Why are HK’s so expensive?
DISCLAIMER: I am not about to bash, make fun of or degrade any other manufacturers.
Ok here we go. First, I’m going to shock a lot of folks by saying that they are not. I work in finance and if you do a little past/ present vale calculation, you will find that a USP costs, in relative terms, the same as a pre WWII 1911.
Next people say well, there are other guns with the same level of reliability as HK at two to three hundred bucks less, namely Glocks. To this I say yes that is true. HK and Glock both have an excellent reputation for reliability. But comparing these two guns on price is like comparing apples and cumquats. There are few, if any, pistols that do what a HK USP v1 does. Shall we review?
Polymer frame
Large cap mag
DA/SA
Cocked and locked
Decocker
More options = more engineering= more parts= more human (mostly skilled) labor= higher consumer price.
It’s just like the car with power everything and a convertable roof costs more than the stripped coupe.
But why am I personally willing to pay the premium for an HK and recommend them to friends and family, aside for reasons stated above, that is?
.0001. That is a small number, right? That is the rate of failure for my USP45. One failure in about 9000 rounds, and that was a ruptured case from a bad lot of Wolf ammo. So technically, my gun has never had a mechanical failure. If I used better ammo the number above would probably be 0.