Funny how Glocks can fail, and the fanboys always blame everything but the gun.
Broken triggers, frames, faulty extractors, ejectors, recoil spring assemblies, and slide rails.
And the Glock's still "perfection".
Oh, I forgot, those are all "old issues".
Yet, when another brand of gun has had an issue in the past, that's proof that it's garbage and you should just buy a "perfect" Glock instead.
Fanboyism is bad. It leads people to believe Gaston Glock's BS marketing and BS "torture tests".
"We froze the Glock in a block of ice, thawed it out, and it worked." Gee, a gun that's not frozen solid actually works? Amazing.
"We dunked it in mud and then washed all the mud off, and it worked."
Gee, a gun that's not full of mud works? Brilliant.
"We ran over it with a gutted-out, stripped down van, with half the air let out of the tires and it didn't break."
Really? My boss in 1990, ran over his POS Davis .32 with a U-Haul JH. That's the 26 foot, IH diesel truck. Tire pressure was 110 psi cold. It didn't crack the "cheap, pot metal" frame, and the gun worked perfectly afterward. THAT'S a torture test, especially, since Davis' guns weren't known for reliability.
I don't hate or dislike Glocks. They don't fit my hands.
What I hate is Gaston Glock's BS. "It's not PLASTIC, it's POLYMER!!"
He has successfully preyed on the average person's ignorance of the subject of plastics.
It has a "safe action" trigger. It won't fire, unless you pull the trigger. Wow, really? All other guns must have thought triggers.