Zerodefect
member
I hate that scam. And take being considered a mark personally now. Its insulting.
Usually I send those guys running.
Usually I send those guys running.
That represents a complete misunderstanding of the legal principle.I think "disparity of force "
Never.It would definitely be in play when suddenly facing multiple attacker.
That's ridiculous.And, spraying them with gasoline was definitely less lethal and risky to innocent bystanders than opening fire with your Glock would be.
Depends upon the circumstances.So might reaching for a gun
Verifiable?I've heard several stories....
That has been featured in central movies.and seen multiple YouTube videos of people using a gas pump for self defense.
Meaningless.Never heard of any one being charged.
One may not lawfully "spray bullets". One may, if it is immediately necessary, employ deadly force by using a firearm to prevent imminent death or serious injury. However, one may not do so without exercising reasonable care to avoid endangering innocent bystanders.It's a lot better idea than standing there and getting attacked or spraying bullets.
Yeah, well if I'm ever in that situation, the legal details will come second to defending myself and family. If I have time to produce my firearm, then I would. If not, he's getting hit with whatever's in my hand at the moment. If that happens to be a gas nozzle, that's what he'll get.That represents a complete misunderstanding of the legal principle.
Right on. And you certainly didn't offend me.The best deterrent is situational awareness and if anyone gets offended I don't care, but guys you have to learn to breathe without the use of a cell phone. That cell phone to the younger generation is akin to a baby sucking on a pacifier. That cell phone will be the cause of you getting attacked before you ever realize what happened.
Yep, within limits, and it could be your cell phone, but it should never be gasoline.If I have time to produce my firearm, then I would. If not, he's getting hit with whatever's in my hand at the moment.
I don't know you, but I seriously doubt that if you were in that situation and only had a fraction of a second to become aware and react that you wouldn't do whatever was needed....If I'm wrong, then please enlighten us on what you would do if you found yourself in that situation with no time to produce a weapon.
a NAA Black Widow.
But situations can be fluid. I keep the Black Widow in a front pocket holster. It is practically invisible to a casual (or not so casual) visual inspection, it is comfortable to carry, and easy and fast to draw, point, and cock. Since I learned to shoot instinctively a long time ago, it will be adequately accurate at the ranges I anticipate if it is necessary to fire.
No, I do not feel that I am under gunned. I am not out to start or fight a war. However, I think that is will certainly tip the balance in my favor.
Thoughts?
After some thought, I have decided that the most risky situation in which I find myself on a regular basis is the simple chore of getting gas. To the point, recently someone attempted to car jack a woman (mother with young child) at a gas pump at a local supermarket at 5:30 pm on a weekday. This location was in an upper middle class neighborhood and there were lots of people around--generally a safe bet for conflict avoidance. But, nevertheless, it happens.
In my situation, I am now in my seventh decade and recovering from a severely fractured femor. I am learning how to walk again. While it is getting better, I am using a cane.
In order to defend myself in this scenario, my approach is to be careful in my selection of places to stop (the best defense is conflict avoidance). But, as noted above, this does not always work.
My potential means of defense are my cane (a LEKI Wanderfreund) and a NAA Black Widow. The cane is important since it can be a formidable weapon as well as a means of distraction. Back when I was learning karate, I spent some time with my instructor learning to use a staff, cane, and shepards crook as a weapon. You really do not want to get punched in the wrong place with the tip of a cane.
But situations can be fluid. I keep the Black Widow in a front pocket holster. It is practically invisible to a casual (or not so casual) visual inspection, it is comfortable to carry, and easy and fast to draw, point, and cock. Since I learned to shoot instinctively a long time ago, it will be adequately accurate at the ranges I anticipate if it is necessary to fire.
No, I do not feel that I am under gunned. I am not out to start or fight a war. However, I think that is will certainly tip the balance in my favor.
Thoughts?
After some thought, I have decided that the most risky situation in which I find myself on a regular basis is the simple chore of getting gas. To the point, recently someone attempted to car jack a woman (mother with young child) at a gas pump at a local supermarket at 5:30 pm on a weekday. This location was in an upper middle class neighborhood and there were lots of people around--generally a safe bet for conflict avoidance. But, nevertheless, it happens.
In my situation, I am now in my seventh decade and recovering from a severely fractured femor. I am learning how to walk again. While it is getting better, I am using a cane.
In order to defend myself in this scenario, my approach is to be careful in my selection of places to stop (the best defense is conflict avoidance). But, as noted above, this does not always work.
My potential means of defense are my cane (a LEKI Wanderfreund) and a NAA Black Widow. The cane is important since it can be a formidable weapon as well as a means of distraction. Back when I was learning karate, I spent some time with my instructor learning to use a staff, cane, and shepards crook as a weapon. You really do not want to get punched in the wrong place with the tip of a cane.
But situations can be fluid. I keep the Black Widow in a front pocket holster. It is practically invisible to a casual (or not so casual) visual inspection, it is comfortable to carry, and easy and fast to draw, point, and cock. Since I learned to shoot instinctively a long time ago, it will be adequately accurate at the ranges I anticipate if it is necessary to fire.
No, I do not feel that I am under gunned. I am not out to start or fight a war. However, I think that is will certainly tip the balance in my favor.
Thoughts?
Spraying a volatile, flammable fluid on or around people or property cannot be done with reasonable care. The actor would be liable for any attendant damage and injury.
I recommend taking the Law of Self Defense course or MAG-20.
Are you kidding? C'mon, man."…That just might be one's last act on Earth, and if not, it is very doubtful that is would pass the reasonableness test…"
This motorist spraying carjackers with gasoline drives the point of situational awareness:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rcntnnw1TXI
Is it even legal to stand there, gun in hand, filling your gas tank, when no immediate threat is present?In cities, I've already seen this a few times:
I think that one could make a good argument that a diesel spill in such circumstances would not pose a hight risk of a fire. Not so with gasoline.John Corriea is a known, recognized SME, I don't have the slightest idea who you are. I know who I'm going to listen to.
I would not want to rely upon that argument.This innocent motorist fueling his vehicle did the absolute epitome of "reasonable" behavior using the pump.
That is utterly ridiculous.It would have been no different if he was attacked at a barbecue and clobbered the assailant with a glass bottle of ketchup or mayonnaise.
Premeditation has absolutely nothing to do with it.It was the tool he had IN HIS HAND with no premeditation.
I think that one could make a good argument that a diesel spill in such circumstances would not pose a hight risk of a fire. Not so with gasoline.