a man with vision, a lot longer than someone bemoaning the current state of affairs.
Edit: Some day I am going to learn to spell, it just ain't gonna be today.