Hi fellow shooters!
While this concept has been around for a while (I think I remember reading about S&W doing something like this back in the 90's), I'm hearing more and more about it. If you're not familiar, the basic premise behind the 'smart' gun is that you need something else in close proximity to the gun for it to be able to fire. This could be a bracelet, watch, ring, etc.
Obviously there are a lot of concerns; your gun now has to have a battery although battery life has improved dramatically in low-power applications such as this. Also, its much more common to think to charge your cell-phone, so maybe 'charging' the battery in your gun while it resides in your safe, etc, wouldn't be so bad.
I still see a lot of negatives, such as 'what if the system doesn't unlock when I need it?' But for certain situations, maybe this system would offer some advantages? I'm thinking in particular of LEO's who are probably at the greatest risk for being shot with their own gun. Yes, there are retention holsters in wide use now, so maybe its a moot issue.
I personally would be against a 'smart' gun at this point in time. But I welcome other thoughts on the topic and would like to know what you all think?
While this concept has been around for a while (I think I remember reading about S&W doing something like this back in the 90's), I'm hearing more and more about it. If you're not familiar, the basic premise behind the 'smart' gun is that you need something else in close proximity to the gun for it to be able to fire. This could be a bracelet, watch, ring, etc.
Obviously there are a lot of concerns; your gun now has to have a battery although battery life has improved dramatically in low-power applications such as this. Also, its much more common to think to charge your cell-phone, so maybe 'charging' the battery in your gun while it resides in your safe, etc, wouldn't be so bad.
I still see a lot of negatives, such as 'what if the system doesn't unlock when I need it?' But for certain situations, maybe this system would offer some advantages? I'm thinking in particular of LEO's who are probably at the greatest risk for being shot with their own gun. Yes, there are retention holsters in wide use now, so maybe its a moot issue.
I personally would be against a 'smart' gun at this point in time. But I welcome other thoughts on the topic and would like to know what you all think?