Carl N. Brown
Member
I shot one belonging to a friend of my cousin. It is on my "to buy" list right after the Mare's Laig (in other words, a range toy curiosity piece).
How it shoots may be a very important concern. The handling characteristics play a role in a person's ability to place rounds sufficiently fast and accurately to incapacitate an attacker to where they no longer propose a threat.I still don't have much faith in 5.7 coming out of a pistol barrel. It's a caliber that is very dependent on hyper velocity.
I don't have to shoot one to form an opinion on everything except HOW it shoots. I really don't know how well it shoots. I just know that I don't like so much else about it. That's just me. If it works for someone else more power to them.
Wrong.Novelty, you can't buy the ammo that would possibly justify having one.
All of the papers you listed discuss ammunition that is either unavailable to civilians (SS190) or was discontinued completely about 20 years ago (SS90). Try to stay relevant.Several papers have described the incredibly poor terminal performance of the 5.7 x 28 mm projectiles fired by the FN P90:
--Dahlstrom D, Powley K, and Gordon C: “Wound Profile of the FN Cartridge (SS 190) Fired from the FN P90 Submachine Gun". Wound Ballistic Review. 4(3):21-26; Spring 2000.
--Fackler M: "Errors & Omissions", Wound Ballistic Review. 1(1):46; Winter 1991.
--Fackler M: "More on the Bizarre Fabrique National P-90", Wound Ballistic Review. 3(1):44-45; 1997.
--FBI Academy Firearms Training Unit. FBI Handgun Ammunition Tests 1989-1995. Quantico, U.S. Department of Justice--Federal Bureau of Investigation.
--Hayes C: “Personal Defense Weapons—Answer in Search of a Question”, Wound Ballistic Review. 5(1):30-36; Spring 2001.
--Roberts G: “Preliminary Evaluation of the Terminal Performance of the 5.7 x 28 mm 23 Grain FMJ Bullet Fired by the New FN P-90 , Using 10% Ordnance Gelatin as a Tissue Simulant”, AFTE Journal. 30(2):326-329, Spring 1998.
See above. You're recycling misinformation.lacks the ability to defeat soft armor (which is this platform's "claim to fame") because the ammunition required to do so is unavailable to the general public
See above. You're recycling misinformation.Exactly, the only advantage of the 5.7 over more conventional ammo is in the AP rounds. Since civilians can't buy those, the standard rounds just don't offer any benefit over cheaper, more widely available civilain ammo.
5.7x28mm is no more expensive to shoot than .45 ACP, and both rounds are poor performers without a hit to a vital area.expensive to shoot, poor wound ballistics.
Yes, there have been several shootings in the U.S. and there are dozens of shootings in Mexico with the Five-seveN every year. The shootings in Mexico are corroborated by news reports, photos, and videos of the crime scenes and victims (fatalities are the norm and it goes without saying that the results are very graphic, so I won't post them here).Other than the Fort Hood shootings, have there been any documented shooting demonstrating whether the pistol/round is or isn't effective?
Wrong. The 5.7x28mm was designed in response to NATO requests for a 9mm replacement; it would have already replaced the 9mm with NATO except the adoption process was blocked by Germany/HK and the 4.6x30mm.the 5.7 is a highly specialized round created specifically for LE/Military to defeat body armor.
Wrong again.for civilians, it's nothing more than an expensive plinker.
There are dozens upon dozens of such accounts. From police shootings, to Mexican drug cartel shootings, to the Fort Hood shooting, all indications are that the round performs every bit as well as any of the common pistol calibers.There are few actual accounts concerning the effectiveness of the round when used against people
Your comparison is disingenuous.A quick comparison...
FN Five-seven:
Height = 5.7"
Width = 1.4"
Length = 8.2"
Weight = 20.80 oz. empty
Glock 17:
Height = 5.43"
Width = 1.18"
Length = 7.32"
weight = 22.04 oz. empty
So, the FN is longer, wider, and taller than the G17, and nearly the same weight (only about 2 oz. difference).
