stonecutter2
Member
I've never been much into naming my cars or guns. It's just never occurred to me to do so.
I agree that naming inanimate objects, unless a name is required such as for a boat, is silly at best and sad. I wonder if people who name objects are just lacking in real human relationships and thus need to attempt a relationship with a non-judgmental, non-responsive, non-critical object that they can control. Just a thought.
I agree that naming inanimate objects, unless a name is required such as for a boat, is silly at best and sad. I wonder if people who name objects are just lacking in real human relationships and thus need to attempt a relationship with a non-judgmental, non-responsive, non-critical object that they can control. Just a thought.
Vito Wrote:
I agree that naming inanimate objects, unless a name is required such as for a boat, is silly at best and sad. I wonder if people who name objects are just lacking in real human relationships and thus need to attempt a relationship with a non-judgmental, non-responsive, non-critical object that they can control. Just a thought.
Seriously?
I'll tell you what I wonder...if people who wonder if people who name objects are just lacking in real human relationships and thus need to attempt a relationship with a non-judgmental, non-responsive, non-critical object that they can control are not, in fact, just lacking in real human relationships themselves, and thus need to attempt a relationship with a non-judgmental, non-responsive, non-critical object that they can control. Take that!
I used to name my firearms when I only owned a few. After some time it eventually occurred to me that trying to keep up with a couple hundred firearm's names was more trouble than it was to just identify them by some other means.
-Matt