General newbie request for handgun experience, opinions

The CZ 75D is a great pistol, but it's basically the same size as a Glock 19 (apparently the OP was unaware of that when he wrote his list) and it's going to be pretty much impossible to find one in the $500-$600 range, at least as far as I can tell.
On OP's list the CZ was the only one that if be interested in.

Smaller is not better when it comes to shooting. Smaller guns have more recoil, shorter sight radius, stiffer recoil and magazine springs.

And remember capacity is awesome. Especially when someone is trying to kill you (defensive uses)

If it's for home defense (mentioned in OP) I recommend a double stack, high capacity 9mm

I'd narrow it down to g19 and CZ P01
 
On OP's list the CZ was the only one that if be interested in.

Smaller is not better when it comes to shooting. Smaller guns have more recoil, shorter sight radius, stiffer recoil and magazine springs.
Right. My point was that, even though the OP had the CZ 75 on his list, it doesn't meet his listed criteria. IMO, he needs to change his criteria.
 
image.jpg Make a list of wants, needs and desires. Your list of possibilities is not bad. I am going to throw an older model out there that is a perfect example of a compact nine (not sub compact). A pistol that has a 8+1 capacity, is 100% reliable and built like a tank. Accurate as any pistol I have, heavy enough that recoil is soft, slim enough with superior ergonomics that every one who has ever handled it loves the feel. A pistol that is also fun at the range.

All that said, it’s a bit big by todays standards for a single stack 9mm. It is still carry able if that is something you change your mind on. It’s no longer made but is still around. I absolutely love mine and think it would be perfect for a HD gun. Ready yet? It’s an Sig Sauer P239! Not cheap but worth what they are asking currently. It’s like an Sig Sauer P226 that spent a bit too long im the dryer.

That’s my vote!

I added the photo with its big brother the 226.
 
I'm not going to get into what brand or what action type of pistol you should buy. In all honesty I haven't read every post as I should. The ball game is distracting me. I just notice you have mentioned having small hands several times. I wanted to mention that there are several pistols available now that have interchangeable backstraps that allow you to tailor the grip to your hand size.
I have shot a S&W 380 EZ & it was easy to shoot well. Full sized or compact (Glock 19 sized guns) are usually a lot easier to shoot well than subcompacts & micros though.
 
Fewer things for a new shooter to screw up. I've seen many new shooters forget that they had a safety and have a mild panic moment when their gun didn't go bang when they expected it to. Also seen them forget to put the safety back on before holstering. Both of those things can range from mildly unsafe to fatal, depending on the specific circumstances.
Interesting points I had not considered, thanks. So guns generally with the safety switch don't have other safety measures?

The CZ 75D is a great pistol, but it's basically the same size as a Glock 19 (apparently the OP was unaware of that when he wrote his list)
You are correct sir, my bad on that. I'm afraid the CZ is out
 
Interesting points I had not considered, thanks. So guns generally with the safety switch don't have other safety measures?
Some do, some don't. With most modern pistols, forgetting to put the safety back on before holstering is less of an issue than forgetting to turn it off before pulling the trigger. If someone is willing to get good training and then practice enough to make the use of the safety a breathing level habit, a pistol with a safety can be a fine choice. Only a tiny minority of pistol owners are willing to do that, however.
 
When the adrenaline is pumping and you are in the fog of war a safety is an easy thing to fumble and wonder why the gun didn’t go bang.
The whole purpose of a defense firearm is to go bang each and every time you pull the trigger.
The whole purpose of a safety is to keep the firearm from going bang.
Do you see the dichotomy here?
Yes, but offhand I don't agree with it (reserving the right to change my mind!). Lord knows I am not a brilliant man but I think I can remember even in a criss that to shoot first I must flip a switch, which takes all of about a second.
 
Yes, but offhand I don't agree with it (reserving the right to change my mind!). Lord knows I am not a brilliant man but I think I can remember even in a criss that to shoot first I must flip a switch, which takes all of about a second.
Maybe you would, or maybe not. I've seen many who didn't remember, and that was during classes without the stress of someone trying to kill them. People don't get better at these sorts of things under stress, they get lots worse.
 
PS I do appreciate all of these replies! Definitely want to get out to a range and try whatever I can as many of you have mentioned. But till then getting whatever info/input I can helps. Still learning.

I get what some of you mentioned about a bigger gun being better in terms of recoil/etc. But as I mentioned earlier I do want something that is also a good concealed carry option, even though I don't plan on doing that much.
 
If it takes a second, you are backing up.
The safety can be disengaged as the gun comes on target with no time lost.
But it has to be hammered into your reflexes.
The reason that my competition guns have safeties, my defense weapons do not, it is not the same set of reflexes. When the USPSA buzzer sounds, I am on automatic pilot.
A gunfight is not choreographed and I will fall back on what the British source called "the convulsive response" where I find a DA/SA or DAO to work.

