remington 700 trigger issues?

Status
Not open for further replies.
ok. ill see if i can find a video in disassembly of the trigger and bolt. ive never cleaned mine. i just pull the bolt and wipe it down and clean the barrel. gotta get on top of that i guess. thanks man

Breaking down the bolt is pretty simple. You can collapse the spring against a wooden table top and lock it in place with a dime. Several companies make a simple tool to do this. The trigger has a lot of small parts and I would not recommend disassembly. But its pretty easy to wash out with brake cleaner or lighter fluid. (what Jewell recommends)

Of course, not directed to the OP or anyone in this thread or forum, if we always take care of our muzzle direction, even if there is a negligent discharge or a discharge due to defect it will not become a negligent homicide. Of which several of the Model 700 fatalities were the result of intentionally aiming a loaded rifle at a living soul.

^^^^^^^ THIS^^^^^^^ My AD was pretty much a non-event except that it surprised me. I was sitting in my stand with the muzzle pointed out of the window at the ground. Muzzle control!!!
 
Breaking down the bolt is pretty simple. You can collapse the spring against a wooden table top and lock it in place with a dime. Several companies make a simple tool to do this. The trigger has a lot of small parts and I would not recommend disassembly. But its pretty easy to wash out with brake cleaner or lighter fluid. (what Jewell recommends)



^^^^^^^ THIS^^^^^^^ My AD was pretty much a non-event except that it surprised me. I was sitting in my stand with the muzzle pointed out of the window at the ground. Muzzle control!!!


so does it need oiled or anything?
 
so does it need oiled or anything?

Jewell says there is enough left over stuff in lighter fluid that oil is not needed. I don't oil any of my triggers. I do spray the firing pin assembly with whatever gun oil that I'm using. Unless I'm hunting in the extreme cold, that is.
 
a friend was telling me the 700s have had issues with the triggers and it causes the guns to fire on their own. he said several people have been killed over the years because of it.

any truth to this? is it something that can be remedied?

I don't know whether anyone was killed, but it can be dangerous!!! I had my 700 BDL go off without my touching the trigger one day. It's really shocking when it happens, but fortunately, I never, evah! let the muzzle of a gun wave past any of my body parts. I was really shocked when it went off, but shock turned to disgust that the mechanism did that. I've had several Remington rifles and never had that happen with any other one. J. Picher
 
I was in "denial" for a long time, blaming the biased media for hyping a rumor to help kill the gun industry. But over time, trying to look at what evidence there is objectively, I came to believe there was (is?) a real problem with Model 700 (Models 721, 722 and 725 too?) rifles firing unintentionally at the time the bolt was being closed. If that was/is true and if Remington knew about it and failed to take redemptive actions and tried to hide the fatal flaw, their behavior is akin to Ford's egregious conduct in the infamous "Pinto Affair"-and they should be punished accordingly.
 
Last edited:
I'd recommend against oiling a trigger of any kind. It'll attract dirt and grime, one of the possible reasons cited for the Model 700 trigger failure. Give the exterior a wipe down with a lightly oiled cloth and then wipe it again with a dry cloth.


if they dont need it, they dont need it. thanks for the advice. seems pretty easy to pull the stock off and spray with cleaner. i will give it a shot
 
Below is my original thread from when this happened to me:
I don’t know why some think that just because they were aware of this years ago that everyone else in the world should be also. It's well documented that this was/is a real safety problem at the time the recall was issued, but it's not exactly broadcast on the news or in everyday reading today. Its very possible I may still not have known about it to this day if it hadn't happened to me and caused me to do some specific searching.
I would hate to know someone who was unaware had an accident because we thought this this was old news and not worthy of discussing occasionally. If it bores you to read about it again, no one is making you.


https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?threads/rem-700-slam-fire.898574/#post-12136431
 
WELL SAID!!!!

