+1Fred Fuller said:Patterning ability in a given load matters far more to me than mere pellet count. Pellets that don't hit what you're shooting at are worse than useless - they're a liability. No matter what size they are.
Though it wasn't tested, #1 buckshot is likely the best all-around buckshot size for self-defense.
I never said that it's not effective, I'm just saying that I feel like #0 or #1 buckshot is more effective. From the research that I've done, even #1 buckshot penetrates well beyond 15 inches and has a lot more pellets. In my eyes that means that it's just as effective(or more effective) and has less of a chance of overpenetrating. I will test any buckshot that I plan on using, but I'm sure at across the room distances it really won't matter.Besides the .22 LR, 00 Buck has killed more people than any. It has a long history of being effective and can't be argued.
I've been around a long time. I have never seen an argument against it.
This is a first!
I've been doing some research to decide which buckshot I'll be keeping in my home defense shotgun, and while doing so I've realized that people really overestimate it.
It seems like a lot of people go with #00 buckshot just because everyone else does and it's arguably the most well known. I've decided to use #0 buckshot because all the tests I've seen show that it has enough penetration and I would rather have twelve .32 caliber pellets then nine .33 caliber pellets.
People talk all kinds of crap about #0 buckshot and say that it's not effective because of times that it hasn't penetrated far enough at 50 yards. From what I've heard, buckshot is only very effective out to about 25 yards and slugs only out to about 50 yards with an open cylinder shotgun. Personally, past 50 yards I'm just gonna grab my rifle anyways. If I grab my shotgun it's going to be for up close and personal situations only.
Also, I'm not a big fan of the Flight Control buckshot. It just seems to make one big hole at normal buckshot distances which defeats the purpose of buckshot in my opinion. If I want one big hole I'll just use slugs. If I want to shoot further, I'll just use my rifle. I would rather have a decent spread to increase my probability of hitting a vital organ if my shot isn't dead on.
Yeah, to each their own. After reading a few things by medical examiners it seems like shotguns>rifles>pistols. I tend to grab my 9mm when I think I hear something and if that horrible day ever comes that I know I heard something the shotgun's coming out.Threads like this make me feel our house is woefully small. I can't see ANY shotgun load opening up bigger than fist-sized anywhere in our house. So I'd be comfy with any load myself. If I had a shotgun for h/d that is..... Everyone has his preferences, I prefer something else.
Have to go with Rondog on this one. At close range (inside 50 feet) any shotgun load is going to make mincemeat out of an intruder. As for patterns and penetration at 50 yards, you are hitting a very gray area. You blast someone at 50 yards you are looking at a long trial. Your life has to be in danger before you can legally pull the trigger. At 50 yards you are not in immenent danger.Threads like this make me feel our house is woefully small. I can't see ANY shotgun load opening up bigger than fist-sized anywhere in our house. So I'd be comfy with any load myself. If I had a shotgun for h/d that is..... Everyone has his preferences, I prefer something else.