Has this Enfield (Webley) been converted to .45 ACP?

Status
Not open for further replies.

ApacheCoTodd

member
Joined
Jun 30, 2011
Messages
8,609
Location
Arizona
First off. Fear not, From what I've been able to find so far - this conversion (if it is in fact converted) is ill advised at best so I don't intend to shoot it.

I thought this was a nice example of the Mark VI pistol and really had no intention of getting into Enfield pistols but the price was right.

Upon opening it I see that the rear of the cylinder is unusually bright but thought little of it until looking into the background of these pistols and found several postings warning of the .45 ACP conversions - some with horrendous photos.

Gets me to thinkin'. I have a couple of 1917s sitting about with full and half moon clips incase of marauding hordes of, well... whatevers and thought to try slipping one into the Enfield while sorta hoping it wouldn't fit.

Damn, perfect fit for my full moons. Is this a reliable indicator that it has been "converted"? I had half hoped a standard chamber wouldn't allow an ACP in.

Additionally, an un-clipped .45 ACP round falls about 1/16 inch too far into the cylinder.
 

Attachments

  • DSC02255.jpg
    DSC02255.jpg
    64.8 KB · Views: 90
  • DSC02256.jpg
    DSC02256.jpg
    67.9 KB · Views: 95
  • DSC02257.jpg
    DSC02257.jpg
    109.3 KB · Views: 108
  • DSC02261.jpg
    DSC02261.jpg
    66.2 KB · Views: 65
Hmm the serial number off the cylinder looks like it had a few mm shaved off also?
 
Last edited:
Doesn't look as though it has. The ejector star center should be hexagonal.

Does the moon clip turn on its own?
 
Yes, it has been converted.

If it hadn't been, .45 ACP in clips would stick out too far to allow the gun to close.

rc
 
Yep, definitely converted. Otherwise as mentioned, the serial number would be on the back of the cylinder and you couldn't close it with moon clipped 45 ACP. The rim on the original Webley round is very thin.

Do you reload? You could always load 45 Auto Rim down to 455 pressure.
 
Thanks fellas.

Yup - reloading is definitely an option. I guess I'll get to marking some cases to indicate down-loads.

On the plus side - it keeps me out of a whole new caliber but rather, in a different load of an existing one. I wonder if I'll ever even bother.
 
I would not fire full power .45 ACP in that gun; better to download .45 ACP or .45 Auto Rim to below .45 Colt (standard) loads.

Jim
 
Huh. I vaguely remember that when I was very young, my oldest brother had a Webley revolver that he shot .45acp's in with moon clips. I had no idea that was a conversion, I always thought the pistol would handle the .45acp just fine, and only needed the moon clips because they had no rims. I wonder if my brother knew it was a conversion back then and the .45acp was too hot for it? I doubt he did.
 
Converted Webleys can stretch or crack the top strap, break the stirrup and have been known to blow the cylinder apart.
 

Attachments

  • .45 acp webley latch.jpg
    .45 acp webley latch.jpg
    67.9 KB · Views: 27
  • .45 acp webley latch2 .jpg
    .45 acp webley latch2 .jpg
    77.6 KB · Views: 35
Thanks again fellas. It'll get down-loads when shot.

What are the thoughts on lead outa these? Seems kind of natural based upon vintage ammo I've seen.

56hawk I like the autorim suggestion to keep me from possibly mixing ACP stuff down the road. Can a fella slip those autorims into a moon clip as well?
 

Attachments

  • DSC02254.jpg
    DSC02254.jpg
    59.4 KB · Views: 14
  • DSC02263.jpg
    DSC02263.jpg
    114.3 KB · Views: 16
  • DSC02266.jpg
    DSC02266.jpg
    107.2 KB · Views: 17
  • DSC02268.jpg
    DSC02268.jpg
    105.7 KB · Views: 20
I have a converted Webley. I fire very mild reloads (45 AR specs) and lead bullets. That's what the Webley fired in .455 (lead Round Nose) and does just fine with it. Even converted it's a great revolver. I looked for many years before I found mine. I'm keeping it.
 
These were available for next to nothing (about 35 bucks, as I recall, when I was in the army back in the 60s.
I was always tempted, but never bought one. Likely a good thing, as there were no warnings of any kind, and I'd have had no compunction about using regular .45ACP in one.

I did have several of the S&W M1917 revolvers; they were widely available back then too, usually for around 50 bucks.
I used to load .45 Auto Rim brass for those.
 
The Auto Rim brass has a thicker rim on it so that you don't have to use moon clips. It also makes it so that you can't use it with moon clips.
 
Hornady now makes an original 265 gn hollow base bullet for these. Bought some from Graph and Sons, but have not tried them yet.
 
I also use a Webley with .45 Auto Rim downloaded to .455 pressures with lead projectiles. I load with 3.6 grains of Bullseye and that feels low powered with 255 grain LRNFP.
 
So, in messin' about and getting ready to start loading for this rascal, I find Buffalo Bore http://www.ableammo.com/catalog/buf...tomatic-rimmed-cutter-1100-rdbx-p-134459.html in stock though it means I'll need to shoot it outa one of my 1917s to expend the brass.

Or

Go straight to Remington or Starline unprimed brass.

On the burn up the BB ammo side I can save some and compare it in a 1917 against downloads in the Enfield for S&Gs.

Otherwise - any comments on the Reminigton versus the Starline brass for multiple reloads?
 
The Buffalo Bore high performance ammo is not at all suitable for either a converted Enfield, or a 1917 S&W or Colt.

Unless you have a modern S&W Model 25 / 625 to shoot it in, DO NOT buy it!!

My personal choice would be Starline brass.

But Remington will do if you can find it.

rc
 
At $34 for a box of 20, you are going to be way better off just buying new brass. And given the choice I would always go with Starline.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top