Disproving the myth of "Air Gap is dangerous" for Black Powder Cartridges

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 17, 2020
Messages
42
I was always taught that air gap in black powder cartridges was dangerous. The logic was from muzzleoading, where if you short-started but forgot to ram down a ball, you ended up with a bore obstruction some 2 feet away from the powder charge, leading to a risk of ringing the barrel.

While that may happen with black powder muzzleloaders, this phenomenon was never considered a risk by individuals loading black powder cartridges in the 1880's (prior to the invention of smokeless powder).

In the 1880's, US government issued black powder gallery cartridges using full-sized 45-70 cases, a 5 grains of black powder, a large air gap, and then a ~.455" (140 gr) round ball seated at the mouth of the case. NO FILLER WAS USED.

gallery.jpg

Yes, these were .455", which matches the weight of 140gr (though tolerance from .454" to .459" was allowed). See the picture of the winchester "45.5 Armory Practice Round Balls" as further evidence. And no, these were not "collar button" bullets, these were clearly round balls, as marked on the winchester box.

Captain Stanhope Blunt's 1889 Small Arms Firing Regulations further specifies that the powder charge can range from 4gr-7gr, depending on the powder type available (Fg, FFg, FFFg). These balls were coated with a wax lubricant.

roundball.png

And before you cry "well that's only 5 grs of powder, that's nothing", the Frankfort Arsenal made a heavier gallery load in 1902. They used a normal 45-70 case, a charge of 20 grains of black powder (probably FFg), a large air gap, and old leftover 230 gr 45 colt bullets seated at the mouth of the case. (remember, the military had swapped to the 38 long colt 1892 revolver at that point, and didn't officially swap back to 45 colt until 1909, so they had leftover 45 cal revolver bullets)

In essence, a light 45 colt load, loaded into a 45-70 case, and a large air gap in between.

Untitled.jpg

Other companies like UMC (prior to the merger with remington) also manufactured these gallery rounds from the 1880s to at least the 1900's. Note the crimp showing that the 140gr 45 cal round ball is seated far away from the 5 grs of powder.
armory-practice-round.png

Not only that, but these air-gapped black powder cartridges were expected to be used hundreds of times over. Regarding the roundball gallery load, Blunt's manual reads "The endurance of the service shells when used only for gallery practice is between 200 and 300 rounds; they should be occasionally washed in warm water, and if they become expanded so as to fit tightly the chamber of the gun they should be resized; this, however, will not often be required. The lead recovered from firing can be re-melted and cast three or four times.


Therefore, we know that leaving an air gap in a black powder rifle cartridge is dangerous is 100% myth. The US army and the Frankfort Arsenal regularly loaded 45-70 with large air gaps for practice rounds.

Filler is not necessary. Seating the bullet to the powder is not necessary. Sure, accuracy may (or may not) be as good as a properly loaded cartridge with compressed powder or fillers, but according to the US government, it is not dangerous to load black powder cartridges with an air gap! In fact, casings from these gallery loads was encouragted to be re-used hundreds of times!

Further, these gallery loads were encouraged over fully charged 45-70 for practice purposes. Many trapdoor service rifles that were stuck in barracks and not used in the Indian wars (e.g., on the east coast) would have seen more light-loaded 45-5-140 gallery loads than fully charged 45-70-405 loads in their lifetimes!

https://americansocietyofarmscollec...s/2019/06/2017-B116-Military-Marksmanship.pdf

The article above tells you more about how frequently gallery loads were used and encouraged for practice. Evidently the US government was a lot more frugal about their training budgets back in the day
 
Last edited:
I don't think a 5 grain charge is going to generate enough pressure to bulge a wet paper sack.
If you've ever dry-balled a flintlock, you would know that trickling 3-4gr of 4F through the touchhole is enough to knock a patched roundball from a 42" PA long rifle.
I have no doubts that 4-7 gr of 3Fg or 4Fg, plus the power of a large rifle primer, would get a lubricated, unpatched round ball out of a 32" barrel with a sealed breech.

The velocity would be low though. But remember, they were firing in gallery ranges 50ft long/16 yds long, not long range targets.
They were loaded to the equivalent of today's airsoft gun velocities (<500 fps). The goal was to have a load that was quiet to shoot indoors, and was safe to shoot at a steel target from 50 ft-100 ft (15-35 yds), where it would be gentle enough that the roundball would bounce back 5-10 feet from the target where it could be picked up and remelted to cast more round balls.

Now you're welcome to doubt all you want, but it's all there in an official US army ordnance department manual.

gallery-range.png
2022-08-22-09-26-19.png


And yes, these were Springfiled 45 Cal trapdoors, they had this system all figured out to even train use on long range firing with the ladder sights

2022-08-22-09-35-13.png
 
Last edited:
OK

Then why was the Frankford Arsenal filling up the extra space in 45 Colt cartridges with only 30 grains of powder with wadding?

Why did 45-70 carbine loads with only 55 grains of powder have wadding to take up the extra space?

I agree, 5 or so grains ain't gonna bulge anything.

But 30 grains in a 45 Colt or 55 grains in a 45-70 without anything taking up the extra space might have a different result.

And no, I am not going to load 55 grains in 45-70 and shoot them off in my Trapdoor, thank you very much.
 
Then why was the Frankford Arsenal filling up the extra space in 45 Colt cartridges with only 30 grains of powder with wadding?

Why did Frankford Arsenal load 45-70 cases with 20 grains of powder, 50 grains of air space, and a 230 gr bullet?

