Took my .22s to the only open gunrange today.

Status
Not open for further replies.

NIGHTLORD40K

Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2015
Messages
12,941
Location
Nostramo (in absentia), Segmentum Ultima
Only one of the three local indoor ranges is open at the moment, and I was only scheduled for a half-day today, so I packed up my .22 pistols and trekked there after work.

Its a fairly small range attached to a fairly large shop. The backstop is only 15yds from the firing line and I ran my hangars all the way out.

My ammo selections werent fancy, some Remington Thunderbolts, CCI Standard Velocity, and a box of old Winchester Super X Ive been trying to get through for years as its been plagued by misfires and jamming problems due to their bullet profile.

My hopes were high for my new Dan Wesson .22, and it didnt dissappoint-
IMG_0009.jpg
This was my best group after warming up and adjusting the windage a few clicks. The DW seemed to like the Thunderbolts best.

This gun is silky-smooth and the long sight radius is nice, but Im not crazy about red sight inserts on blued guns. I like the white dot setup on the M17 better.

But.........I noticed an unusual amount of smoke and blast coming from the cylinder gap. Sure enough, it is WAAAAAAY too open. Someone probably reinstalled the barrel without the proper shim in place.
My feeler gauges are at work, so I couldnt couldnt measure it, but even visually I can tell the gap is easily twice that of my M17 or SP101.

Ive got a barrel wrench for my .357 DW, but not the .22 and they arent arent interchangeable. So the hunt is on for a .22 Dan Wesson barrel tool. Ugh.

Still, overall a heck of a smallbore wheelgun!

Next up was my Smith and Wesson M17, this would be the third range trip for it in a little over a year and the more I shoot it, the more I like it-
IMG_0012.jpg
:)

After shooting the huge (and heavy) Dan Wesson, the mid-sized-but-still-big-for-a-.22 Smith felt refreshingly light in both size and controls. Even the K-frame Target grips seemed svelte after a half hour with the big ol' DW.

The M17 is legendary for a reason. It makes even half-blind dullards like me seem like good shots with ease. It even threw all 3 brands of ammo well, though best results were from the CCI SV. Interestingly, the point of impact didnt change much between the standard and high-velocity fodder.

For giggles, I popped some pills in my tough, yet unrefined, vintage SP-101 and let loose-
IMG_0019.jpg
Despite its 4-inch barrel and adjustable sights, the SP isnt in the same accuracy league as the others. I tried all 3 different brands of ammo, but just couldnt get the little Ruger to group decently. Sigh.

Then the automatics had their turn-
IMG_0015.jpg
My M41 was showing its picky side today.....Ive done better than this with it before with Federal round-nosed HV, but Ive been told that they usually do best with standard velocity ammo. My example, however, plain refused to run on the CCI SV I brought, experiencing short-stroking and stovepipes. Im wondering if the old thing already has an extra-power recoil spring installed......

In any event, Im going to respring the whole gun and add a buffer anyway.

Despite a number of duds, the M41 actually grouped best with the cruddy Super-X today, go figure.

Next, I whipped out my plain, but trusty Ruger Standard-
IMG_0020.jpg
Not too bad for a fixed sight 4-incher, I think. It digested all 3 brands with no problems, even feeding the SV stuff without a hiccup. The old Rugers long, creepy trigger was on full display, however- compared to the precision switch on the M41 anyway.

Lastly, I played a little Rimfire Battleship with the M41 playing for the Allies and the Ruger Standard taking the Axis side. These were shot rapid-fire, which may account for the thorough drubbing the Smith gave the Ruger-
IMG_0016.jpg IMG_0017.jpg
Yep, aside from those two amidships hits on USS Washington there, the poor Ruger didnt come close. Meanwhile, the Kirishima and Graf Spee were pretty well swiss cheese. HMS Exeter survived without a scratch, lol.

Man, what a great time with my rimfires! Even the shop had a decent supply of guns and ammo on hand, though 9mm FMJ was still MIA. The poor employees looked like they had been keelhauled though!

Well, that was my afternoon, hope yours wasnt all doom and gloom. Stay safe!
 
Last edited:
I like shooting at ship photos like that...... Do not feel good about you shooting up US Capital ships :) .. but we must do what we must do..

also shooting up ship models, that is a blast..

Wait I forgot something..... Oh yeah nice pistols :)
 
Last edited:
Nothing is better than a relaxed afternoon at a range, shooting a variety of .22 pistols to see what they can do. Thanks for sharing your day with us :).

I have a .22 revolver currently sitting in the liberal penalty box until I can pick it up on April 8th... plus all the ranges are closed... so it’ll be a little while before I can have a day like that of my own... but when I do I’ll try to write it up as well as you did.

Nice shooting, super pictures and great guns! :thumbup:

Stay safe.
 
NIGHTLORD40K

Hey you sank my battleship! Well somebody had to say it! Great that you had a chance to get out and have some fun with your outstanding .22 collection! Where did you get the photos of those warships anyways? I would love to try something like that at the range!
 
NIGHTLORD40K

Hey you sank my battleship! Well somebody had to say it! Great that you had a chance to get out and have some fun with your outstanding .22 collection! Where did you get the photos of those warships anyways? I would love to try something like that at the range!
I just googled "warship profile" images. The tricky part was sizing them so they came out sorta the same scale.
 
I just googled "warship profile" images. The tricky part was sizing them so they came out sorta the same scale.


Do you think that is right??? I understand you wanting uniform targets.. But should you not want the ships to the same scale for the shoot..??

one thing that amazed me was how your shots did not look all that different from the real thing..

upload_2020-4-2_19-14-7.jpeg
upload_2020-4-2_19-14-28.jpeg

upload_2020-4-2_19-15-15.jpeg

WarDamageReportCL47-11.jpg
 
Last edited:
Do you think that is right??? I understand you wanting uniform targets.. But should you not want the ships to the same scale for the shoot..??

one thing that amazed me was how your shots did not look all that different from the real thing..

View attachment 905054
View attachment 905055

View attachment 905056

View attachment 905057
Ya, I noticed that too, lol.

I figured the important thing is to size the ships to each other on the same page so that each ship will appear the correct size to its opponents' gunners. In these two examples, the battleships and cruisers are all about 10 inches long. If I had a battleship and a cruiser on the same page, then I would try to size the cruiser smaller RELATIVE to the BB so that it would appear as such to the opposing ship at sea, thus presenting a smaller target.

15858731198635628762414732001060.jpg
So, Hood and Bismark would appear roughly the same facing each other in battle........ok, ok, I know Hood was a bit longer, but Im winging it here.
 
Another fun thing is to shoot down RC planes with shot guns...

At The Big Sandy they shoot the RC planes with machine guns... It is tougher than it sounds and very expensive.. Those little planes cost the shooters alot of money :) They are a pretty ingenious cheap design.

Skip to 2:00 if you want to see the plane part and skip the "stupid" close up cannon and gun shoots... :)



 
I enjoyed the video. All of it. I guess that makes me stupid but I don't really care.

One of my gun ranges is always open. It's thousands and thousands of acres of BLM land. :thumbup:
 
I'm not surprised the Ruger shot the worst. Terribad trigger and small sights will do that. Some people swear by them tho because they'll last for thousands, maybe millions of years, but there are cheaper .22 DA revolvers out there that equal or better than those SP101s.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top