SharpsDressedMan
member
I trained in the Army one the M16A1. Then they "improved" on it with the A2, but I never did like the weight of the A2.....it just wasn't as handy as the A1, and the little CAR was better. Then I leaned toward the .308 when seeing how much my 55gr bullets were blown off target at 200 on a slightly windy day. The .223 just kept getting less and less desireable as I quit shooting groundhogs. It just seemed bigger cartridges did everything better. I owned an M1A, HK-91, and even fooled with an FAL for awhile. Started liking a quasi-scout rifle (Remington 700/.30-06). It does everything, except fire lesser rounds real fast. When the current mood of society and economic changes caught my attention, I went to my gunsmith brother, and stocked up on some lesser expensive semi-auto carbines, in the form of a U. S. M1 carbine, Ak-74, and AK-47. I have a fair amount of ammo for each, and a fair amount extra for the AK-74 in case I am overwhelmed to go out and blast. They are not first rate battle rifles, but I have a CMP Garand for that. But the little guns can fend off about anything, and I can even arm my daughter and son-in-law if times get tough. For me, the AR-15 has been displaced. There are fine examples fo AR-15 out there, and to those that own and use them, I think you are well armed. For what I needed, and what I had to spend, I think I ended up with maximum return for the buck. How lucky any adversary will be coming up against me will depend on skill, and which gun I have in my hand at the time. Isn't that the way it is, ALL the time?