Interesting 930 SPX barrel observation....

Status
Not open for further replies.

highxj

Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2007
Messages
13
Hey guys, I recently bought a Mossberg 930 SPX from Bud's. After checking her out and cleaning it up, I ran out to the range and put about 100 rounds of mixed stuff, mostly low brass Rem and some W-W buck and slugs. Everything ran through it fine and even the mild birdshot loads ejected smartly. So far so good.

In attempting to zero the slugs at 50 yards, I was unable to bring the groups down to point of aim. With the rear sight all the way down and the front all the way up, as close as I could get was about 6" high, and it was punching nice tight groups for slugs. Three shot groups of no more than 2" center to center.

The zero problem was probably acceptable, but I wanted to see what Mossberg had to say about it so I called CS. They immediately offered to replace the barrel and wanted me to send the old one back first. I suggested that I would rather they sent me a replacement immediately and I could then compare the barrels before sending the old on back. They agreed, and after a couple of weeks I received the barrel.

As you can see in the pics, the front sight base is different. The old one appeared to have a spacer under the base, brazed on, while the new one is one piece. It also has much more elevation adjustment available. But the real surprise was the barrel weight. I noticed just eyeballing it that the new tube was much heavier than the old one. My calipers confirmed it, the new barrel has walls that are .026" thicker. The old barrel weighed 2 lb. 5.4 oz, and the new one is 2 lb. 10 oz.

One of the thing I liked about this shotgun was the light weight and nimble handling. Not sure how I feel about this new heavy tube, but I thought it might be of interest to other 930 SPX owners.....Now to shoot it and see if it shoots those W-W slugs as tightly as the old barrel.

New barrel on right:
Img_1145.jpg

Img_1150.jpg
 
sounds like you just got the Mossberg Treatment. You do realize very very very few companies, if ANY, would do what they did for you right? Hope you like the new heavy walled barrel of which I didn't even know EXISTED for a 930 and I hope you enjoy your next Mossberg purchase as much as I will. :D
 
It's good to see a company go that extra mile to back up their product but personally I wouldn't like that heavy barrel. I wonder what prompted that change?
 
Youngster said:
...I wonder what prompted that change?
If I was to venture a guess it would be...

The original 930SPX barrel was simply a "cut down" longer field barrel, so the barrel wall thickness was a product of the design of the field barrel. I have the 930SPX and, at one time wanted replacable chokes, when I asked my local guy to do it, he said the barrel wall thickness was close to the "minimums" for him to do it and I'd have to use thin wall chokes (too much money for what I was using the gun for).

The heavier wall barrel will allow for easier installation of choke tubes, and I would guess that they designed the barrel to be "tougher", it doesn't take a huge whack to make a ding in the bore with a thinner wall of the shotgun.

Also, Mossberg has a lot of Military and LE contracts, maybe the heavier walled barrel makes it easier to submit as a serious contender instead of a sporting gun with a "sawed-off" barrel...

Just my guesses........ but I like the heavier walls!!
 
interesting, we get the 930SPX's in(direct from Mossberg) every few weeks and everyone has had the thin barrel, I often wondered why they thin barrel, especialy when you have a 590A1 next to it to compare
 
I have an original 590 with a thin barrel and a 590A1 heavy barrel (in fact one of all three types). I got the short version as handier but the 590 is the longer version and there is something to be said for the weight and balance there too.
Al
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top