Cartridge vs. Caliber

Status
Not open for further replies.
I remember when my Dad explained caliber as a the length of the barrel, divided by the diameter of the bore.

ie, a 5”/ 50 caliber gun had a 5” diameter bore, and a 250” (20’ 10”) long barrel.

I still have his trench art ash trays made by cutting the base off of the bottom of the empty 5”/ 50 caliber brass.

5_inch_50_caliber_gun_USS_CHATTANOOGA_C-16.jpg
 
Last edited:
I remember when my Dad explained caliber as a the length of the barrel, divided by the diameter of the bore.

ie, a 5”/ 50 caliber gun had a 5” diameter bore, and a 250” (20’ 10”) long barrel.

I still have his trench art ash trays made by cutting the base off of the bottom of the empty 5”/ 50 caliber brass.

View attachment 1122780

Yes. The way we would read 5"/50 would be a "five-inch gun of fifty calibers."
I prefer a .357"/14 or a .357" revolver of 14 calibers. 3, 4, and 6" barrels aren't even multiples of the caliber.
 
I used to work with a guy that must have asked me at least a half dozen times, "Which is the most powerful, a 44 or a 45?" He never could understand how a "smaller" gun could be more powerful than a "bigger" gun.
That wasn't the worst of it though. I don't know if he ever got himself one or not, but he'd wanted a 1911 of some kind ever since he fired one while he was in the service, and he called all 1911s "45s"o_O.
 
I used to work with a guy that must have asked me at least a half dozen times, "Which is the most powerful, a 44 or a 45?" He never could understand how a "smaller" gun could be more powerful than a "bigger" gun.
That wasn't the worst of it though. I don't know if he ever got himself one or not, but he'd wanted a 1911 of some kind ever since he fired one while he was in the service, and he called all 1911s "45s"o_O.
A 10mm vs a 45 must have sent him into fits. :)
 
Last edited:
Is the cheat code to just identify the bore in decimal form like .310. It's my basic default and eliminates confusion.
 
Is the cheat code to just identify the bore in decimal form like .310. It's my basic default and eliminates confusion.
You mean like 9mm Luger and 9mm Makarov? Both diameter 9mm so they should all use the same … oops. ;)
I get the drift but then you have to consider some .32-20 are .312” while the some loading manuals list .308” for .32-20 and others list .310”. And then there’s the way some European calibers are described through time - the above 9mm are just one example. Or is it two examples? 7.62x54R and .303Brit… and 7.7Jap or is it 7.65Argentine? All use a bullet with nominal diameter of around, oh say, .311”-.313”. Unless they predate the switch to measuring grooves across the muzzle versus throat. :scrutiny:
 
You mean like 9mm Luger and 9mm Makarov? Both diameter 9mm so they should all use the same … oops. ;)
I get the drift but then you have to consider some .32-20 are .312” while the some loading manuals list .308” for .32-20 and others list .310”. And then there’s the way some European calibers are described through time - the above 9mm are just one example. Or is it two examples? 7.62x54R and .303Brit… and 7.7Jap or is it 7.65Argentine? All use a bullet with nominal diameter of around, oh say, .311”-.313”. Unless they predate the switch to measuring grooves across the muzzle versus throat. :scrutiny:
.310 is my cast 30-30 and .312 is my 7.7 jap. This is extremely important for the 8mm mousers that have a .317 and .321 I think??? I don't do 8mm but I know it's a big issue.
 
Last edited:
As I understand it….

.308 is a caliber.

30.06 Springfield, .308 Winchester, .300 Win Mag are cartridges of .308 caliber.

But I’m not a guy to tell someone who uses the term “clip” versus “magazine” they are wrong, since life it too short to worry such things.

I've not found another hobby that draws so many people that so eagerly await the opportunity jump on the chance to correct a person about minutiae as firearms.
 
.310 is my cast 30-30 and .312 is my 7.7 jap. This is extremely important for the 8mm mousers that have a .317 and .321 I think??? I don't do 8mm but I know it's a big issue.
Lol!!! Yeah, that’s a whole other level of weird right there. 8mm in the infantry rifle was originally was a nominal .318” but the later 7.92mm was a nominal .323”. Contract Mausers were also made with whatever barrel/bore the customer wanted. So you will find 9.3mm Mausers with .368” bore vs the more typical .366”. 8x50R and 8x52R are .321”/.320”, respectively but the later Austrian 8x56Rmm are .329”. It can get a little messy.
 
Correct terminology is a pet peeve of mine. I try to be a good example but I don't recall ever correcting someone else on it. Doesn't make my eye twitch near as bad as clip/magazine or .45 "Long" Colt. I'll only delve into it if someone else does the correcting and the offending party defends their inaccuracy.
 
Correct terminology is a pet peeve of mine. I try to be a good example but I don't recall ever correcting someone else on it. Doesn't make my eye twitch near as bad as clip/magazine or .45 "Long" Colt. I'll only delve into it if someone else does the correcting and the offending party defends their inaccuracy.
Didn’t John Taffin provide examples of .45Short Colts dating back to the 1890’s in one of his articles? I think it was in relation to the two different cylinder lengths of the US Army-issued .45US revolvers, one by Colts and the other by Smith &Wesson?
 
Didn’t John Taffin provide examples of .45Short Colts dating back to the 1890’s in one of his articles? I think it was in relation to the two different cylinder lengths of the US Army-issued .45US revolvers, one by Colts and the other by Smith &Wesson?
There was the hybrid .45Colt Gov't. The "Long" nickname didn't come into use until it was loaded commercially in the 1920's but we don't need to get into it here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top