Below is my original thread from when this happened to me:
I don’t know why some think that just because they were aware of this years ago that everyone else in the world should be also. It's well documented that this was/is a real safety problem at the time the recall was issued, but it's not exactly broadcast on the news or in everyday reading today. Its very possible I may still not have known about it to this day if it hadn't happened to me and caused me to do some specific searching.
I would hate to know someone who was unaware had an accident because we thought this this was old news and not worthy of discussing occasionally. If it bores you to read about it again, no one is making you.


https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?threads/rem-700-slam-fire.898574/#post-12136431

I have owned only 2 Remington bolt action rifles in my lifetime and I must say that I never had any issues with the triggers. I suppose I was lucky. The first was a model 700 ADL which was very accurate. I just didn't care for the synthetic stock. The other one was the model 770 and I didn't have any issues with the trigger either and it too was very accurate. I did have a problem with the bolt coming completely out of the action when working the action after firing and Remington wouldn't honor the warranty because I was not the original owner. I have sold them both since then and told myself I would never buy another Remington rifle again. Once bitten twice shy.
 
I have had one accidental discharge due to trigger issues. I know that I absolutely did not touch the trigger. But I will accept the blame.

It's my opinion that if any firearm discharges without anyone "touching the trigger", the gunmaker is at fault, not the user. Your experience while hunting with your rifle in terms of inclement weather and lack of an immediate cleaning regiment is not that unusual. The gun should never have fired without someone pulling the trigger. If bad weather and a lack of prompt cleaning could cause a gun to fire when closing the bolt while not touching the trigger is the case, every shotgun I ever used in a duck blind following sleet, mud, gale force wind and the Lab shaking off water from its coat after a retrieve would make possible an "accidental discharge" every time I chambered a new shell without me ever having to touch the trigger. If you don't pull the trigger, the gun should never fire. Not ever.
 
Last edited:
Good explanations of how the Walker trigger fails, and how to identify them:


REMINGTON-WALKER TRIGGER EXPLANATION
http://flinthillsdiesel.com/Remington-Walker.pdf


Remington Rifle Trigger Timeline / History
https://riflebasix.com/blog/remington-rifle-trigger-timeline-history/

You can spend days searching this archive of Remington Documents.

REMINGTON RIFLE TRIGGER DEFECT DOCUMENTS
http://www.remingtondocuments.com/the-defective-trigger/

a good place to start on this website

Remington Testing Failures
http://www.remingtondocuments.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/remingtontestingfailures.pdf

I don't remember where I got this from. Might be useful to someone

Practical gunsmith's test of the Remington-Walker trigger---

Over the decades, standardized tests of Remington-Walker triggers have been developed to show a trigger that is prone to repeatable failures. These tests are simple, non destructive and can be very useful in identifying triggers that are demonstrably bad. It must be kept in mind that just because a trigger passes these test does NOT mean it's safe. As seen by the design, the defect is inherently present in the trigger. It just doesn't always fail. The shooter has no way of knowing when that failure might occur.

“Tricking” a trigger is done by carefully placing the safety lever in the 'null' position between fire and safe. Some guns won't perch there, some will. With the safety perched between detents, pull the trigger and release very slowly. Pay careful attention to a tiny 'click' as the trigger is pulled. If it's there, the gun will likely fire when the safe is pushed to OFF. Try that test several times and flip the safe off after each careful pull. Tricking is a way to determine if the lift of the safety cam is enough to clear the top of the connector in half-way position.

“Screw driver Test” is done with the gun cocked and ON safe. Push against the bottom of the connector, seen just in front of the bolt release leaf, with a screwdriver or punch and then push the safety to OFF. If the connector is sloppy on the trigger it will over ride the front of the sear so that the sear has no support when the safety is released. Guns that fail this test can sometimes fire on safety release after suffering common vibrations in a vehicle or on horseback.

“Sear lift test” assures the safety cam raises the sear high enough to not drag on the connector when on safe. Place the rifle safety ON and pull the trigger several times and release it slowly. If the connector drags on the bottom of the sear it can't get back under the sear to catch it as the safety is flipped OFF.
Guns that have been dropped while on safe can develop this failure by denting the safety cam.

