Much of it depends on the individual's idea of what constitutes a "trophy". They represent different things to different people. Is it solely for score or it is more personal? For me, it's strictly personal. Sure, it'd be great to be in the record books. I like to hang trophies on the wall but it's not what I'm about. What I consider to be a trophy might be just average for a score hunter. I hunt my own property and for me, the trophy represents the hunt itself and the victory I experience every day having finally reached the point in my life where I'm able to have enough land to hunt on. You can't quantify that with SCI score or point count. I also like hunting other places and when I do, trophy size is a consideration.
What I take issue with is the in-fighting. We all hunt for different reasons and with different goals. We should also respect the choices of others. As long as you're abiding the law and not wasting wildlife, I don't care why you hunt and neither should anybody else. If all you want is meat, there is plenty to go around. If all you care about is score or point count, may your name be added to the record books. What I abhor is hunters judging other hunters because they hunt for different reasons. Some look down their noses at trophy hunting, others deride high fence ranches and some pass judgement for the use of bait. I'm sure some trophy hunters look down on meat hunters but it usually seems to be the other way around. There's a lot of hunting I want to do before I'm too old to get around. Some of it will involve trophies. Some of it won't. Some of it will involve bringing meat home, others will involve donating it. I think we could use a lot less judgement because there are a lot of people who think we shouldn't be able to hunt at all.
There seems to be a misconception among hunters and non-hunters alike that "trophy hunting" involves wasting wildlife. I don't know of any jurisdiction where it's legal to waste wildlife, other than certain pests. I'm sure folks do and if they get caught, I hope they are prosecuted. Seems that a lot of folks assume that it's what happens in Africa, where it's actually less true than it is here. Nothing gets wasted in Africa, they eat and utilize more of their game animals than we do.
Speaking of high fence ranches, I know I've been judged for doing it. I'm 42yrs old and I've done it exactly three times in my life. Two of those times, it really was shooting fish in a barrel and I have little desire to repeat the experience. The third was NOT shooting fish in a barrel. It was fun, it was a learning experience and it was as close as you can get to chasing Cape buffalo through the bush for $2000 and a 14hr drive. Which is part of the appeal. Some folks will never get to go to Africa, New Zealand, Alaska, Canada, etc.. They'll never see a wild kudu or red stag in their native habitat. A high fence ranch is the only opportunity they'll ever have to hunt some species. Some folks simply don't have the time to spend two weeks in Africa but they can spend a couple days at a high fence ranch in the US. Some folks are unable to hunt as they did in their youth due to health issues. One of the fish-in-a-barrel ranches I visited, I wouldn't take anything for the experience because of a man named Dale who I got to meet. I never met a more passionate hunter but due to a stroke and other health problems, he was no longer able to hunt as he did in his younger days. If those places are not for you, don't go but afford others the same choice.