The nice thing about picking a gun is that you don't have to hire a lawyer to make a change.
 
Last edited:
Again I think I need experience here, esp with using guns with the switch vs the trigger safety.....
 
Safety switch: this is a matter of training. Every time I pick up my gun I practice disengaging the safety, it’s an automatic phrase I say to myself every single time: “Safety off.” IMO if one makes certain to train its not going to be an issue, but if you are the type to buy a gun and let it sit in your drawer untouched until an emergency, it may very well be possible to overlook the safety (or cocking, or some other part of the manual of arms) when you need that gun in a panic. In that case, a revolver or no-safety style semi auto will be beneficial: there’s only one control really, the trigger.

As a man with small hands I find that the Hi Power works great, as does the Sig P365xl. There are a lot of guns that work, actually… I can shoot a Taurus 92 fine, but it doesn’t feel great or give me a match-winning grip due to trigger reach. But it still works ok.
 
I have a lot of 9mm semiautomatic pistols, but still prefer revolvers for SD.

Likewise, I have various handguns that are a nice size for CC, but I don't carry them if they have a safety, or even a hammer spur.

If I'm getting mugged or assaulted, that thing has to come out of the holster right away, without snagging, and without me having to do anything except squeeze the trigger.
 
Again I think I need experience here, esp with using guns with the switch vs the trigger safety.....
Certainly. Something that all new gun owners should do is plan on spending at least as much on training, in the first year, as they did on the pistol. Ideally that training is done before purchasing the weapon. Be open to the possibility that your initial choice won't be your final one. Once you get some good training under your belt, you'll be able to come at the handgun selection process from a much more educated angle, one that is less confused by the widely varying advice you'll get from random, un-vetted folks on the internet.
 
Again I think I need experience here, esp with using guns with the switch vs the trigger safety.....
There are safety trigger like a Glock which uses a lever in the trigger then a trigger pull, multi-phase and the gun has no safety on the frame. The trigger is a safety of sorts. Then there are Double Action only pistols like the Sig I showed in my last post, Kahr does this as well. Several companies make similar products. The concept is a long double action pull, like a revolver is your safety. Then there are Double Action/Single Action guns. The first shot is long and purposeful acting as your safety the remaining are shot and light single action. They usually have a decocking lever that places the gun back to double action when required. This is found in guns like a Beretta 92, Sig 226 and many others. No manual safety to speak of. The only pistols that traditionally come with safeties are 1911 style single action pistols. Currently I see safeties popping up on all combinations of pistols. I am not against it, it’s personal but it is not something I would look for as it goes against everything I have become accustomed to. A new shooter just learning should not matter, that’s the time to train and learn the manual of arms and proper operation. My personal recommendation of safety is a concern is a DAO pistol. A deliberate pull of the trigger ever time leaves less to think about and is as safe as anything out there. I don’t have a problem with a Glock style safety trigger as a concept but it just never grew on me ergonomically. That’s why I like my Sigs and Kahr’s. As a long time revolver shooter a double action trigger is second nature and easy for me to learn and get the accuracy required. But like everyone is saying it’s up to what you like. No matter what you decide on, there are sooooo many good guns out there now that it will be hard to make a bad choice unless you go to cheap and cut corners. It will be a training and learning process. Good habits and training are the best safety measure that exists.
 
I have smallish hands for my size and find CZ pistols to be incredibly comfortable. The CZ75 d pcr is compact but shoots more like a full size compared to the m&p shield plus, which is the only other gun on your list that I have owned. They aren't that common on store shelves compared to the others. Browning Hi Power isn't on your list but they feel great to me too. There's no reason anyone should persuade you not to get a 9mm, especially in guns this size.
 
Revolver doesn't come with a 3 lb .020" trigger, either. No unless you shoot it SA, which I have seen done with unpleasant results.
You definitely do NOT want a light short trigger on your defensive carry gun. Too easy for an accidental discharge. Believe me, when the adrenaline is flowing you are not going to notice a six pound 1/4" trigger.
 
Gunny,

There is a lot of merit in going with what you know. My present issue gun is a GLOCK 19, but it would not be my first choice. If you want a compact grip, my favorite is the BERETTA 92X Compact model. It is similar in dimensions to the CZ-75D and it has a very smooth trigger. The CZ-75 is a good choice, but is not a compact pistol as far as I am concerned.
Any of the mentioned above pistols will serve you well for home defense.
However, the compact guns like the SIG 365 and SPRINGFIELD Hellcat will be harder for you to shoot, due to the greater recoil and smaller grips. My brother shot my SIG 365 and owns a GLOCK 43 and thinks they are just to unpleasant to shoot, but I feel the same way about his RUGER LC9 awful. So it will be up to you and your family as to what works best, not my or anyone else's opinion.