Trigger adjustments--

Just be aware that the clear to cloudy-yellow sealer found on Remington-Walker screws is put there by assemblers as the trigger undergoes final adjustment at the factory. When that sealer is removed, the company has a certain amount of deniability and 'blame' is transferred to the one doing the adjusting. (I know, I know!!) I've adjusted Remington triggers for forty years because so many are useless without it. Just be aware of the liability involved and how it works so it's not made (much) worse by alterations of the surfaces or excessive adjustments.

Trigger repair---

The Remington-Walker can be made into a solid trigger system without using the connector by replacing the trigger and connector by an aftermarket or shop-made trigger, OR, the connector can be epoxied to the body of the trigger as long as one thing is done very carefully; The rear of the connector has to be ground square after the epoxy sets, BUT the actual disengaging corner of the connector has to be left in its' original position relative to the center line of the trigger pivot pin. It takes a precision grinder and fixture to do it right. Do it wrong and the trigger is even more unpredictable and could become very dangerous. Without grinding the rear of the connector square, the sear hitting the angle will soon break the epoxy bond and the trigger is worse than before.


HOW DO THEY FAIL?

Remington-Walker triggers are subject to several failures all due to displacements of the connector inside the trigger housing. These failures are common enough to have acronyms for them:

FSR-- Fire on Safety Release.

How many people have pulled the trigger with the safety ON just to 'test' it out? I know of hunter safety instructors that teach it as a good thing to do every time the safety is applied. How many times is the trigger pulled while the safety is ON but not by the shooter? That's probably a rarer occurrence but it does happen, that's why manual safeties and trigger guards are put on guns.
Should the trigger be pulled on a Remington-Walker, and the connector become displaced so that it does not return with the trigger, the shooter feels the trigger return not knowing the connector did not follow along with the trigger to its proper place under the sear. In that position, the safety lever is holding up the sear and the rifle fires when the safety is pushed to OFF.

Prior to 1982, Remington rifles had a 'bolt lock' incorporated with the safety lever. (#32 Fig. 1) That bolt lock means the gun has to be taken off safe in order to unload it.
FSR is one of the most common failures and the one that's caused the most damage, injury and deaths. In simple terms it's the improper displacement of the connector during the time the gun is ON safe. The 'trigger' is in the proper position, but the connector is not.

JO—Jar Off

When the gun fails due to impact it is said to have 'jarred off'. Precarious 'perching' of the sear on the very corner or edge of the connector causes a fragile connection that can fail with bumping or jarring. In all other over-ride triggers, this displacement is usually caused by improper adjustment of the sear engagement screw . A Remington-Walker can change that engagement dimension and drastically change the security of the system by simply capturing debris between two internal parts. It 'adjusts' itself to little engagement and just as quickly adjusts the other way as the debris is dislodged by the recoil of the shot.

FBO and FBC--
These refer to firing without a pull of the trigger when the bolt is opened or closed. This is a variation of a common 'Jar Off' caused by vibration of the bolt closing (easy to reproduce by mal-adjusting the sear engagement.) or the change in alignment of parts as the bolt handle is touched to open it. In both instances the most common cause is a connector being held out of position by debris, dirt, powder flakes, dried grease on any number of things that trickle through the mechanism as it's fired and stored. Fire on bolt close many times happens on the first loading after long storage. By design, the connector is pushed away from the trigger body when the rifle is in the fired position. That gives a chance for lint and debris to collect in sufficient quantity to alter the sear engagement the first few times the gun is then 'exercised'.

Can any of these failures occur in other triggers? Yes.

The operation of over-ride triggers, whether Jewel, Timney, Canjar, or Remington-Walker is the same. The trigger is a prop for the sear. If it doesn't properly support the sear under knocks and bumps a hunting rifle takes in doing its job, a discharge without a trigger pull can happen. The point is that the Remington-Walker has an extra 'trigger' that does NOT do the job it was patented to do and it's much more subject to become displaced than competing 'solid' triggers. Why is that connector in there?

