It's simply shocking how much misinformation there is in this thread.
Choice nuggets include:
For the record, I personally like AKs a lot, but it's important to understand their benefits and limitations.
.
Choice nuggets include:
My converted 7.62x39mm Saiga will shoot 2-2.5 MOA all day on bulk ammo, which is combat accurate and as good as most any AR carbine with bulk ammo.AK is well made and reliable. Accurate is ain't.
See above.The SKS is well made, reliable, and more accurate than the AK.
Yes. Stamped versions do exist.Wrong. The sks doesn't have a stamped receiver, never has in any configuration.
There is no benefit to milled AK receivers over stamped, other than being pretty, and possibly a tiny reduction in recoil (though 7.62x39mm doesn't have a huge amount of recoil to begin with). Stamped is lighter, has no real impact on accuracy, and has been proven in Russian service to have a longer service life.was told to get milled over stamped
AKs require lubrication too. They are typically more subject to corrosion than ARs (steel versus aluminum alloy receivers, often wood versus polymer furniture, usually cruder -often paint- finishes on the metal parts).By truck gun I mean not kept in a warm safe cleaned and lubed as my ARs are
A used WASR with straight sights and a properly cut mag well is a dang fine rifle. This is pretty easy to inspect when buying used.Dont get a used wasr.
For the record, I personally like AKs a lot, but it's important to understand their benefits and limitations.
.
Last edited: