Interesting take here:
This, of course, doesn't mean the fight is over, or even that we are winning. At best here, we can only hope to hold our own, and then only if we keep up the fight. Sheriff Joe will probably call for an AWB, and Obama will probably put his name to it, but an AWB is unlikely. But there is still the possibility of them trying to do something, that would cause us to lose ground, by EO. They seem to think they can close the "gun show loophole" via EO, but I'm sure that will prove controversial if they try it, and probably be one for the courts.
I'm in AR, and am keeping up the pressure on Pryor. Any other Hogs on THR should be doing the same.A PALPABLE LACK OF ENTHUSIASM: Dem Senator Mark Begich: I’m “not interested” in a new assault-weapons ban. “Other red-state Democrats up for reelection: Mary Landrieu, Max Baucus, Tim Johnson, Kay Hagan, and Mark Pryor. Landrieu and Baucus voted no when the last AWB came up for renewal in 2004, and although Pryor voted yes, Arkansas wasn’t quite as red then as it is now. There’s no chance Reid will get to 60 in the Senate for a new ban; there’s a very slim chance that he won’t even get to 50. If you’re Pryor and you’re facing a tough campaign on unfavorable terrain, what’s your incentive for voting for a new AWB that hasn’t a prayer of passing?” Especially when it’s not going to get through the House.
This, of course, doesn't mean the fight is over, or even that we are winning. At best here, we can only hope to hold our own, and then only if we keep up the fight. Sheriff Joe will probably call for an AWB, and Obama will probably put his name to it, but an AWB is unlikely. But there is still the possibility of them trying to do something, that would cause us to lose ground, by EO. They seem to think they can close the "gun show loophole" via EO, but I'm sure that will prove controversial if they try it, and probably be one for the courts.