Over-ride triggers, by design, are very fragile things and scary to think about when you also consider the risk involved. That they work well enough for a hunting rifle could have been disputed before the M-70 made it a fact in 1937. What had been known as a 'target' trigger became mainstream and a hunting trigger.

The M-70 has two parts pinned in a milled recess in the bottom of the receiver which keeps side to side motion to a minimum so the two parts are held closely in alignment with each other and the cocking piece. The M-70 trigger scrapes the sear surface clean into a trash trench cut in the trigger on each shot. There is no housing to catch debris. The sear comes up through a port in the rear tang which allows very little contamination of the trigger parts. The sear spring is nearly sealed and debris is blocked from entry into critical areas. 'Bad' M-70 triggers are the result of bad gunsmithing and usually found on match rifles. Otherwise they're very reliable and after a period of 'break-in' are usually very 'good' triggers.

Points to consider---

The Remington-Walker has an extra part that's free to move around inside the housing. That's the connector.

The connector is displaced from the front of the trigger on every shot due to the angularity of the back edge of the connector which is impacted by the corner of the sear as it falls. That is by design. Page 4, lines 46-50.

“...and, as the sear is cammed down, the radii existing on the points of the connector and the sear cause the connector to be cammed forwardly and completely clear of the sear step. ...”

In a mechanism subject to environmental conditions as well as lubricants and powder residue, two parts that separate several times during recoil are subject to a wide variety of contamination between them. As can be seen by study of the mechanism and it's patent, the Remington-Walker trigger is not self cleaning and it is housed within steel walls, but the unit is open at the top where the greater amount of such contamination is present.

The top of the Remington trigger housings are totally exposed in the rear tang of the rifle. At each operation of the sear, debris is 'pumped' into the housing. (Look at the top of the bolt release to see the stuff that comes all the way through the trigger.) Each operation of the bolt pushes more material into the vicinity of the sear opening. Remington-Walker triggers do get dirty and they can't be easily cleaned without dis assembly. Dis assembly of the trigger breaks the factory seals.

The connector is, in reality, a separate flexibly mounted trigger. It cannot be felt by the shooter. The position of the connector can be different than the position of the trigger without the shooter knowing it. The shooter can not know the position of the connector, it's out of his control and out of his view.


Just remember, everyone who called Remington and told them that their M720/M700 accidentally discharged was told they were the only person who had reported that problem, and whatever malfunction happened, was all due to user misconduct.
 
Last edited:
if they dont need it, they dont need it. thanks for the advice. seems pretty easy to pull the stock off and spray with cleaner. i will give it a shot
While you have the stock off and can see the trigger, get a magnifier or your phone camera and compare the sear engagement to the pic I posted in the " slamfire update" thread I linked earlier. You may not have any issues with your trigger, and spraying with cleaner won't hurt, but I would still plan on replacing it.
I was able to find a mil spec trigger at a reasonable price from a member here on THR that wasn't part of the recall. Trigger Tech replacement is probably the least expensive new option, and when I last checked they were about $160.
 
While you have the stock off and can see the trigger, get a magnifier or your phone camera and compare the sear engagement to the pic I posted in the " slamfire update" thread I linked earlier. You may not have any issues with your trigger, and spraying with cleaner won't hurt, but I would still plan on replacing it.
I was able to find a mil spec trigger at a reasonable price from a member here on THR that wasn't part of the recall. Trigger Tech replacement is probably the least expensive new option, and when I last checked they were about $160.


thats a good point. $160 isnt much in the grand scheme of things. some of their triggers are upwards of $300. imnguessing even then cheapest one is an upgrade and repairs the the issue as well
 
a friend was telling me the 700s have had issues with the triggers and it causes the guns to fire on their own. he said several people have been killed over the years because of it.

any truth to this? is it something that can be remedied?
I have a 700, one of several I've owned, but this is the only one that has done it. It only did it once and I was just sitting on a boulder when it happened. Just "shows to go ya" that anything mechanical can go wrong, at any time. Nothing but the bullet was harmed in this case, but it was not a "good" happening!
 