I strongly suggest you go to the range and try the pistols you are considering first. Many range rent guns or maybe you could get a friend to loan you one.

My wife can just shoot the BERETTA 92, but had trouble reaching the triigger, so for XMAS, she got a BERETTA 92X Compact which fits her much better than my BERETTA 92D Compact.
She also has a S&W .380 EZ pistol which is a terrific gun for people who are having trouble with working the slide on a pistol..

I also recommend against manual safeties. It is one more thing to go wrong. You may use the safety to drop the hammer on a pistol and then forget to take it off or it may be activated accidentally. I like the G models of the BERETTA pistols and the SIG decockers. They drop the hammer and then spring back to the firing position. This becomes a real issue with inexperienced shooters.

Oh, the 5.7 pistols have large magazine capacity, light recoil, but are really large guns. Also, I have not read of enough reports to believe the ammo as combat proven.
Still with the 9m.m. and get a premium round like SPEER Gold Dot or FEDERAL HST, they will not let you down.

Good luck,
Jim
 
Looking to buy a handgun for home defense. I've fired guns before (veteran here) so not totally clueless and have been doing research and watching some videos; also went to a gun shop to handle a few. Where I'm at:

- I want a smaller gun as I have smaller hands (so for ex. the Glock 19 and similar are out). Smaller and lighter is better.
- I'm pretty set on getting a 9mm, though for the right gun I'd be OK with a .380.
- I don't care if one gun is a bit more than the other, but not looking to go much over the $500-600 range.

Here's my short list right now:

CZ 75D
Glock 43X
Sig Sauer P365
S&W MP9 Shield
S&W MP Shield EZ
Springfield Hellcat

The Ruger 57 also intrigues me as a different kind of option. It's a little bigger and heavier than I'd care for, but the 20 rd mag and very low recoil are appealing.
I have a Shield Plus, the third generation, and really like it. Great trigger, shoots well, and holds up to 13 rounds.
 
Gunny,

There is a lot of merit in going with what you know. My present issue gun is a GLOCK 19, but it would not be my first choice. If you want a compact grip, my favorite is the BERETTA 92X Compact model. It is similar in dimensions to the CZ-75D and it has a very smooth trigger. The CZ-75 is a good choice, but is not a compact pistol as far as I am concerned.
Any of the mentioned above pistols will serve you well for home defense.
However, the compact guns like the SIG 365 and SPRINGFIELD Hellcat will be harder for you to shoot, due to the greater recoil and smaller grips. My brother shot my SIG 365 and owns a GLOCK 43 and thinks they are just to unpleasant to shoot, but I feel the same way about his RUGER LC9 awful. So it will be up to you and your family as to what works best, not my or anyone else's opinion.

I strongly suggest you go to the range and try the pistols you are considering first. Many range rent guns or maybe you could get a friend to loan you one.

My wife can just shoot the BERETTA 92, but had trouble reaching the triigger, so for XMAS, she got a BERETTA 92X Compact which fits her much better than my BERETTA 92D Compact.
She also has a S&W .380 EZ pistol which is a terrific gun for people who are having trouble with working the slide on a pistol..

I also recommend against manual safeties. It is one more thing to go wrong. You may use the safety to drop the hammer on a pistol and then forget to take it off or it may be activated accidentally. I like the G models of the BERETTA pistols and the SIG decockers. They drop the hammer and then spring back to the firing position. This becomes a real issue with inexperienced shooters.

Oh, the 5.7 pistols have large magazine capacity, light recoil, but are really large guns. Also, I have not read of enough reports to believe the ammo as combat proven.
Still with the 9m.m. and get a premium round like SPEER Gold Dot or FEDERAL HST, they will not let you down.

Good luck,
Jim
This is one reason Shields are great. They are not the smallest sub compacts, but they are just big enough they are easier to shoot.
 
Some do, some don't. With most modern pistols, forgetting to put the safety back on before holstering is less of an issue than forgetting to turn it off before pulling the trigger. If someone is willing to get good training and then practice enough to make the use of the safety a breathing level habit, a pistol with a safety can be a fine choice. Only a tiny minority of pistol owners are willing to do that, however.
Only a small minority of pistol owners train at all and don’t need extra safety features. The safety of a loaded striker fired gun, without a safety, and one in the chamber relies on training and practice many don’t ever get.
 
Last edited:
Only a small minority of pistol owners train at all and don’t need extra safety features. The safety of a loaded striker fired gun, without a safety, and one in the chamber relies on training and practice many don’t every get.
And habitually operating a manual safety relies on training and practice many don't ever get.
 
Back
Top