And I can get 33-round magazines for the Glock.
A Five-seveN pistol loaded with 20 rounds weighs about the same as an empty Glock 17 pistol. The Five-seveN also has a higher flush-fit magazine capacity, shoots flatter, recoils less, and with EA's ammunition has the ability to penetrate any type of soft body armor.I guess I'm trying to say this:
The Five-seven doesn't do anything for me that a more affordable handgun does just as well or better.
EA's 5.7x28mm loads have been independently chronographed at over 2,500 ft/s out of the Five-seveN pistol. Hint: that is hyper velocity.I still don't have much faith in 5.7 coming out of a pistol barrel. It's a caliber that is very dependent on hyper velocity.
Novelty, you can't buy the ammo that would possibly justify having one.
My experience/opinion is that (both pistol and ammo) it is expensive, lacks the ability to defeat soft armor (which is this platform's "claim to fame") because the ammunition required to do so is unavailable to the general public and struggles due to its diminuitive diameter and mass to produce adequate terminal performance "on par" with the more commonly encountered semi-auto pistol "service calibers" (9mm, .357Sig, .40/10mm, .45ACP).
and struggles due to its diminuitive diameter and mass to produce adequate terminal performance "on par" with the more commonly encountered semi-auto pistol "service calibers" (9mm, .357Sig, .40/10mm, .45ACP).
No this isn’t a typo, but the S4 left the handgun each time close to 2600 fps. To put it into perspective, whatever handgun you now carry on duty, the S4 flies TWICE as fast and goes through Class III vests. It was the general opinion of three physicians-two military surgeons with oversea deployment and a trauma surgeon who operated on roughly a thousand gunshot wounds, that nobody could survive an S4 torso hit unless it took place right in the operating room- and even then it would be at best a toss up.
Summary
As tested, both 5.7x28mm cartridges offer lethality that is on par with or slightly greater than a .45ACP 230gr jacketed hollowpoint. This is accomplished through an intelligent usage of the pitch/yaw cycle inherent to any spin-stabilized projectile – the nose of the 5.7mm bullets travel through the first 2” of ballistic gelatin in a nose-forward orientation, which minimizes drag. For reference, the calibration BBs fired into these blocks are 0.177” commercial airgun BBs that penetrate the first 1.7” of gelatin, impacting at 575 ft/sec. As such, the very impressive amount of kinetic energy lost by most expanding bullets in the first few inches of penetration have little or no effect on the human target and actually decreases the effectiveness of expanding ammunition in incapacitating a target.
Conversely, the FN SS-195 and the Elite Ammunition S4M offer performance quite similar to the tested .45ACP, with considerably lower recoil and ammunition weight, coupled with a significantly higher weapon magazine capacity.
We feel that the Elite Ammunition S4M can be seen as a “+P” version of the very effective 27gr 5.7mm FMJ (SS195) and we have no qualms about recommending this cartridge as a feasible replacement to the more conventional .45ACP handgun, for use against human attackers
The P90 and PS90 are excellent CQB rifles. Way better than the MP5 and SBR semiauto MP5 clones. Running one in a carbine comp is like cheating.
5.7x28mm out of the 10-16" barrels seems to outperform the 9mm when fired from the tiny short barrel of the Mp5. My tests are fairly unscientific, but somewhat effective nonetheless. Phonebooks, dead pigs, waterjugs, Goa'uld Jaffa space aliens, etc. etc.
But the FiveSeven pistol, with it's short barrel is too borderline for me to trust. And I see no need for ammo commonality between rifle and pistol. A Glock has 27+ rounds with one reload, a rifle has 30-50 without reloading. If you go through all that, you have bigger problems.....
So I can wholeheartedly recommend the P90 or PS90 for CQB defensive use, but not the FiveSeven pistol. But it's still better than a .380.
So I can wholeheartedly recommend the P90 or PS90 for CQB defensive use, but not the FiveSeven pistol. But it's still better than a .380.