Of course, not directed to the OP or anyone in this thread or forum, if we always take care of our muzzle direction, even if there is a negligent discharge or a discharge due to defect it will not become a negligent homicide. Of which several of the Model 700 fatalities were the result of intentionally aiming a loaded rifle at a living soul.
This was always my thoughts as it can happen with any trigger or any rifle. I put Timneys in most of my 700s but my original first year 700 in .270 is still all original. I have adjusted the trigger and carried it for miles. The same with a my first year model 600 in .243. Keep them clean and know what you are doing when adjusting triggers is key to problems when it comes to ND. It does not matter what gun it is but I always pay attention to where the muzzle is pointed. If I am around others you can bet I'm paying close attention to where their muzzle is pointed.
 
I think the public revelations of the Remington M700 trigger problems would make an interesting psychology study. For those who were not on the web at the time, those who were presenting the design faults of the Remington M700 were always viciously attacked by deniers.

I am talking about deep, angry, vocal, vicious denial.

You can see how the author anticipates these attacks in this paragraph.

REMINGTON-WALKER TRIGGER EXPLANATION
©copyright 2010, H.J. Belk

Attacks on the author by those that have not read this paper while actually examining a Remington-Walker trigger and the patent language pertaining to it will be happily ignored. Facts are facts and I'm trying to explain how to actually see those facts so you can come to your own conclusions based on mechanical knowledge instead of what was heard or said somewhere

I have seen this on a number of safety topics, inevitably deniers come out and do their best to cancel whomever is waving a red flag.
 
My gunsmith will not touch a Remington trigger. If the trigger was fixed under the recall it will have the letter V stamped on the left side of the trigger.
 
I think the public revelations of the Remington M700 trigger problems would make an interesting psychology study. For those who were not on the web at the time, those who were presenting the design faults of the Remington M700 were always viciously attacked by deniers.

I am talking about deep, angry, vocal, vicious denial.

You can see how the author anticipates these attacks in this paragraph.

REMINGTON-WALKER TRIGGER EXPLANATION
©copyright 2010, H.J. Belk

Attacks on the author by those that have not read this paper while actually examining a Remington-Walker trigger and the patent language pertaining to it will be happily ignored. Facts are facts and I'm trying to explain how to actually see those facts so you can come to your own conclusions based on mechanical knowledge instead of what was heard or said somewhere

I have seen this on a number of safety topics, inevitably deniers come out and do their best to cancel whomever is waving a red flag.

I think we're witnessing a similar phenomenon with the Sig p320 and the "vicious denials" (including some moderators on this forum) regarding the growing amount of evidence that those guns will spontaneously discharge even while untouched in a holster.

Here's a link to the latest Sig p320 lawsuit, detailing at least 60 "uncommanded discharges." https://bit.ly/3ORBTS8
 
It's my opinion that if any firearm discharges without anyone "touching the trigger", the gunmaker is at fault, not the user. Your experience while hunting with your rifle in terms of inclement weather and lack of an immediate cleaning regiment is not that unusual. The gun should never have fired without someone pulling the trigger. If that was the case, every shotgun I ever used in a duck blind following sleet, mud gale force wind and the Lab shaking off water from its coat after a retrieve would have had an "accidental discharge" every time without me ever touching the trigger. If you don't pull the trigger, the gun should never fire. Never.

I agree. Shoot enough rounds in all conditions, and with people, you will see negligent discharges.And you will see and experience negligent discharges due to trigger mechanism failure.

The first crop I saw was in Highpower. At the time good two stage AR15 triggers were not on the market and competitors had their GI hammers and sears stoned for crisp, final releases. Unfortunately the metal on sears and triggers is actually quite soft, these surfaces would wear due to the spring tension and lever angles of a GI mechanisms, and then these AR15's would double during the rapid fire sequences. The Milazzo-Krieger was an early two stage design. Great trigger pull until the screw in the mechanism backed out and the rifle would double. And it would always happen in time, whatever locktite was used to hold the screw in place would eventually fail. Even the M1a had doubles due to trigger jobs which reduced sear surface engagement.

