Obviously Taurus isn't the best when it comes to service. But my guess is a lot of other gun makers aren't any better.
The only current gunmaker on par with Taurus for failing to deliver service in a timely manner (or at all) that I had problems with in my many years in the business was Kahr/AO. Kimber at one point would have been there, after absolutely failing to make a series of defective guns work without a year of back and forth - but eventually they got their act together.
Even Century was better and more responsive, even if they didn't always get things right the first time.
Companies I had zero problems with when getting service for customers off the top of my head: Sig, S&W, HK, Steyr, Weatherby, FN, Remington, Beretta (and its many various brands under its umbrella), Ruger, and Hi-Point. Yes, even Hi-Point gave better service than Taurus.
My gold stars for going above and beyond the call of duty (including sending out entire parts kits to fix problem guns, replacing pieces sight unseen and providing a pre-paid freight envelope/package to return the defective pieces) included Vector during their years of operation, Masterpiece Arms, Sig, and S&W.
I have no dog in this fight as far as their guns themselves - the one I did own for any length of time ran 100%, but I was aware of their spotty history and ordered it myself through Davidsons' so I wouldn't ever have to deal with their BS if it came down to it.
Given what most of their guns cost these days, they're not a tremendous value-priced brand any more. Expecting the level of service and quality I get out of similarly priced handguns isn't unreasonable.
Given what I know, I take that into consideration when deciding the value/purchase price of a gun. Taurus nets far more $$ if I can shoot/test it first, otherwise its value is fairly low.