Iraq has been proven to have had NO role in 9/11 [Unquote]
When was this "proven?" How exactly do you prove a negative anyway? Where are you getting this hot intel?
Are you referring to the doubts raised by the Czech Government about the Bin Laden operative meeting with an Iraqi Intelligence Officer in Prague?
The military action in Iraq has been mostly over for a very short time, for around a month. How long did it take to find Mengele and Barbie after WWII?
No WMD's? No Iraqi involvement in 9/11? So what. The Iraqi dictatorship killed hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians both directly and by starvation, waged unprovoked war on it's neighbors, threatened to supply weapons of mass destruction to terrorist groups, paid families of homicide bombers in Israel, attempted to assassinate the former POTUS (an act of war against the USA), violated the cease-fire agreement that ended DS/DS innumerable times (acts of war against the USA when they fired on US aircraft patrolling the no-fly zone), etc..., they deserved to be taken out irregardless of any lack of involvement in 9/11.
US forces in Iraq are now in an excellent postion to launch strikes into Syria and Iran, therefore the Iraq war was very well worth the trouble.
Aren't most of the people now saying we should have found WMD within one month the same people who said the weapons inspectors needed another six months to do their job properly, about a year altogether [Unquote]
Yep, these are also the same people who opposed Iraq I and II saying economic sanctions should have been given a chance to work, while simultaneously accusing the US of killing 650,000 Iraqi babies through the imposition of economic sanctions after Iraq I.
The fact that Hussein and his family refused to spend on food and medicine the billions from the oil for food program that were later found stashed in French banks means nothing to these people.
It's kind of sad to see the political left in the US devolve into such a shrill, ignorant, paranoid group.
Actually, I think the people here are making a somewhat unrelated argument:Aren't most of the people now saying we should have found WMD within one month the same people who said the weapons inspectors needed another six months to do their job properly, about a year altogether?
You askedIt got really quiet all of a sudden.
Then you posted an article fromDid Wolfowitz really say this?
And you weren't able to hear me LMMFAO?the Guardian/UK