Shouldn't more air gap be more dangerous in this case, since the powder has a higher chance of flashing over and detonating?

2022-08-23-04-06-00.png

20 grains and a 230gr bullet is no slouch either, that's a heavier charge than how the 41 long colt (one of Elmer Keith's favorite "fight stopper" calibers, remember?) was loaded

2022-08-23-04-10-19.png
 

Attachments

  • 2022-08-23 04_06_00.png
    2022-08-23 04_06_00.png
    1.1 MB · Views: 2
Last edited:
I thought I did 100% fill my 30-30 rounds with black powder but on closer examination when loading the second batch I noticed there was room for a bit more powder. I don't have my wooden dowel rod for the first batch so I just eyeballed it.
With 190gr jacketed bullets they did about 1,250fps definitely would kill a deer if full power smokeless ammo wasn't available.
 
Would any material that is permeable, compressible, or flammable really have any impact on the ignition and explosive power of the powder? In my understanding of physics they would not.
 
Don't ask me how I know, but if you add filling to anything but a straight walled case, do not use cream of wheat or any other granular filler. Kapok works fine for bottleneck cases.

NRA Benefactor Golden Eagle
 
Would any material that is permeable, compressible, or flammable really have any impact on the ignition and explosive power of the powder? In my understanding of physics they would not.

I don't think you want to put anything flammable in a cartridge for a filler.
 
I never used Cream of Wheat, just Corn Meal. Anyways, if these loads work with cartridges, how revolvers with maybe 10grs and a RB flush with the top of a cylinder ? Just wondering.
Thank you SS for the interesting thread.
 
One of the muzzleloading magazines - Muzzleblasts I think - recently ran an article wherein the authors did quite a bit of experimentation with "short started" loads in an attempt to damage barrels. They were unable to do so even with fairly large loads, and opined that most of these stories were probably caused by a ball short started in a gun which was already loaded, and that is was the impact of one projectile into another that was causing the damage.

That's just one study, of course, and doesn't really transfer over to cartridge guns, but I do think it puts a serious dent into the idea.
 
One of the muzzleloading magazines - Muzzleblasts I think - recently ran an article wherein the authors did quite a bit of experimentation with "short started" loads in an attempt to damage barrels. They were unable to do so even with fairly large loads, and opined that most of these stories were probably caused by a ball short started in a gun which was already loaded, and that is was the impact of one projectile into another that was causing the damage.

That's just one study, of course, and doesn't really transfer over to cartridge guns, but I do think it puts a serious dent into the idea.
Could the ringed barrel be from an air gap between wad and bullet.
I have an old double 12 that is bulged too near the breech to be from a poorly seated double charge.
 
Could the ringed barrel be from an air gap between wad and bullet.
I have an old double 12 that is bulged too near the breech to be from a poorly seated double charge.

That is an interesting idea and could be a big part of it.
 
I don't understand this, "Don't ask me how I know, but if you add filling to anything but a straight walled case, do not use cream of wheat or any other granular filler. Kapok works fine for bottleneck cases."

You mean one should not use Cream of Wheat filler when loading black powder cartridges such as .32-20, 38-40 and .44-40? How about .32 Winchester Special? I was going to be loading some .32 Winchester Special soon and was going to do some of them with black powder.
 
I don't understand this, "Don't ask me how I know, but if you add filling to anything but a straight walled case, do not use cream of wheat or any other granular filler. Kapok works fine for bottleneck cases."

You mean one should not use Cream of Wheat filler when loading black powder cartridges such as .32-20, 38-40 and .44-40? How about .32 Winchester Special? I was going to be loading some .32 Winchester Special soon and was going to do some of them with black powder.

I'm not going to use a filler with any bp round. I'm going to stuff the case as full as I can and still cram a bullet down on top of it.
 
hawg, I can appreciate that. I do load my cartridges and cap n' ball revolvers to the full amount when loading black powder at least once just to try it. I also try to find the most accurate loads, which sometimes means wads and/or fillers.
 
hawg, I can appreciate that. I do load my cartridges and cap n' ball revolvers to the full amount when loading black powder at least once just to try it. I also try to find the most accurate loads, which sometimes means wads and/or fillers.

I can understand that but I'm not like most people. Punching holes in paper bores me to tears and if that was all I could do for recreational shooting I just wouldn't shoot. I also despise powder puff loads. I don't need every ounce of accuracy I can squeeze out of a bp firearm. As long as I can hit Coke cans more often than not at 25 yards one handed unsupported with a pistol. Or a milk jug filled with water at 100 yards freehand with a rifle I'm happy. I like the smoke and noise and the recoil whether it's a pistol or rifle.
 
Could the ringed barrel be from an air gap between wad and bullet.

That is the sense of the BPCR shooters posting on the Shiloh board. Worse with smokeless but not unknown with black.
Note that the gallery loads above do not have an over powder wad.

Smith & Wesson handled it the other way, their .32-44 and .38-44 gallery loads had the ball seated all the way down in the case over the light powder charge.
 
When you try to push a granular substance through a bottle neck case, the granules cannot slide past one another in the shoulder but transfer pressure to the case wall at the bottle neck and form a dam at that spot so that the pressure has no easy place to go. My rifle bolt has a flame cut ring around the firing pin hole when the primer came out. The case head expanded so that primers will rattle in the primer pocket. I have no idea what the pressure level was, but thankfully the action was well made. I switched from cream of wheat to kapok and all worked fine.

NRA Benefactor Golden Eagle
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top