Redlg155
Member
It seems that for a while shooters, mainly the military, had gotten away from accurate sustained fire to volume fire using high capacity weapons. We went from the M14, even though mags were considered high capacity -the weight of rounds limited the amount of ammo carried, to the small calibrer M16. The 1911 went to the high capacity 9mm.
Just curious, would you go to battle with the M14 and have the limited number of rounds, or choose the M16? How about the 1911 and lower capacity or the M9 and higher capacity?
Are you confident with fewer,but more effective rounds? I seem to be stuck in-between the two. At my side is a Glock 34 with 17rds of 9mm JHP. My bedside rifle is a M1a Scout. Go figure.
Just curious, would you go to battle with the M14 and have the limited number of rounds, or choose the M16? How about the 1911 and lower capacity or the M9 and higher capacity?
Are you confident with fewer,but more effective rounds? I seem to be stuck in-between the two. At my side is a Glock 34 with 17rds of 9mm JHP. My bedside rifle is a M1a Scout. Go figure.