Hi all. I'm looking to buy a new .45 in the next couple of weeks and I've narrowed it down to either a S&W M&P .45 w/thumb safety ( I personally find the thumb safety appealing, I know many don't) or a Glock 30SF. The purpose of the gun would be mainly range, home defense, and other random utilitarian tasks. I really enjoyed the way the M&P felt in my hand, however I wasn't a fan of the fish scale serrations on the slide or the mushy stock trigger. The trigger seems like a pretty easy fix by purchasing an Apex sear and the serrations are only cosmetic so not a big deal but they did get my attention and not in a positive way. Mags for the M&P .45 seem to be plentiful online and surprisingly low cost. The Glock 30sf really surprised me as well as I do NOT like Glocks...at all. I find it incredible that I'm contemplating a move to the dark side with this purchase. For a gun that holds 10+1 I find it to be remarkably compact and comfortable to hold. I found the stock trigger on the Glock to be much better than the M&P and over all the gun left a very positive impression on me except for the goal post sights and the mags seem to be about $10-15 more expensive than the M&P mags from what I've seen (still neither of those on their own are a deal breaker). On one hand I almost prefer the increased size and heft of the M&P over the G30 as I'm not trying to conceal and just want something rugged and dependable that can handle everything from a weekend in the forest to an all out shtf situation but then again something more compact like the G30 also comes with a few advantages of its own while providing the same capacity. I find myself at a draw at this point and going back forth between the two pistols every other day. Anybody out there happen to have experience with both? With one or the other? Any feedback, ideas, or issues that I haven't addressed which might sway my decision more definitively one way or the other? Thanks ahead of time for any feedback.