LC9:XDs:Nano:Shield

Which one would you buy next?

  • Springfield Armory XDs

    Votes: 54 30.0%
  • Beretta Nano

    Votes: 14 7.8%
  • Ruger LC9

    Votes: 24 13.3%
  • S&W M&P9 Shield

    Votes: 88 48.9%

  • Total voters
    180
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
I voted the LC9 because I own one and I'm impressed with it. Its reliable, light and has a small footprint. My main carry is a Kimber CDP pro, so dollars wasn't a total issue to me, but here's something else to consider. The LC9 is by far the best value, the Shield, XDS I assume will both go for well north of $550, the Nano is but ugly and around $450. The LC9 can be had for $350-399 all over the country, if you can find one.

A few quick notes, the Shield and XDs are still physically larger guns, the XDs is almost as big as my Kimber 4"

Um, wrong on a few points. First, Buds has the XDs listed @ $500 for the black on black version. Of course they're not out yet, so we'll see what happens there. Second, people are buying Shields all day long @ right around $400. And that's 2 weeks after it was released.

I agree with you that the Shield is far too big, mostly in height and grip fatness.

However, the XDs is hardly a "physically larger gun" than the LC9.

LC9
Height: 4.5"
Length: 6.0"
Width: .9"

XDs
Height: 4.4"
Length: 6.3"
Width: .90" (an extra tenth ONLY at the slide stop)

They look functionally the same size to me, with the XDs even being a little bit SHORTER, one of the key metrics for pocket carry.
 
Based only off the fact that the my M&P pro feels better in my hands do I say Shield.

I have to get BOTH in hand before I can truly take a side. I will say that if it's a tie then I'd go XDS because a small 45 that feels good in hand is what I've been looking for all along.
 
The LC9 also has one of the worst triggers ever.
You obviously have never pulled the trigger on either an S & W Sigma or a Ruger LCP.

As the owner of an SW9V (Sigma), Ruger LC9, Ruger LCP, & S&W Shield, I'd have to say I think the LC9 probably has the best trigger of the bunch.

As Massad Ayoob has said, a light trigger pull is, more than anything else, a crutch for bad trigger technique.

Just a little food for thought for those that tend to deal in superlatives? :D
 
Just picked up a Shield today, havent had a chance to shoot it yet but I like the way it feels in the hand



Len
 
Took my new lc9 to the range today, after a good cleaning. Exellent 2 boxes of Federal and winchester fmj target ammo. I wanted to sight in the lasermax laser that came with it. Worked out well. As my back up gun I can fire 25- 50 feet and hit the head on a profile target 99 out of 100 times. I got 1 flyer.Trigger you say, reliable is my answer, having carried a revolver for 20 years the trigger is no worse than the average double action snubby. "out of the box" there are endless mods coming out for these guns, if you want to make a target gun out of it.
For me I was happy having a reliable accurate gun that I could still stash in my front pocket with a sticky holster sized "md-2". I hides as well in my clothing as it's replacement the lcp. I also like being able not to worry about having it against some of my vital areas and not being concerned that it was too sensitive and might catch on a zipper or hit a set of keys.
It's not my primary, but could fill that void if it had to. Point and shoot. I have tried every gun named this week, and they were all too darn big. FL weather makes it hard to hide 1 gun let alone 2. I don't fall in love with anything anymore, if a better mousetrap comes out, I will trade this one and buy that one. I couldn't see the nano or the shield in 9mm, both those guns are made for 40 caliber, and since my primary is either 45 or 40, I don't need another heavy "over 20 oz, unloaded" pistol. I almost bought the shield, but pulled out my Glock 26, or 27, and realized it wasn't doing anything different. if It was a 40 then I might use it as a primary, but then I still need a lighter pocket gun in 9mm, as 380 is just too small. I read a lot the last 2 months and the 380 while being a perfect size to weight ratio, just lacked the stoppping power or the amount of rounds to feel comfortable any longer. I go with a glock 30 or an EMP in 40, with 2 mags, as my primary. OWB holster, and the LC9 in my sticky holster. I can arm my spouse and feel comfortable if need be.And it still has 8 rounds of 9mm JHP corbon in it. The trigger in the others was a little better in the shield but not so much in the nano. Not important enough in a back up gun, it's not for shooting targets. If you practice with it you can shoot it pretty darn fast. The laser really helps, "my 2nd one" the first one was an armalaser and was more trouble than it was worth.
PS: google Sticky holsters , if you haven't tried them, I stumbled onto them a few months ago and they are just the greatest inexpensive holster since I can remember, the material is such that it stays wher you put it, no clips hooks or any fastening device, I use them ao all my guns, ask for mike and he will hook you up. I have absolutelly nothing to do with them other than being a good customer. My LGS carries only their holster now.
 
Last edited:
I'm a die-hard M&P fan so my vote goes to the Shield.

Although I've only shot the LC9 out of the list, i'm not thourougly convinced I'd buy one even if I had money to spare. Its a so-so pocket pistol IMO.

I'm interested in checking out the XDs and the Shield at the next trip to the lgs. The Nano, I could care less for
 
I voted for the XDs since I already have the Nano. I'd like a small .45 to go with my small 9mm.
 
I voted shield only because I figured the XDs would still have the grip safety.
 
I would buy the Shield as I already have the

Nano and XD9sc. That said, I recently passed on the opportunity to buy a Shield as it is similar in size to my PPS so I saw no real need.
 
BTW, I'm sure someone will chime in with the dimensions and declare the smallest the winner but I hate to tell you but a ruler doesn't tell you much

Yeah, a scale will tell a lot more about how a gun will pocket carry -- its the fully loaded weight that matters most IMHO.

I don't think any of these can beat the Kahr PM40 (or PM9) for power/weight ratio.

I voted XDs on the assumption a .40S&W model would be out eventually, I'm another that doesn't like .45ACP when the barrel gets much below 4" -- 180gr .40S&W has the same sectional density as 230gr .45ACP and .40 will give about 100 fps more velocity in the same barrel length help to insure adequate penetration. I'm firmly in the school that bullet placement and penetration count a whole lot more than bullet diameter or bullet design.
 
After holding them I do really like the shield better. nothing wrong with the lc9's either. I think the big turn off I see for the nano is if they would of given a better choice of mags with the gun it would sell better as it just does not fit even my small hands well.
 
I picked up a Shield about 2 weeks ago. Great sized pistol, and grips extremely well with the extended mag in. A little light on firepower, but a pocket full of mags takes care of that problem.

WT
 
I think Kahr has little to worry about. Their PM9/CM9 is a very high quality, reliable, and accurate firearm. The trigger is equal to a S&W revolver with a fantastic trigger job. Very long and smooth. If you like DA revolver shooting you will think you have gone to heaven shooting a Kahr. The Shield, XDs, and Glock will always take the market that likes the typical striker fired systems. Kahr, even though it is striker fired, has a trigger that is totally different from that other group of firearms.
My 2¢
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top