Every year, I and my best friend go to Montana to shoot prairie dogs and he has brought along on the last two trips, his FiveSeven pistol. Running it with the appropriate JHPs it does a good job of nailing the ones that are "up close" and it is a very well made pistol that is a lot of fun to shoot.
OTOH, my Glock 17 loaded with "el cheapo" Remington/UMC or WinchesterUSA 115 gr. JHPs does just as good a job at blowing the little vermin to bits as the FiveSeven and at a lot less expense.
The 5.7x28 may not be the upper power of the more common calibers, but even the lowly .22lr has done a lot of damage to folks in its history. The 5.7x28 is considerably more potent than that. Just slightly under the 9mm. Plenty of power, . . . especially when SHOT PLACEMENT is far more important than caliber size.
pointless, expensive to shoot, poor wound ballistics. pass.
Other than the Fort Hood shootings, have there been any documented shooting demonstrating whether the pistol/round is or isn't effective?
Statements like this, in themselves, mean nothing.
What is your personal hands on experience with the gun and ammo that leads you to that conculsion?
.
Never shot one. I did watch a guy at the range shooting one and he loved it. I prefer a bigger bullet.
the 5.7 is a highly specialized round created specifically for LE/Military to defeat body armor. for civilians, it's nothing more than an expensive plinker.
Then again, so are AR15's, M16's, etc., which shoot .223 caliber bullets. The FsN shoots .224. What is important is what happens when the bullet is on the inside of the target. That is were the "magic" happens.
maybe only people who have actually shot a 5-7 should be commenting in this thread!
I can allmost use 5-7 threads to build a list of posters to never take advice from.
I'm not going to call anybody names. And I hope the moderators don't lock this thread. I can take the punishment, it doesn't bother me.Yes, after years of the same naysayers jumping in with the SAME arguments... Guys who never even owned the gun, and are just regurgitating the same garbage, I almost never participate in these threads anymore...
Even if the question is about a specific aspect of the gun, and not the bullet itself... The anti five-seven round guys gotta come say it all again. Typically, these threads end up in name calling by the end, and are quite often locked... So why bother to get involved in them after seeing this go on for years now...
I bought a Kel-Tec PMR-30 instead.
Okay that's not true but it's funny. I agree with others, it is a high priced gun with high priced ammo that would be less effective in a SD situation than most common defensive calibers. The only advantage would be round count. That said if ammo prices came down to about the same as other common calibers I may buy one for a fun gun, would never use it for anything other than a pinker due to the anemic caliber.
I have been interested in them, since a friend sold me on the idea of owning one. He had one, along with his many hand guns, (rugers, glocks, sigs) and it's the one he most spoke about when we were listing "fun to shoot." The only thing holding me back (like so many others have mentioned) is price.
And isn't "fun to shoot" kinda the point?
Raise your hand if you are always shooting your handgun at someone.. ok, this thread isn't really for you.. as most of us do not. We (the rest of us) will be at the range with our firearms of choice shooting at paper and steel.
Some people forget that we aren't all 00 agents.
Any hand gun is better than fists. So get one you enjoy shooting. Then you are more likely to stay proficient.
Just saying.
7.62 Nagant killed many, too, with head shots at that. The Czar of Russia died in part from that round. Must be the best in the world given its record.
I've owned one but I got bored with it and sold it because it served no purpose in my collect that a .22LR pistol couldn't serve for a lot less money to own and shoot.
The FiveSeven is a neat gun and very accurate but I place it in the same category as the Desert Eagle, it's a novelty gun.
I will say however that I own a PS90 and I do miss having the FiveSeven as a companion gun to it. That said I own a PS90 because I am a huge Stargate SG1/Atlantis fan and if you are also as big a Stargate fan as me then I know you understand.
I've owned one but I got bored with it and sold it because it served no purpose in my collect that a .22LR pistol couldn't serve for a lot less money to own and shoot.