Bolt gunners also set their triggers to pulls less than a pound. Their risk was sear following. Ultra light over ride triggers are prone to following, that is an impact on the sear, by the cocking piece, would jar the mechanism so much that the sear would drop. This is a typical over ride trigger mechanism.

BksJHtk.jpg

M70 over ride trigger mechanism

5wPJHxf.jpg


It is nothing more than a trap door mechanism. Kick out the prop, the door drops. Here, the prop maybe has thousandths of an inch engagement. I believe a hard hit on the sear causes the trigger to move out of the way. Regardless of what is going on inside that mouse trap, I have seen cocking piece follow, and experienced it. Luckily the cam down on bolt guns is slight enough that I have not, nor seen, a round discharge when the firing pin/cocking piece on a rifle goes all the way forward. I am sure there is a dent on the primer though!

this is different.

a5YuaiL.jpg

this mechanism is the BSA version of a Martini action. The Brits created a heinously expensive, rigid, trigger housing. For the era, the trigger pull was light. I think it can be gotten to around a pound.

8zyvN8o.jpg


jhbRd19.jpg

having such a rigid platform allowed very precise alignments of springs, sears, hammers, etc. However, when this mechanism jars off, it goes bang! When ever I set up one of these BSA rifles for match competition, I monkey around with the two settings the designers created: trigger pull weight and sear engagement. I slam the mechanism closed to see if the thing will jar off. Then I go to the match, and find, it is jarring off at the range! So out come the allen wrenches and I increase the sear engagement just below the creep level, and if if still jars off, add some trigger weight. It is strictly a trial and error procedure, put a round in chamber, slam the breech block into battery, the round goes off, grass gets blown up in the air when the bullet impacts about 25 yards out! Monkey around with the adjustment screws, and repeat. Luckily the breech block is always in battery when the firing pin follows.

I learned long ago not to trust sear blocking safeties. The good military military safeties positively cam the firing pin back, and mechanically lock it back. Only breakage of the firing pin body will cause a discharge. I have had M1903 and M1917 firing pins break, so don't think it can't happen.

Had this happen on a pre 64 M70. The sear nose broke.

3JNbfiC.jpg

4CSzEo0.jpg


6nrnVHf.jpg

Don't remember if there was a round in the chamber when that happened or not. Due to the distance the firing pin can go forward, something like that could cause a primer to ignite.



Here is a good simple design. Pull back on the ring, turn it to the clockwise 90 degrees, drop it in the notch, and the rifle is on safe.

FkhjWnH.jpg

sOsvhzT.jpg

this is one of the best semi auto military trigger mechanisms ever designed, the Garand

NooR9Fb.jpg


same basic mechanism for the M14

CmLncSG.jpg

when the safety is on, that fin looking piece of metal, visible top picture, engages a cam surface on the hammer, pulls it back, and positively locks the hammer into position.

7hkadGg.jpg

nVPFLG6.jpg

Shoot enough rounds through a 1911 and you will have hammer following. That half cock mechanism works maybe 50% of the time to prevent a double. But the sucker will still double. I am on the third hammer and second sear on my Kimber Clackamus.

The thing is, Cult Cocked and Locked have created stories to justify their favorite mode of carry: Condition One, round in the chamber, hammer back, thumb safety on. One claim I read all the time is that the thumb safety positively blocks the hammer. This is wishful thinking: it does not. The thumb safety is a sear blocking safety.

GIVuKFu.jpg

Picture stolen from this post: 1911 & M1903 Colt Pistols - Safety and Design

If the sear breaks, if the sear surfaces are worn, if the sear jars off, the hammer will go forward regardless of whether the safety is on!

For those carrying cocked and locked, the only thing preventing a hole in your butt, is that small sear engagement between sear and hammer.

yqKnXc8.jpg

Half cocks get worn, and the spring tension on the sear may not force it into the half cock if the hammer follows

wQ2VDax.jpg

not much of a half cock on the series 80 Hammer.

fLvcW3x.jpg

Of course that firing pin safety on a series 80 never fails, does it?

