Hammer059
Member
First a little background so you can understand my situation: I'm by no means a Glock fanboy, I realize there are better handguns out there but I started and became proficient with the Glock platform. I sold my 26 because I have to pocket carry at my new job and I like pocket carry better anyway. So there was no need for me to have a subcompact 9mm Glock.
I want to get a full-size autoloader, I'm sticking with something in 9mm because I carry a LCR in 9mm and I'd rather stick with the same caliber. I certainly wouldn't mind going back to Glock and getting a 17, but I want to take my time and consider other options. So I've pretty much narrowed it down to a Glock 17 and Sig P226.
For me, the pros/cons of the P226 are as follows
Pros:
- Better ergonomics, although I have no complaints about Glock the Sig is slightly better
- Looks better
- Slightly heavier. The extra weight will be nice for recoil (although recoil is very tame in a Glock) and I shoot heavier handguns better as far as my accuracy goes.
- SA/DA. I'm fine with either striker or hammer fired. But if I had to choose, I do like having SA/DA
Cons/Concerns: (This list contains most of my questions for you fine people)
- RELIABILITY. Is this as reliable as a Glock under both good and bad conditions? I won't accept anything less than the reliability I've experienced with Glocks. I take good care of my firearms, but this is a huge deal breaker for me.
- Price. Is it worth the extra money? I can afford it, but I definitely won't pay more money for a firearm if it's less reliable or less durable.
- Are parts, especially magazines, easy to find?
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Please feel free to be as detailed as possible, regarding answers to my questions and also with your own experience with a P226 if you own one. It would be greatly appreciated.
I really would like the P226 to be my next gun, I just want to know if it's going to be as reliable and durable as a Glock 17. Thanks!
I want to get a full-size autoloader, I'm sticking with something in 9mm because I carry a LCR in 9mm and I'd rather stick with the same caliber. I certainly wouldn't mind going back to Glock and getting a 17, but I want to take my time and consider other options. So I've pretty much narrowed it down to a Glock 17 and Sig P226.
For me, the pros/cons of the P226 are as follows
Pros:
- Better ergonomics, although I have no complaints about Glock the Sig is slightly better
- Looks better
- Slightly heavier. The extra weight will be nice for recoil (although recoil is very tame in a Glock) and I shoot heavier handguns better as far as my accuracy goes.
- SA/DA. I'm fine with either striker or hammer fired. But if I had to choose, I do like having SA/DA
Cons/Concerns: (This list contains most of my questions for you fine people)
- RELIABILITY. Is this as reliable as a Glock under both good and bad conditions? I won't accept anything less than the reliability I've experienced with Glocks. I take good care of my firearms, but this is a huge deal breaker for me.
- Price. Is it worth the extra money? I can afford it, but I definitely won't pay more money for a firearm if it's less reliable or less durable.
- Are parts, especially magazines, easy to find?
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Please feel free to be as detailed as possible, regarding answers to my questions and also with your own experience with a P226 if you own one. It would be greatly appreciated.
I really would like the P226 to be my next gun, I just want to know if it's going to be as reliable and durable as a Glock 17. Thanks!