Hey all I wanted to know what you think of an idea that I have been thinking about for a while.
I appreciate that you've put a lot of thought into this, but obviously you're in for a rough ride!
There's not much in this that seems like a positive change.
I think that it is time for a national set of comprehensive gun laws to be adopted to replace most state gun laws as well as the relevant federal laws.
We DO NOT WANT federal gun laws. That would be a miserable thing. What if the good Pennsylvanians, Arizonans, Floridans, Wyoming-ites (???), and others of states with minimal laws had to live like the poor, miserable, benighted Californians or Hawaiians or New Jerseyans? There has to be somewhere in this great country where you can go to get out from under draconian laws.
But further, you really need to understand the Constitution and how our federal and state government arrangement was set up. The 2nd Amendment said that the Federal government would NOT step in and place infringements on the right of the citizens to bear arms (but the STATES certainly could). The 14th Amendment and subsequent interpretation say that the 2nd Amendment is incorporated against the states in general, but that has to balance against the 9th Amendment which says that those powers not specifically granted to the federal government are reserved to the individual states, or to the citizens of those states. So NO, the feds should never be writing federal gun laws. (They have, and those pretty much all SUUUUUUUCK.)
I also think that the best way to make this happen in a way that would benefit everyone involved would be to introduce hurdles to ownership that the individual could have removed.
INTRODUCE MORE HURDLES? Well, full stop right there. Argument is derailed, end of story.
Some of your arguments are interesting. It would be really nice to simply expand the C&R FFL to make it more of a general gun-collector's license that would cover all firearms, and perhaps open up Title II firearms as well.
There are already plenty of hurdles to buying a gun. Expanding the C&R idea would give you what you're looking for without introducing more CRAP hanging over the heads of the rest of society.
Should all transfers to an unlicensed individual go through FFL?
No. Duh.
Would it be possible to provide for individual purchase NICS checks so that a seller could call a number and verify the validity of the buyers license?
Hmmm... probably pretty difficult, but maybe. A number folks could VOLUNTARILY call before making a private transfer? Not a terrible idea, though pretty irrelevant for most folks. A handful would use it. A slightly larger handful would even realize it existed. Remember many if not most gun transfers are just between pals and acquaintances who swap guns without even giving a thought to the legalities of it. That's not going to change, ever.
Waiting period length for unlicensed transfers?
Uh, how do you set up a waiting period that is enforceable on folks who aren't going through licensed channels anyway?
Think that one through for a minute. I mean, you could say "
pretty please with a cherry on top?" but most will utterly flout such a law.
How could we do mental health background checks for license applications efficiently and without violating medical privacy?
No idea. And I'm not certain the BAZILLIONS of false-positives wouldn't just make it a total morass anyway.
Should the license administration be handled by the states or by the federal govt?
If it is a federal license (I assume we're talking about the new expanded C&R thing, right?) then it has to be federally administered.
NOW, to be fair, I'm not sure that the Constitution give the federal government the right to do this thing, but they seem to sort of anyway, so...?