4PQk2XD.jpg
 
Last edited:
Argue on
Because you know you are always right.

He assumed no liability and I am confident in the safety of the rifle.

You’re simply incorrect here.

He asserted by testing then making the claim that your trigger is safe, despite the warnings of the manufacturers, that he has sufficient qualification as your “gunsmith” to determine its safety. Your widow’s lawyer, in the event of a fatality due to this trigger, WILL have a case that your gunsmith, claiming this qualification, made the assertion the trigger is safe, which prompted you to assume its safety and make use of it.

The assumed liability in that case is no different than if he’d modified the trigger in some way and proclaimed the modification to be safe - he said it’s safe, so if he’s wrong, he’s liable.

You might be comforted by his claims of expertise in the area and his claim of proven safety, but you’re assuming the risk because you trust his word, and he’s assuming the liability of asserting safety of someone else’s product. Pretty simple.
 
If you google it, you'll discover that there were multiple lawsuits to include a class action against Remington alleging a faulty trigger / safety design that resulted in multiple deaths and serious injuries. I think there's even a CNBC episode detailing the history of problems with the Model 700. Remington and its defenders contended that the problems were caused by bad maintenance or careless gun handling. Ultimately, however, Remington did a recall to fix the trigger / safety mechanism but it was too little / too late and the company went bankrupt only to be resurrected by venture capital / non-gun people who had to declare bankruptcy again a short while later after sales totally collapsed amid complaints of completely shoddy products. The assets from the last bankruptcy were bought by a new company called RemArms that sells firearms under the Remington logo but refuses to honor the warranty claims for the guns produced just a few years ago under the same name. If you want a Remington 700, you should consider the Bergara line, which is a clone of the Remington 700 but without the same safety concerns and which also includes various improvements.
Or buy one of the many very fine used examples of the original 700 and simply put a Timney #510 in it.
 
He pronounced it good because the recall has been accomplished, or the rifles are not subject to the recall? If not then the trigger is not good.

Of course, not directed to the OP or anyone in this thread or forum, if we always take care of our muzzle direction, even if there is a negligent discharge or a discharge due to defect it will not become a negligent homicide. Of which several of the Model 700 fatalities were the result of intentionally aiming a loaded rifle at a living soul.

You cannot return the rifle to Remington because Remington is no more. The owner of the IP and rights to produce those products is not Remington and did not acquire any of the former Remington companies liabilities in the purchase from bankruptcy. The last produced Model 700 rifles and those now produced by RemArms are not subject to any current recalls or bulletins.

And if anyone is not aware, there was a recall for the Ruger tang safety bolt guns a long time ago for a trigger issue.

I RECEIVED A RECALL LETTER FROM REMINGTON. THE TRIGGER WAS PART OF THE RECALL.

After the bankruptcy, the NEW OWNERS do not honor the warranty or recall.

There are some Remington 700 with bad triggers. Not all are bad. Replacement is easy and fairly inexpensive. Regardless of manufacturer, model or trigger; muzzle discipline is safety rule #1.
 
You’re simply incorrect here.

He asserted by testing then making the claim that your trigger is safe, despite the warnings of the manufacturers, that he has sufficient qualification as your “gunsmith” to determine its safety. Your widow’s lawyer, in the event of a fatality due to this trigger, WILL have a case that your gunsmith, claiming this qualification, made the assertion the trigger is safe, which prompted you to assume its safety and make use of it.

The assumed liability in that case is no different than if he’d modified the trigger in some way and proclaimed the modification to be safe - he said it’s safe, so if he’s wrong, he’s liable.

You might be comforted by his claims of expertise in the area and his claim of proven safety, but you’re assuming the risk because you trust his word, and he’s assuming the liability of asserting safety of someone else’s product. Pretty simple.

My widow's lawyer is non-existent.
As a professional gunsmith, for 50 years, that trained under P. O. Ackley and worked for my family member, before buying his shop at retirement, who told "was the BEST he had ever met." I AM comforted by "claims of expertise" and I do accept the risk.
Thank you for your superior knowledge.
I am fine with my decision.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top