ohbythebay
Member
So I know there are numerous I594 threads but this one is specific to the attorney Generals office. I called to get information and clarity specifically on my spouse using my firearms.
Before folks jump in and say spouses are allowed, understand that section 4 says they are exempt (along with other family members) while section 5 says they are not . I want clarity.
I was directed to Assistant AG July Simpson who has a recorded message on I594. (You can call yourself, ask for her and hear this message)
Basically the message states
The Role of the AG's office - Legal advice, Uphold the law, answer affected agency questions
At this time NO LAWSUITS have been filed (hmm,..why not) no request from other agencies, none from legislature, nada , zip...so basically it said they have no further information beyond what it says in the initiative.
If that is the case, how do they plan on upholding/interpreting/etc. the 18 page document
Time to ring that phone off the hookj
Adding a link to the same garbage...WHY NO LAWSUITS !
http://www.atg.wa.gov/page.aspx?id=32433#.VHzRZWB0w6s
Before folks jump in and say spouses are allowed, understand that section 4 says they are exempt (along with other family members) while section 5 says they are not . I want clarity.
I was directed to Assistant AG July Simpson who has a recorded message on I594. (You can call yourself, ask for her and hear this message)
Basically the message states
The Role of the AG's office - Legal advice, Uphold the law, answer affected agency questions
At this time NO LAWSUITS have been filed (hmm,..why not) no request from other agencies, none from legislature, nada , zip...so basically it said they have no further information beyond what it says in the initiative.
If that is the case, how do they plan on upholding/interpreting/etc. the 18 page document
Time to ring that phone off the hookj
Adding a link to the same garbage...WHY NO LAWSUITS !
http://www.atg.wa.gov/page.aspx?id=32433#.VHzRZWB0w6s
Last edited: